# I am a prodigy.

Molecular structure for “Titanium”:

C = 72/144.132 ←

H = 10/10.079

F = 36/75.992

N = 14/28.014

Ti = 88/191.468

72 + 10 = 82 ←

82 + 36 = 118 ←

118 + 14 = 132 ←

132 + 88 = 220

144 + 10 = 154

154 + 75 = 229

229 + 28 = 257

257 + 191 = 448

132 + 79 = 211

211 + 992 = 1203 <—

1203 + 14 = 1217

1217 + 468 = 1685 <-----

233.205576

17.45822

122.955056

45.53052

309.795224

233 + 17 = 250

250 + 122 = 372 <----

372 + 45 = 417 <----- (1685/417 = (4) 1668; 17r)

417 + 309 = 726 <----

“2054730”

Half: 1027365 (1024) [size=200]42; 7 x 6[/size]

Half: 513682.5 (512) [size=200]24; 8 x 6[/size]

Half: 256841.25 (256) [size=200]24; 6 x 4[/size]

Half: 128420.625 (128) [size=200]6; 3 x 2[/size]

Half: 64210.3125 (64) [size=200]6; 6 x 1[/size]

Half: 32105.15625 (32) [size=200]15; 3 x 5[/size]

Half: 16052.578125 (16) [size=200]42; 6 x 7[/size]

Half: 8026.2890625 (8) [size=200]24; 3 x 8[/size]

Half: “4013.14453125” (4) [size=200]24; 6 x 4[/size] <---------------------

[b][size=200]Just look at this number magic! The numbers I have look absolutely random and huge, but… I’ll show you in only Three Steps the magic of my numbers.

See the 6 x 7 / 7 x 6 mirror? u[/u]

See the 8 x 6 / 3 x 8 mirror? u[/u]

See how 4013.14453125 leads to 6 x 4, while 256841.25 also leads to 6 x 4? u[/u][/size][/b]

[b][size=200]42 = 6

24 = 6

24 = 6

6 = 6

6 = 6

15 = 6

42 = 6

24 = 6

24 = 6

2054730 = 777

6 x 9 = 54

7 x 3 = 21

54 + 21 = “75”

24 + 6 = 30

24 + 6 = 30

60 + 15 = “75”

42 + 75 = “117”.

150 - 117 = “33”

6 + 6 + 6 = “18”

75 + 33 = “108”.

33 - 18 = “15”

---------> “15” x “5” = “75”. <---------

---------> “15” x “6” = “90”. <---------

---------> “15” x “7” = “105”. <---------

42 + 24 + 24 = “90”.

42 + 24 + 24 = “90”.

90 x 2 = “180” <--------------------------------------------------- Genius. As you can see, no matter what I do, the numbers are taking me in circles - not normal numbers you see at your broke down school system - the real numbers that are flowing through space and matter.[/size][/b]

Are you Autistic?

[b][size=200]42 + 24 + 24 = “90”.

42 + 24 + 24 = “90”.

90 x 2 = “180”

I got 18 this way.

I got 18 another way:

6 + 6 + 6 = “18”

I got 18 this way:

75 + 33 = “108”.

I got 18 this way too:

6 x 6 x 6 = 216. That is 36.

6 x 9 = 54. 36 + 54 = 90. Oh, look. We’re about to create another “18”.

No matter what I do, I am going to end up in circles via this sequence of numbers.

Keep in mind, this isn’t like school; I’m not making up numbers and just adding them. These numbers already existed in Titanium’s molecular structure - I am using the exact numbers it has - I still get 18’s. What does that mean? It means that life is mathematically perfect.[/size][/b]

[b][size=200]The Universe is creating circles by increments of 4, as evidence by 144 and 288. However, the Universe’s “dimensional cap” is 9, not 12. 12 happens when the Universe combines numbers 1~9 first. Anyways, here’s how it works. 144 is 4/10, 288 is 8/10, 432 is 12/10

2/10 = 72

2/10 goes into 4/10 = 144

4/10 goes into 8/10 = 288

The cycle repeats infinitely.

That “full circle” and "1/10 formula I kept finding is based entirely on that infinite cycle.

396 <— is One circle and 1/10 of a circle. (See that brilliance? That’s why 3 6 9 are magical numbers along with 15 and 33).

15 + 33 = 48.

48 x 2 = 96.

What numbers did I use one last time? “15”, “33”, “396” and “18”.[/size][/b]

Many numbers does not a theory make.

I have never cared for theories, only fact, so bring some facts.

These numbers:

Then these numbers “1024 > 512 > 256 > 128 > 64 > 32 > 16 > 8 > 4” were the same numbers in a picture that has 0% relevance to the molecular structure of Titanium - or so everyone thought.

You know what is sad? The fact that you don’t bother to understand what I do, but insist on commenting on it. Do you know what this reminds me of? This reminds me of a kid that pretends to know everything when you ask them a question. Then when you tell them to prove it, suddenly they don’t know everything.

I suddenly understood it clearly. It makes perfect sense that the universe can only be perfectly understood to be made out of the only objective values that the mind can manifest

“A” = “A” is structurally meaningless; therefore it is not logical. This is different from illogical - it has even less to do with logic itself. The logic of numbers is the only grammar that will clarify our categorical interpretations, as it moves with our observations.
Beyond numbers, there is only flux. No notion whatsoever, no discrete instance - ‘nothingness’ or pure possibility.

The number that survived as master-signifier was the number that could stabilize the greatest structure in terms of itself. All other orders became subservient.

Mind is close to origin. Creature evolves from origin to origin - mind is ‘an evolving’ - a very fast one.
Therefore it brings one origin close to the next.

Comprehension is a door to eternity.

Is 1 a number?
Yes says Homer, as “one is three”.

Numbers are objective because they objectively relate to each other - not because they represent. They are the structures in which the minimal things (selfvaluings) form the minimal objects (values).

Finally a genius to come and save me from the children of the congress way. I have a magnificent treat to share with you, brother.

9+1 (1-9) worlds

22 (4) paths

1 \ 10 / 1 (A)

2 \ 9 / 2 (B)

3 \ 8 / 3 (C)

4 \ 7 / 4 (D)

5 \ 6 / 5 (E)

I’m going to try something out.

5 5 goes into 10 (A)

4 4 goes into 8 (C)

3 3 goes into 6 (E)

3 3 1 goes into 7 (D)

4 4 1 goes into 9 (B)

These numbers give me: 99, 33, 133 & 144.

99 + 33 = 132.

132 + 133 = 265

265 + 144 = 409 <— “4 5 1” in disguise.

The numbers we’re looking at right now is “4 5 1”.

This is connected to my latest post.

Also, here’s the path:

first you have to tell us what a number is- if you cant then your theory is rubbish- meaning you are not as clever as your ego would have us believe
at the moment mathematicians cant tell us what a number is without circularity

[size=200]Read:[/size] The very last two sequences after all that work, we got “1 6”. This number is the most important number of them all. It looks like a basic every day 16, doesn’t it? What I’m about to show you will blow your mind:

[b][size=200]

6 1 6 1 6 (Sequence can be found in Fibonacci’s Sequence)

1 3 3 3 1 (Sequence can be found in Pi)

2 1 2 1 2 (Sequence can be found in Golden Ratio)[/size][/b]

When I was an apprentice at breaking down numbers, I made a discovery that wasn’t very apprentice like.

I reverse-engineered Fibonacci’s Sequence, Pi and Golden Ratio at the very start of this passion I have for breaking down numbers. It gave me three pieces of a puzzle, which I put together. If you look closely, the 1’s create a “ring”; the 3’s are in the center; the “6 1 2” is the Universe’s greatest fraction connected to:

131 is 5.

632 is 2.

5 + 2 = “7”.

The greatest fraction is 2/16. 1 + 6 = 7. That is now “2/7”. 2 goes into 7 “3” times; left over is “1”. (131).

That’s only the beginning:

If you add the numbers vertically across, you get:

[b][size=200]6 + 1 + 2 = 9

1 + 3 + 1 = 5

6 + 3 + 2 = 2

1 + 3 + 1 = 5

6 + 1 + 2 = 9[/size][/b]

The sequence is “9 5 2 5 9”.

Our human DNA is comprised of “4” molecular structures: [size=200]Guanine, Adenine, Cytosine and Thymine. There is a molecular structure that comes from RNA called Uracil that came together with DNA to create the perfect sequence:[/size]

Our DNA follows a sequence: [size=200]5 (red) > 12 > 5 (yellow) > 9 > 12 > 5 (red) > 9 > 5 (yellow) > 5 (red) > 12 > 5 (yellow) > 9 > 12 > 5 (red) > 9 > 5 (yellow)[/size]

When I first did this, I was || close to becoming a genius with numbers. However, the next molecular structure in the sequence was not right. That’s when I discovered Uracil (12; Orange).

I then got: [size=200]5 (red) > 12 > 5 (yellow) > 9 > 12 > 5 (red) > 9 > 5 (yellow) > 5 (red) > 12 > 5 (yellow) > 9 > 12 > 5 (red) > 9 > 5 (yellow) > 12 (orange)[/size]

Did you catch it?

[size=200]The numbers I created on my own terms via sequences from Fibonacci, Pi and Golden Ratio were “9 5 2 5 9”; the numbers of our DNA follow a “9 5 12 5 9” sequence. I tied the Fibonacci Sequence, Pi and Golden Ratio to our very own DNA mathematically through a rigorous process that can be recreated again, and again… and again.[/size]

[size=200]Hi, my name is Jane, and I like to tell everyone math is self-contradicting while typing on a computer that is built on supposedly self-contradicting math (I probably know nothing about this computer like numbers, therefore the computer is self-contradicting too! I can’t admit to myself that I am computationally illiterate, that’s too hard…). Oh, also Jane here still, I say math is self-contradicting because I don’t understand the language of numbers - it’s easier to pretend you know than know, or not know - just look at how I purposely ignored the connections between Fibonacci’s Sequence, Pi and Golden Ratio to our very own DNA! These numbers are too big for me! I’ll just trivialize them so they don’t intimidate me anymore. Jane out.[/size]

[size=200]I wonder why these huge sequence of numbers give me:[/size]

Half: 1027365 ([size=200]1024[/size]) [size=200]42; 7 x 6[/size]

Half: 513682.5 ([size=200]512[/size]) [size=200]24; 8 x 6[/size]

Half: 256841.25 ([size=200]256[/size]) [size=200]24; 6 x 4[/size]

Half: 128420.625 ([size=200]128[/size]) [size=200]6; 3 x 2[/size]

Half: 64210.3125 ([size=200]64[/size]) [size=200]6; 6 x 1[/size]

Half: 32105.15625 ([size=200]32[/size]) [size=200]15; 3 x 5[/size]

Half: 16052.578125 ([size=200]16[/size]) [size=200]42; 6 x 7[/size]

Half: 8026.2890625 ([size=200]8[/size]) [size=200]24; 3 x 8[/size]

Half: “4013.14453125” ([size=200]4[/size]) [size=200]24; 6 x 4[/size] <---------------------

[size=200]Why would a self-contradicting sequence of numbers from Titanium’s molecular structure coming at 11 digits long with “random” numbers give me the numbers “4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024” from:[/size]

[b][size=200][u]Here’s a thought: What if the people that prefer to pretend the crucial things in life don’t exist, also pretended they themselves didn’t exist? Finally nobody would have to put up with your hyperbolic skepticism and straight up facetious excuses. Do us all a favor; take your pretentious need to trivialize everything that makes you realize how little you know and trivialize yourself instead!

Enough with your facetious need to trivialize life by placing it in a small box equal to your own capacity.

Do not think for a second that I did not realize how quickly you responded to my original post. I know you did not read all of that, let alone comprehend it, in 20 seconds flat. Next time, at least try to pretend you read it instead of being a fool that only cares to build their bullshit mountain by kicking the bottom shit at the top, while the top is collapsing already. Nobody cares about your ill-willed preconceptions. Wake the hell up already.[/u][/size][/b] [b][u][size=200]Anybody that tells me numbers are self-contradicting while using complicated tools built on by numbers really needs to get help.

If that doesn’t convince you, then why don’t you research Albert Einstein? He, himself, said he used numbers like I am right now to discover what he did. And if you’re another one of those loons that think Science is evil, a lie or a joke… [/size][/u][/b] [size=200]Haha, well thank you for making my day.[/size]

I want to watch Pi now.

I suspect that a few people on here need to watch it.

…but at least he made a funny

He IS a “funny”.

… in a sad sort of way.

[size=200]And I thought Sarah Palin was a disgrace! Now we have Numbah Palin; a Jane Do that is Jane Zero.[/size]