How I learned to stop worrying and love my anger.

An article on anger management, written by a psychologist, was recently brought to my attention as offering good, sound, reliable advice on the subject. (Ref: psychologytoday.com/blog/hig … -literally )

In it, the author advised that the latest advice on dealing with anger is to suppress it. There followed some strategies to achieve this.

(The article is actually quite sound, or would be if the authors had told us that the people they based their research on were A Little Bit Cross rather than Really Angry as in Trashing-your-own-house Angry, or Doing-yourself-a-damage Angry — though, on second thoughts, they still remain very short sighted because anger suppressed as they recommend will in the end rise from A Little Bit Cross to Out-and-out Rage.)

Suppressing anger does not work. In fact, it will make the condition worse. Just as a steam boiler under mounting pressure will eventually explode, so too will someone who does not “let off steam”.

The strategies provided for suppressing anger will also not work. At most they will provide brief, temporary respite for mild cases. But eventually they will stop having even that effect. They will stop working because they do not stop a person’s anger from growing. Once a person’s anger has built up, has increased as it will inexorably do over time, then these strategies will be too weak to have any effect at all.

In short, the advice contained in the article is worse than useless. And I should know. I’ve learned not merely to “manage” my anger but to “cure” it. Here’s how I did it:

  1. The first crucial step was to realise that my anger had a cause. My anger was justified.

Psychologists pass anger off as a “personality problem”. This is utter humbug. We live in a highly competitive society in which everyone is competing with each other. Each is trying to put the other down in order to “win”. A competitive society is one which generates anger. So, to realise that my anger had a cause was a great relief to me and the first major step on the road to recovery.

(Although my anger had a cause, I came to realise later that I was just as competitive as the next person i.e. I was just as guilty of generating anger as anybody else. Developing the ability to be cooperative, not competitive, has been dealt with as part of a larger programme of personal development of which managing my anger was a part.)

  1. Nevertheless, my anger was harming me, was making me ill. As well as an external cause of anger, each of us has internal causes. The next step was to identify those causes which were: (A) a fear of authority, (B) inarticulacy and (C) confusion.

Being inarticulate, not being able to say what is on one’s mind is, I think, a common source of anger. (Living in a competitive society exacerbates this problem with inarticulacy. In school, for example, we do the subjects we are good at and drop those we are poor at. So, if one is inarticulate, one drops subjects such as English instead of keeping them on.)

My major fear, as I said, was a fear of authority. Each person will have their own particular fear which needs to be identified. (My fear was identified through my dreams.)

As to confusion, that is more common. In a competitive society one rarely gets one’s questions answered. So, for example, one is naturally concerned for one’s health. You hear of a scientific report that has just been published suggesting that drinking tea increases risk of cancer. A few months later a different report is published which contradicts the first. As a tea drinker, one is naturally concerned. Which report does one believe? Does one continue to drink tea and risk cancer or does one stop drinking tea? How about converting to coffee? Is coffee carcinogenic? I could enumerate hundreds of such examples from politics, to science, to health, to academia in which no one is able, or willing, to give a straight answer. That is the sort of thing I mean when I talk about confusion.

Having identified the internal sources of anger, the next stage was to start working on them.

(3) Improving one’s articulacy is a matter of practice. Write, write, write, write. Keep on writing and writing. Write some more.

To lose my fear of authority, I had to work on developing more “bottle”. This was done largely at work. I learned to speak (or write) out, to speak my mind, to “challenge” those in authority e.g. my boss. This started in small ways e.g. learning to say “no”. With each success my confidence grew. Speaking or writing my mind improved my articulacy and therefore my confidence also. I took more and more risks speaking out and was more willing to challenge colleagues at any level, in or out of the staffroom, if they tried to tease or put me down etc, etc. An unexpected consequence of being outspoken was that, far from alienating colleagues as I had feared, my standing in the workplace improved enormously. I was earning a great deal of respect. This gave me more confidence. When I applied for promotion to middle management, I got it. It took bottle to then demote myself back to being un-promoted, but I was perceived as strong for being able to do so and my standing continued to improve.

Ultimately I pushed boundaries so far, was so outspoken, that I was formally disciplined by my employer. The outcome of the hearing was that I received a “verbal warning”. I regarded that “verbal warning” as a Badge of Honour (and still do). After notification of the disciplinary hearing, but before it actually took place, I had worked up sufficient bottle to, in effect, tell my boss where he could stick it, and handed in my resignation from what was a then a secure, permanent job. (I did not have another job lined up when I resigned. I was, as it were, casting myself adrift, something I never had the bottle to do before.)

As to dealing with confusion I experienced, the way of dealing with it is to become independent of outside authorities such as science, doctors etc. This involved developing the full use of my senses and my intuition, to interpret my dreams and to use these, as well as personal experience, to make sense of the world around me. So, for example, I have since stopped going to the doctor and rely completely on all the aforementioned for health advice.

Although meditation does not directly address problems with anger, it is invaluable for reducing one’s emotional temperature overall. I learned to meditate.

All of the above had the effect of reducing my anger levels. But there was still a way to go.

(4) After working on all of the above for perhaps a decade (yes, a cure takes hard work and effort, but a cure is, ultimately achievable) I achieved sufficient detachment from my anger as to undergo a change in perception. My self-awareness increased to such a degree that I was able to appreciate that people who generated anger — the teases, the people who put you down — were actually doing more harm to themselves than to me. People real what they sow. This had the effect of further reducing my anger levels.

(5) In the film Kingdom of Heaven, newly crowned king of Jerusalem, Guy de Lusignon, wants to break the peace between the Christians and Muslims. He releases his deputy, Reynald de Chatillon, a well-known fomenter of trouble, from prison with the instruction: make me a war. Reynald clutches his sword to his chest and replies: “It’s what I do”. The scene then shifts from prison to the aftermath of battle. As Reynald surveys the carnage he says: “I am what I am. Someone has to be.”

To raise one’s level of detachment such that one can accept that people “are what they are”, to accept them for what they are instead of judging them, is the level I have now achieved. I do not expect people to understand this but it is possible to not just accept people but to appreciate that everyone has their place in society’s eco-system just like the flea, the dung beetle or the lion has its place in the natural world.

(6) Humour. Lightening up. Playing the fool. Not standing on one’s dignity. Upgrading from Half-wit to Complete Idiot. Not taking life seriously.

This is the stage I am at now. It has taken me 17 years to get here. (There’s no quick fix to learning how to deal with anger.) My current ambition, therefore, is to become a Complete Idiot.

(7) The aim of this final stage is to recognise that anger is good. It is just another tool in one’s psychological toolbox and once you know how to use it well, use it intuitively, it is one of the most valuable. Another way of looking at anger is that it is like a bear. Treat it well, do not abuse it, and it will work for you. Treat it badly, and it won’t.

So, at the moment for me the out-of-control anger is still too close, but I am learning to love my anger and the final step is to love my anger and give it free rein.

Anger is not a separate component to self. You ARE anger. I like Krishnamurti’s take of ‘non judgemental awareness.’

I like Bruce Banner and the Hulk. A man with a real anger problem. I like the new Avengers movie that came out recently where he tells them that his secret is that he’s always angry. That is the entire essence of Buddhism and taoism, and much of any other spirituality, as far as I can tell. We are always all things at all times; it becomes a matter of what we pull out of our selves and there are many things that will come to knock us off balance and we must learn not to let those things knock us off balance by learning to move with nature and with her rhythm and harmony no matter what obstacles lay in our path.

When I began to control my anger, I did it by confronting trolls and bullies online; I played at politics for years and I finally realized the tricks they were using to beat me in debates. Technically, made me beat myself in debates. Learning those tricks they used; since it is a competitive world we grow up in; was a bit hard and they didn’t tell me what they were doing. Once I learned and stopped letting them do that to me, they stopped letting me play.

Similarly, the trolls in other places I went to began to see it as a game I was playing and would purposefully be obstinate. I’d lose my anger, but then I’d out-think them and like Goku did on Dragon Ball GT, I fed into them as much as I could until they were so over-fed on entertainment and activity and then I walked away knowing they’d never find another person who could do them like I could.

A lot of frustration I had was from lack of being able to communicate and express myself, like you, and so I worked harder on being more social with my friends and stepping outside of my comfort zones. I think a lot of my anger started being easier to control once I started understanding things a bit better and learning more control. Confidence itself was a good part of the issue and knowing my self. I didn’t want to be angry and it hurt me to be angry. I was afraid of being angry. Now, I don’t have to be, because I know I’ll use it appropriately and that I want to use it appropriately.

It sounds to me that you have not actually got on top of your anger, for the most part. I agree about self-confidence and communication, but I have a problem with confronting trolls and bullies. It seems to me that what you are saying is that you practiced until you could outwit them. In other words, if a troll or bully came along who could outwit you, then your anger would reappear. You are relying on your superior abilities, and like the old gunfighters of the Wild West you will find you can never hang up your gun and that sooner or later some young gun out to prove himself will shoot you down — in fact, setting yourself up as the fastest gun in the west makes you a magnet for all the other would-be top guns.

good stuff dragon

I internalised my anger by a strategy called play the underdog or the victim. The fact that it became lame, on account of it becoming transparent, did not occur to me until I was well into anger management well into my job.

Another problem occurred when the underdog became my paradigm social role.

So, I pretty well got stuck with the idea, but for more understandable reasons.

Finally, I am starting to be able to overlap this idea with a more selfless behavior model of letting go of rationalizations of identifying by modeling .

I think playing the underdog is a very bad idea. Play it for long enough and you will loose all self-respect and confidence. I also doubt if it would do anything for anger. I think it would actually increase the anger but it may be suppressed so that you are unaware of the build-up in the subconscious. But damage will be done. It increaes your confidence and self-respect if you allow yourself to know that your anger is justified. I think that you have problems with articulacy (as I did) and that will make your anger worse. So my advice would be accept your anger (certainly do not be afraid of it) and take up meditiation as a means of calming down. Then I would say work on your writing, your articulacy and it is crucual to take the attitude that everything you write is excellent. It’s like this: you don’t expect a 5 year old child to be able to write like Shakespeare. Neither do you expect somebody who has been brought up in a no0n-literate society or non-literate section of society to be able to express themselves well. But it is just a matter of practice, and if you go for writing lost and lots of stuff and just not criticising what you write, but rather recognising its worth, then you WILL improve over time.

Thanks for that and it really has been helpful to get another opinion regarding anger management.

Literacy has a lot to do with it and another rationalisation tanks out by the self inscribed mantra of excusing my deficiencies as legitimate on account of having my primary language elsewhere.

The fact that this is an international forum and English literacy is often as in my Case is compromised may also try to buttress this lack.

Lastly it has been pointed out to me that when realizations induce a due marginalization of boundaries a predictable confusion sometimes arises.

Thanks again.

I understand what it sounds like. It’s not about trolls out-witting me or me out-witting them. It’s being able to explain ones self in a proper manner. That is all I have ever really sought to do. I have always stood up to bullies and always will. My anger only reappears when I get frustrated, which often happens when I get out-witted. Taking on bullies has helped me understand the human condition a lot better and so I’m able to explain even what they do to a certain degree.

It’s not out-witting me when most trolls just blatantly insult and try to drag you off your center of balance. That’s being brutal. Out-witting comes when I posit and idea and someone posits another idea; whether similar or contradictory; that completely leaves me in the dust, and I would not be ashamed to have such happen, but I would marvel at the sight.

I am relying on superior abilities; superior abilities that I have learned to develop due to the way my life was. I understand what I’m doing. I understand the risk that I’m taking. You don’t understand that at this point, it becomes impossible for me to hang up my gun and I don’t want to. I never wanted to be a soldier in this war, but damn it if I won’t be the best damn soldier in it.

I may run into the troll that eventually gets the better of me and makes me lose my cool again. I don’t doubt that such will happen. It will be another learning lesson and I will be glad for the reminder of humility. That no matter how good we get, there will always be someone better. It is my hope that someone will eventually become better than me.

As far as I know, I’m the only one of my kind. I haven’t often ran into other trollhunters. It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it. It’s made me a little rough around the edges, but I was already rough around the edges. It’s actually helped smooth me out a bit.

This is my purpose in life; what I was born to do. I have seen the negativity running rampant in the world; I have seen those who seek to tear it apart without building anything new and better to replace it. I have seen people tear things down just for their own sick and twisted pleasure.

You have to understand that I’m not seeking redemption. I have shown my plans to God and God has given me the information I need to follow my plans. That means he is not against me trying them to the full extent that I can. I’m going to use my talent of pulling at strings to deduce things and everything else at my disposal to unravel the lies within men. I will even go so far as to threaten death, though I know I don’t really want to kill anyone. If you had seen my experiences first-hand, you would understand. In part, you do understand, which is why you don’t engage trolls yourself and which is why you warn me against doing so.

I’m not afraid of all other top-guns; because I know there’s some out there who are just doing the same thing I am and we will come to recognize that in each other should we ever meet. The ones that aren’t like me and are the opposing side of the force… It’s silly to fear them. What can they do to me that hasn’t been done before? What can they put me through that is worse? What can they do to tear me apart? They could kill me, but there is only that one inevitable outcome to life, anyway. I would rather go out fighting than sit here and be dead on the inside and turn a blind eye to the injustices of the world, because they’re not just going away and they’re not going to as long as people continue fighting and since people refuse to put up the fight, I will go in and play the equalizer and cut down those who aren’t fighting for the right reasons.

And, if they can’t explain themselves or their reasoning, while they’re cutting down others; then they fully deserve what I have to give them.

Happiness, love, anger, fear…It’s strange we call into question the very existence of some emotions and not others. We can be loopy about when we feel anger, or habitually avoid other feelings by focusing on anger, or use anger to control others. We can misuse our hands also. I tend to agree with the first part of the second poster’s post. We are anger (and the other emotions). Just like if you slap water hard it will splash. Oh, thinks the water, it is bad of me to splash.

I recommend you read Jane Austin’s Sense and Sensibility. She is quite clear on the subject of governing one’s emotions and the detrimental consequences of not doing so. To believe you ARE anger is to believe that you know better the entirety of humanity since language was invented. People have always referred to anger as “their” anger and have talked on controlling their anger etc. It is only in the modern loopy world where the prognostications of philosophy and science are allowed to over-ride all human experience that it is possible to utter this nonsense: I am anger!

I did suspect that English was not your first language. I am having difficulty trying to guess which is your first language. I wonder which is.

Having issued some advice about articulacy, I would add this: your writing reads like poetry to me. Poetry, as you know, is often difficult to understand but it communicates much at a deeper level. You could take the attitude that you wish to pursue your poetic side in which case you should continue to write as you do and just let it develop of its own accord. The downside is that people will have difficulty understanding you.

dragon to obe

.
I don’t think that it is obe who has the problem with articulacy. He articulates so well that people have the problem of understanding him.

)

So you’re saying that he must embrace his anger? Or might it be better to see that he has anger and to be honest about that?
Wouldn’t it also be a good thing to explore it, the root of it, the real cause of it, to go back in time to see what things and what kind of people push our buttons and make us angry. We might be surprised to find what the origin of our anger is.

Obe mentioned to stop rationalizing. This is also a good way to begin to control and to defeat anger - by simply seeing rationalizing as a form of "chasing one’s own tail - how a dog does and gets nowhere and also as a form of procrastination. When we’re rationalizing, we are not moving forward but giving ourselves permission to stagnate. Perhaps one cannot even control and defeat it but rather to “see” it for what it is and to make it our friend - not to embrace it but to harmonize with it - to create positive synergy where there was only the negative.

So, with this attitude, there is no room for improvement?
If someone is NOT feeling that what they are doing or writing is excellent, how do they move forward? Isn’t it better [perhaps] to take the stance that I am where I am for a purpose and I will move forward from that. That maybe “rome wasn’t built in a day”.
It’s all judging I suppose but a moment or two of quieting the mind, being in silence can stop the judging and the thoughts.
Kind of like the words in the old testament - “Be Still and know that I Am”. We are the I AMs. :laughing:

:twocents-02cents: :slight_smile:

I’ve read it.

And I should use her works as scripture because? She had an incredible mind and I love most of her main works. But she is also a Product of her time and class which would have considered many of even your posts to be way out of the bounds of decorum. Most modern westerners would find what she considered proper behavior to be a straight jacket. The manners, the indirect way of conveying (rather than saying) things, the incredible Control of emotional expression…Which does not mean most modern Westerners agree with my position here, but they would find it very odd to Think Austen’s sense of how one relates to emotions and how one expresses them to be the rule.

People have also talked about ‘their body’ and ‘their soul’ and ‘my mind’. When you then look at their philosophy, you find that one, two, a mixture of these is who they Believe they are. Our language use around what is us and what is not us, Changes over the course of a few seconds in some conversations. Christians who Believe they are their souls will talk about ‘their souls’, scientists will say ‘my body’, and obviously parts of what they are they will refer to as ‘my’. Physicalists will say ‘my body’. As in my body is getting old, for example. People also weirdly disidentify with parts of themselves. I am certainly not saying anger is all of who one is. And it is tricky with language. It is more a quailty of our natures than the matter of our natures. But perhaps most important: To get at some of the complexity I came at it through a few analogies and also that sentence.

And it would not be the entirety of humanity since I was responding to Another poster in this thread who said it.

Notice my analogy with water. The splash is a natural reaction of the water. In that moment it is a splash (form). In other moments it has that potential to splash if certain things happen to it - impacts, for example. To start to judge this quality of water as bad is to me as silly as to judge anger as bad.

And sure people have talked about controlling anger. Perhaps they were incorrect. And notice I made Points about how the expression of anger can be an avoidance of other things, etc. I am nto making a case that all expression of anger is good and made this further clear with the analogy to hands. But sure, there has been this myth that we must remain split against ourselves, one part guarding the other, generally, more emotional part. I obviously disagree with this.

Science?! No scientist would say that. And notice I added in the other emotions also. But the main thing I note here is you did not respond to any of the points I made and counter them. Other than the Point about language, which I Think does not hold, you have simply appealed to authority - but a unique choice and one I respect if not on this issue - and reiterated your position.

Glad you think so.

Yes. But there can be many concurrent causes of one’s anger, or any emotional state. The chemicals in your brain cause your anger. So do your attitudes and perceptions. But the kind of cause you’re talking about–what we tell ourselves to justify our anger–is also important to recognize. But that can be trickier than you might think. One thing our emotions do is they hijack our thoughts and use them for their own purposes. So we can get confused as to what’s actually making us angry. We might tell ourselves that we’re angry at our friend because he/she’s an insensitive prick who doesn’t give a shit about anybody but themselves–when really we’re just angry because our friend happen to say something insensitive without realizing the effect it had on us, not that they’re actually a bad person.

Yes, that’s true with me. An inability to think on my feet–or rather speak on my feet–is a common cause for frustration and anger when it comes to arguing with people, or being pressured to justify myself when I’m being grilled. It’s not just frustrating because the other person is winning the argument or throwing accusations at me, but because I know they’re wrong or don’t know what they’re talking about–that I do have a justification–but I just can’t get it out (part of this has to do with my ADD for reasons I can expand on if you want).

I’m with you on this one.

While I don’t want to discourage you from writing, this has not helped me. It’s funny–you would think this would work–but I think writing exercises a different part of the brain than speaking–exner’s writing area to be exact–which gets its signals from Broca’s area of course (the speaking part of the brain), but it processes those signals in a different way in order to make them condusive to writing. But that’s just my experience, and your’s may be different.

Good for you.

Yes, feeling superior to others is an excellent way of feeling less threatened by them.

This is a level of maturity I aspire to, but find extremely difficult. I mean, I celebrate diversity in people, and I do believe everyone has their place, but I find it difficult to rise to a level where I feel the whole tapestry is below me, there for me to simply observe and take in. I feel too affected by everything therein because I am part of it.

Yes, one must learn to laugh at one’s self. This is part of rising to the level of the higher self. The self who can self-reflect and recognize the folly in some of the moments of his/her emotional immaturity.

Yes, and this should be common sense. Unfortunately, it’s not. But you can understand why: anger is one of those emotions (perhaps the only one) that society wants repressed and demonized. It’s the one emotion whose sole function is to motivate the individual to hurt and punish others–that is, his/her society.

Just out of curiosity, how do you take out your anger? There are many healthy ways of venting your anger, but I wouldn’t recommend blindly taking it out on people.

I laughed when I read this. So true. Then I wondered how much irony there was in this. But I think this is an important issue. People often think that feeling superior is more in control or more ethical or less emotional than getting angry. And it isn’t. And which feels worse, someone looking down on you or someone getting angry at you?

Which is, well, human.

Fear gets demonized pretty well also. I dont think that is the sole motivation of anger. What you describe sounds like anger plus a permanent judgment or anger that has been backed up for a long time or anger at physical or at least ongoing abuse of some kind.

I know how it sounded, but I was serious. I think it depends on whether your feeling of superiority is justified or not. I always think of my relation to my children when I say something like this. It may sound questionable to say that I’m superior to my children, but there is a sense in which I think this is true–and the effect is that when they get angry with me, or talk back, or threaten me with something, I’m able to laugh it off because of how cute it is.

I’m not sure. The kind of anger I’m thinking of could be contrasted with the anger of an entire community against a violent criminal, or perhaps the anger of an entire nation against another nation. IOW, anger that isn’t seen as the “enemy” of the society it is directed at.

I am afraid of psychiatrists and PhD psychologists, Gib. Not to say they’re all bad. I worry that so much of their research is an elaboration on a very obvious notion that still - just doesn’t work.

I always believed, similarly, that anger is not the raging fire to be doused out with peaceful intent. Just like “negative attitudes” are not solved by “just think happy thoughts.” I feel a bitterness in my throat just thinking about that notion.

There are some conventional “gems” out there on the more basic level. “Anger mountain” for youth groups is a good one. Life Skills stress management has some nice exercises.

What you say, Gib, has comparable similarity to my attitudes. I first like to think of conflicts very generically (as in physical combat, or as in verbal disagreement, or as in emotional turmoil, or as in literal physics like pressure tension and friction) then I think of the philosophy taught in aikido. The Aikido master aims to escape the fight (considering that escape can be relatively synonymous with victory) neither by running in a panic nor by fighting viciously. The Aikido master tries to simply expend the least amount of energy, allowing everything (or everyone) else to expend all the energy they try, and the master simply works to dodge the more dangerous attempts, and retains his reserves. In emotional management, suppression will just add tension. No one is wrong to be angry. The danger happens when people decide to assign the blame for their anger. If we all knew the appropriate injustice fueling our anger, we could revolutionize all the bad things that happen with our will to resolve it. But it’s when we allow our anger to set wild on whatever cognitive distortion we feel is the easiest, we get discord.

I would perhaps tweak your title to say: “How I learn to stop worrying and temper my anger with love.”

I watched Ender’s Game for the first time yesterday. It gave me a pretty fresh perspective on the matter.

So am I. Psychiatry/psychology is still in the dark ages AFAIC. The problem with these folks is two-fold: 1) they treat human beings as cookie cutter copies of a statistical average. They put too much stock in the statistical methodologies of the social sciences. While such methodologies can work for some applications, when it comes to psychology, it is quite moot–the reason being the standard deviations distinguishing between individuals is so vast that you really have to approach individuals as truly unique, as brand new phenomena that your statistics really doesn’t account for. 2) they think that as therapists, they are more of an expert on you than you. Now in any other line of work, this might be true. I take my car to the mechanic because I believe he is more of an expert on auto-mechanics than I am. While I rarely ever look under the hood of my car, he spends his entire career doing so. But under the hood of my skull is where I live 24/7. The so-called “expert” on my mind not only hasn’t looked under my hood, but can’t. I have far more experience dealing with the inner goings on of my own mind than any psychiatrist or therapist can ever have. The best roll he/she can play is a helpful assistant, but that’s it.

I hear ya. I think forcing yourself to “think happy thoughts” is tantamount to repression and denial. However, that’s not to say there is no such thing as positive thinking. They key with me has always been to try to find something that I could actually believe–something that makes sense.

This rings very much like my advice to dragon:

That may be a fair tweaking, but you’ll have to ask dragon–it’s her thread.