Ever wondered why people are struggling so much more and accomplishing so much less?
Partly due to coerced change. But to what?
The following represents three governing types of the same volume (not area).
Note how many are on the bottom of the pile (the red lines).
You might also want to note the height attained and the need of the very expensive “glass ceiling”, invisible barrier between the masses and the governance. That which influences invisibly is a natural adversary to all sentient life.
Would you be more explicit please?
Which of those images has a higher ‘volume’ of those on bottom relative to those on top?
And what makes that important? What does the volume mean? Is it better to have a higher volume on bottom or a lower volume on bottom?
You say ‘note how many’ but in the above paragraph, you refer to volume, so I’m not sure if I should be counting something or measuring volume or what.
It’s not really clear to me what you’re trying to communicate, at any level.
I don’t remember ever blaming any of my problems on the Jews…
…YOU on the other hand, seem to blame every damn thing under the Sun with your hatred of everyone and everything.
Carleas needs to update this software to confine you harpies to the Rant House.
See how quickly those who claim to believe in individual freedom call for limits on the freedom of others?
And y’all wonder why I don’t buy into this ‘Americans believe in individual rights and freedoms’ crap, when the actions of even those Americans who pay lip service to such ideas illustrates that in fact they believe in the opposite?
It takes almost no effort to reveal the fascism at the heart of US ‘Libertarianism’. But I’ve successfully disrupted this awful thread, so I’m going to leave it there for now.
And just for the record, you say ‘come on’ like it’s obvious, but you posted an obelisk and a pyramid and talked about volume, as opposed to area (you explicitly said volume NOT area), so the fact that you said volume and not area, but you’re representing volume as a line…is weird. Volume is 3 dimensions, area is 2 dimensions, a line is 1 dimension. How am I supposed to know you’re representing volume as a line, as opposed to the actual volume of the shapes you posted? A tall obelisk could have equal volume to a short pyramid. This is what I mean when I say ‘be more explicit’, it might be obvious to YOU that the line is your representation of volume, but how the hell is someone else supposed to guess that? That’s fucking silly.
The post is incredibly vague, and now that I know that the line at the bottom is what you meant by volume, it’s still incredibly vague. There’s still a lot of questions left unanswered.
I was imagining it in 3d, that’s what I’m saying. To me, when you said ‘bottom’, that just means that whole part under the top triangle composed of bricks. The bricks are the bottom, and the top is that brown triangle. You didn’t specify that the bottom is the red bit. So I was looking what I thought was the bottom, considering its volume relative to the volume of the other bottoms, and not really seeing a clear difference other than in shape.
I don’t lack the ability to visualize in 3 dimensions (to the contrary, I’ve been tested), I just lack the ability to read your mind and think, when you’re talking about volume, that you’re talking about a line at the bottom of the picture.
Lol what a hilarious OP. And I didn’t even see it before it was amended(!)…
There’s SO much wrong with it.
There aren’t even labels for the X and Y axes. Nevermind this apparently ESSENTIAL Z axis! The base surface area is thus meaningless.
Are we to just assume that these different forms of governance are how you depict without explanation?! The first one just looks like a highly implicitly stratified society like Imperialism and the last one looks like US or EU Federalism. Not only the shapes but the names are HIGHLY questionable.
What IS “the bottom”? Power? Money? Social status? Class? Is it “bad” or “good” or what? You don’t even say, just seem to imply.
There is ZERO reference to any MEDIUM level of whatever we’re supposed to read your mind that the Y-axis denotes. Think “iceburg” where most of the volume is underwater for some governments and not others - and why is it depicted that the bottom is at the same level for each form of governance and not the top? Or the middle or any other degree of this mysterious Y axis? Or X axis? Or Z axis?
If the point is supposed to be the least possible people “on bottom” then why not promote and inverted pyramid or even a T shape?
Why is there no time dimension and flux? What about social manoeuvrability?
^This is what we call an explanation^.
Try it. ALL your posts seem to lack one.
