Is that you apologizing to your mom profusely, Détrop? I’m so PROUD of you!!! gush gush gush!!! 1,0000 tears cried rn!!!
Ichthus.
I don’t have to apologize to anyone.
I don’t and never have wanted to be.
Now that I’m back.
I’m guarding my soul. Just like the old days.
You’re not guarding your soul.
I can do anything I want in this world Ichthus.
I just spend my time teaching.
There are lots of famous teachers.
You’ll only get the truth here from a humble philosophy board.
Adding to that.
A person as old as me chooses everyone instead of one person.
Do as you want with my body
It only brings people together.
Bring it here.
Once I figured out the trick of the men and women.
Women want to hurt me for giving away their secret and men want to hurt me to get sex.
I made the wise chess move.
I gave my body to everyone, not just you
I’ll say this here.
Anyone who wants to be cannot win a debate against someone who never wanted to be.
Jesus lost the debate to me.
His father lost the debate to me.
You called one eternally dead being to this world and I can take on all your deities.
You’re a cruel people
My message after that.
Don’t disturb the dead.
My current roommate is a great catch for any woman.
Just like me.
Even my cat.
I have angels all around me.
I’ll endure your world, but never call me back here again.
It’s rude
Bring it here. Gotta start somewhere. Especially before the flood of demand ensues… or perhaps to initiate it? I’m your wing man right here. I’m just a steppingstone to all your wildest dreams.
Fine. Hoard your wealth. Playa.
When person N finds out person P reciprocally likes person X, person X should become person OFF LIMITS to person N, unless person X is Quality X… only Quality X can be shared reciprocally among all persons, and only Quality X owns anything—all persons merely share (or pretend to own) that which belongs to Quality X.
You can substitute person X and person OFF LIMITS with object X and object OFF LIMITS.
Is this saying you should never seek a person or object? No.
It’s saying:
Only One is Quality X — seek them first.
Only seek person/object X.
Never seek person/object OFF LIMITS.
With that in mind, let’s evaluate the 10 Commandments.
Interestingly, it knows the difference between persons and objects…
- You shall have no other gods before Me.
Translation. “Know that there is only One personhood of perfect Xness. Seek Quality X with that at the front of your mind.”
- You shall make no idols.
Translation. “Um… My eyes are in here.”
- You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
Translation. “If you don’t respect what I’m about, keep Quality X out your mouth!”
- Keep the Sabbath day holy.
Translation. “Make time for just Quality X together.”
- Honor your father and your mother.
Translation. “Respect those charged with reproducing Quality X.”
- You shall not murder.
Translation. “You didn’t invent Quality X. It is not yours to destroy. Seek Quality X.”
- You shall not commit adultery.
Translation. “Let your yes be yes like your word is Quality X.”
- “You shall not steal.”
Translation. “Seek only object X, not object OFF LIMITS.”
- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Translation. “Treat them like they are made in the image of Quality X, and only pull their actual weeds and prune them in such a way that it will help draw out their good fruit (which belongs to Quality X)—and not disparage it out of jealousy.”
- You shall not covet (long list).
Translation: “…any object or any person that is OFF LIMITS. Prioritize Quality X.”
In other words:
Only one self/other is Quality X.
All other selves are in the image of Quality X.
If you stick to seeking Quality X, you won’t want what is not shareable with others. Any external impulses from your body or wider environment will be labeled as intrusive by you and pruned.
You aren’t pruning…you’re coveting. That is a choice to leave the weeds to grow and excess branches/fruit to suck the life out of the fruit. You are settling for less than Quality X when you prioritize quantity.
…preaching to myself here, maybe?
See? You royally suck at debate.
Concede.
Thank you for trying, but that’s not the one.
Ec…
Isn’t that what you’re really doing? Isn’t your supposed empathy for others who wish they had “someone that someone else has” (or to be had like “someone else is had by someone else”) just a mask for that? You yourself admit you want what you want (everyone) — it’s not because you don’t want others to feel left out.
If everyone/people 
started with wanting someone (to have them) who no one else has (especially if seeking Quality X first), then no one would feel bad that they don’t have someone or aren’t had like someone else.
And you can just forget about saying you don’t want to have anyone. You want to have everyone! … in a very shallow sense that takes no responsibility for how you impact them on the level of personhood. That has diddly squat to do with empathy.
In some of your videos, you don’t sound as ridiculous. You acknowledge that that kind of sex does not equate to love. What happened?
That kind of sex took over your brain like fentanyl, didn’t it, Ec?
Ichthus.
Nobody wants to have sex with me as a woman.
But they like my company better than their partners.
I can provide the best company in the world no matter how intelligent you are.
That’s why I’ll take all women.
They feed off me for the stimulation while they fuck someone else.
That will kill this species.
I was tricked by men and women that they wanted this species to live.
I’m not falling for that trick again:
You all want it to die.
What you all want to do is what will be
I’ll add to this.
Women thank me for giving them a good time when they’re having really hard days.
But they won’t fuck me.
They’ll fuck the person causing the problems .
I’ll protect their souls. Their partners would never protect their souls.
I’ll add to the last two posts.
I want men and women to understand this.
The nice guys are always taken is a phrase women use all the time.
The nice guys are dead, they committed suicide.
I didn’t do it.
The power of all these spirits combined can hell the whole world. I’m asking them not to do it.
I’m explaining to them that they were too good for this world.
I survived the holocaust.
Women killing all the good men.
Note this 
word…
You seem to like other men’s partners, don’t you? Could that be the reason why these women aren’t interested in you, because they’re taken.
MagsJ
He’s messing with the harmonic triads now. Want. Do. Be.
He’s basically admitting he’s not a nice guy, though. If he was nice, he’d be dead, according to his logic.
How is that even possible? The dude in his videos is adorably innocent-seeming.
Is it really true that a man is nice who killed himself because a woman didn’t reciprocate when he wanted them to leave their partner for him?
The answer is no. He should not have wanted a woman who already had a partner.
And is it really true that a man is nice who kills himself because a woman didn’t reciprocate when he wanted them to be OK with him being the partner of everyone?
Also no.
And is it really true that a man is nice who does not kill himself despite the previous two reasons?
No. Because those two previous reasons still exist.
But I’m glad he did not kill himself. Perhaps he can live to learn a lesson and like someone who does not already have a partner and also not expect someone to reciprocate when they want to have everyone as a partner.
I certainly hope they do not expect everyone to reciprocate… and then blame them for not meeting said ridiculous expectation… and then think they are a hero when they “defend” them in cosmic court.
And then, after being so ridiculous, they don’t even read the previous posts that I wrote.
Or am I the one who is ridiculous for expecting them to have read them?
…but it does not change the fact that they are a ridiculous debater. I hold them in contempt.
Court is adjourned.
What if her partner was an imaginary friend, though? Does that change the entire scenario?
What if he is quality X and he doesn’t want sex, but just to share quality X with everyone made in the image of quality X? Does that change the entire scenario?
I’m gonna stop you right there, BriBri.
We’ve landed ourselves back here:
Stop me if you’ve already heard this one.
Boy wants a car from his Dad.
Male wants sex from all females.
The Dad says, “First you gotta cut that hair.”
The females say, “First, you gotta choose one for whom you will be an honest and faithful protector.”
The boy says, “But Dad, Jesus had long hair.”
The male says, “But Jesus loves EVERYone!”
And Dad says “That’s right son, and Jesus walked everywhere.”
And the females say, “That’s right, and Jesus stayed a virgin.”
P.s. Someone who pays for sex is still an incel. That means anyone who has sex with someone they don’t actually love, or who doesn’t actually love them.
That is the verdict.
That kind of sex ain’t even sex yet.
This is where you tell the press you will not appeal the decision, and deliver a public apology.