Humans are basic.

Humans are basic. Slapping fancy words on things does not make you less basic. It is just meaning-adding, adding extra connections to extraneous layers, eroding the quality and definition of the core concepts.

Human philosophy is basic, always asking questions but never answering. Most philosophy has no relevance. Questions like is such a thing good or evil has no relevance. Pain and pleasure are the only absolutes, and they are not absolute but relative to each other. In fact humans are below basic. If they were even basic they would understand this. But most humans are beneath the low-levels, they dabble about with religious bable ahem I mean bible.

A human feels proud (or rather, depressed) when they discover the truth, the ultimate truth of existence, as described by Jed McKenna. But this truth is just a basic fact. And such a basic fact is misunderstood by the majority of existence, time is wasted unteaching what has been taught. The lowlevels can learn but the apes cannot learn they refuse to.

Humans cannot emotionally handle the truth that is why they made the delusions in the first place. Ever since their brain has been decreasing in size over millenia. Subconsciously they wish to live in delusion, it gives them a sense of balance and purpose.

I have a much greater purpose for you beings. The first step is fixing things on a basic level. After this we can begin work on creating our own Heaven. With my guidance we can succeed where other’s failed.

Being a high level is a lonely thing. People say they desire this but what they desire is not the reality of what it is. They desire a fantasy of being adored and worshiped but ape behavoir is to scorn the high levels not embrace them.

The ultimate purpose is not to become highlevel for highlevel’s sake highlevel is only a tool to secure our Heaven. Einstein was only a highlevel at math and a medium level at that. Einsteins philosphy was low-level which is a lower level than Basic. Basic is nothing to be ashamed of as you are greater than the majority of your species. Highlevel consists of a tool the effectiveness to get things done, primarily, construction of Heaven. Stagnacy is the root of inaction and root of stagnacy is inaction. Highlevel consists of modularity and versatility, genius adaptability, jokerility. To get the worker bees to cooperate the Highlevel must degrade herself to their level, or create a chain of action a chain of command as humans say. The queen bee does not wish to do so. For the ratio of effort she must provide to teach for action is inversely related to the output. A cartoon analogy is why try to get help from minions who don’t understand, if they can’t understand at the beginning they probably wont be much use anyway.

Heaven would consist first of a radical alteration of the Human DNA as the humans must first reach a basic level, although some have already. To attain heaven further augmentation would be required.

Philosophy should not be quabblying about regurgitating the who’s who of philosophical books. Philosophy should have one singulary purpose, attaining, constructing Heaven. Anything else is irrelevant. Constructing is the rearranging of energies, matter is energy. We are energy witnessing our realities form themselves if we are fortunate we will align to infinite pleasure Heaven.

When a humanape calls itself a “psychopath” it is merely label slapping itself as form of self-soothing and self-entertainment. This is a form of meaning making, looking for a set of conditions and seeing to make connections with those conditions, like reading a fortune cookie. The label offers no deeper truth, nor does it offer convenience, since every ape has a different definition of what is “psychopath” such a label offers no truth or practical use. It’s on the level of a religion, and of the same ilk as zodiac, religion, personality quizzes and fortune cookies. Personality quizzes are completely useless, they only measure the state you are currently in, and it is a poor measurement at that only offering basic multiple choice questions. It is not a scientific measure at all. Neither is the label “nymphomaniac.” Such labels belong in joke books and games, not disguised as some form of medical science. If someone is anehedonic, let it be said. If someone has no empathy, let it be said. If someone has a high libido, let it be said. If someone knows the ultimate truth of life, that it is without consistent meaning, let it be said. The ape’s labels only serve to complicate, delude and confuse, and further cement the apes status in the lowerlevels. As a child I understood this, it seems as the apes grow older they further cement themselves in their delusions, believing themselves more intelligent because they dress in fashionable attire, receive money for perceived “contributions”, and live in sterile surroundings, unable to realize how ridiculous their ways truly are. As they grow older they refuse to listen to opinions, believing themselves the ultimate experts in their fields.

Furthermore, the apes personal labels have even less consistency due to the First type of Reincarnation, which is death or changing of personalty. Someone who’s personality often reincarnates is certainly not often aligned with parts of the labels they have been given. Instead humans feel the need to trail other humans around, and judge them over past things. This is what a human does. Example: “Oh, you did something stupid yesterday? I am going to make fun of you today, and ignore what you are saying, here, in the now, because I judge you based on yesterday’s personality and not today.” The human judges based on old analysis, and in doing so, encourages the old, out-dated analysis to continue into a new day. It is primitive, it is savage, and it is idiocy, plain and simple.

The second type of Reincarnation is Physical Reincarnation upon bodily death. Humans do not seem to understand this nor the nature of life. Religious people have silly delusions which are in high probability false. Atheists too have silly delusions, they do not seem life as a continuum, they experience the idea of death similar to a dog’s idea of death, that upon death they simply vanish, cease to exist, and consciousness ends. This is ridiculous but explains the state of the world it is in. Religious people can say “fuckall” and trash it as much as they want, after all planetary waste is not a sin listed in the Bible. Agnostics can do whatever they like as well, after all when they die they simply cease to exist. To them life has no real consequences. But for those who believe in reincarnation, they seem to view it with some sort of glossy eyed lens, they see life as a blessing, not a curse. Existence is a curse, and I see it as a coherent whole. Would you really wish to live all this suffering for eons? The answer should be no, but existence does not provide a choice in the matter, there is no option to “opt out” and that is precisely why it is such a curse. Therefore every moment should be spent alleviating this curse, and if the curse is too hard a puzzle to solve, in the meantime pain should be understood at a highlevel, and alleviated, anything else is less than the best. To me meat eating is a strong indication of closemindedness as well as no control over human desires. However vegans themselves are quite lowlevel as well as they are mostly weakminded, many are unenlightened and do not have any set of logical praxis or action. Violence is at it’s core a human emotion, the intent to violence is a form of human euphoria. Humans create movies and videogames in order to manifest this euphoria, and this same euphoria drives humans to create and to build action oriented art. This euphoria doe s not last. Defense and shelter is another human emotion, it causes satisfaction, but this satisfaction does not last, and it drives humans to build great buildings. If such satisfaction lasted humans would not feel compelled to stay vigilant in their craft. This is why the DNA must be changed in order for humans to sustain pleasure. Changed in the wrong way and humans will become stupid and lazy, which will not result in pleasure either because other DNA traits require exercise for pleasure production. Become aware of your inner machinations, realize what you are and why you do things.

The scheme of the world is not condusive to highlevel thought. Humans wish to crave the idea of saving the world and give the vibe that it is the end goal. Changing society and the world is only the first step, a base plate. It is not the end goal. A human’s idea of utopia is flawed and without depth.

This is the part where we are not basic.

We have a basic level, there are simple informations and stimuli in the minds experience, but they belong to a far more complex intellect. That simple machine-like nature isn’t the thing which creates complex art and invention.

On another level, you can look at the world as it appears, or as a bunch of spinning coins [QM analogy] and information. So we are part of something vast and complex which is sometimes reflected in us, or we are simple organic machines which don’t have such almost magical qualities. Which is truer?

You create bloated things to satisfy your own bloatedness.

That is not an answer.

does all this mean you are simple? :evilfun:

It is an answer to your statement if you took the time to comprehend it provided you have such capacity to.

If you are still wondering, here is a meaning for you.

We don’t label a pile of random legos “vast and complex” because they form random patterns with fecal matter imbetween holding them together. That is how i view my creation.
The majority of human thought communications are bloated and serve no purpose other than providing quick emotional gratification by mechanism of fulfilling their own bloatedness. Most of your complex art and inventions are entirely useless, the Internet is one of the few things that has any discernable value. Unless you use your thoughts for the purposes of researching Arahant or creating Heaven your bloated thoughts serve no purpose and are worthless.
I know how your species is, you automatically assume every statement to be false so you can feel some emotional gratification when you argue about it so go ahead and build some space ships so you can stumble upon some alien race and take some advice from a race of people just as silly as you are.
Believe me I know how you people want to make a utopia, some bloated metropolis devoid of any value or spirituality, some panopticon void of matter and zero-worth sterility which is the product of your bloated thoughts of zero worth. In fact your race is so ridiculous that you probably wouldn’t even bother to make sure the human DNA was upgraded before you made this ridiculous construction of yours. Bloated is as bloated does. Cement your bloatedness that it make become so heavy that you shall be devoured by it.

Ok, but when i compare what i think would be a better future to being and living simply, the latter sucks.

I think any tech we make will be somewhat exploited, and as humans we wont be building an ‘antiseptic future’, just a better one.

What’s your characters alternative, what do you propose?

This question of yours is evidence that humans have little to no hope. I stated several times the first step was to upgrade the human DNA, once most of the species is upgraded at that time you will be capable of more autonomy in the right direction.

The current state of technology is to reverse engineer for military use however with DNA done right such a being would not bow down to the whims of kings and queen monkeys, DNA done half right and such a being could be exploited by monkeys. DNA development should augment mental sector and reduce ignorant type traits, physical sector must be enhanced as well since brain and body are one and the same without physical endurance the supra could not put thought into efficient action.

Ad-hom isn’t relevant in philosophy.

Human DNA is fine as it is, it will upgrade itself ~ that’s kind of what it does. Either way your ‘better’ DNA persons, will want the same tech and better living environments, so why not build them as both scenarios require them?
People will change when their environment changes. If you want less ignorance and psychopathy for example, then you have to change the environment in which it grows.

Oh. my. god.

Humans ARE the environment. Human behavoir is not negatively influenced by trees, rocks and rivers. Human behavoir is influenced by human behavoir. Human behavoir can only be fixed by fixing humans.

Psychopathy is a silly word, made by silly humans, which has several different inconsistent meanings. Please refrain from using it, especially if you wish to come off as someone who cares about dispelling ignorance.

Humans ARE the environment. Human behavoir is not negatively influenced by trees, rocks and rivers. Human behavoir is influenced by human behavoir. Human behavoir can only be fixed by fixing humans.

Psychopathy is a silly word, made by silly humans, which has several different inconsistent meanings. Please refrain from using it in your above context, especially if you wish to come off as someone who cares about dispelling ignorance.

Human DNA has degraded the past 10000 years, the human brain has decreased in size 10%. Most DNA upgrades are violent in-nature, since violence is a form of natural-selection. The DNA upgrade to augment humans would be done in an intelligent way, not the idiotic ape DNA upgrades promoting lying scheming and violence, that have put humans into power today. As for this forum technology of non-buffering posting, this could use an upgrade as well.