RF, not only do you write walls of text, which are indicative of someone who’s not wise, you claim teaching is an attack even though you presumably try to teach…
RF, I knew from your first post with me, that you talk bullshit out of your ass… And you continue to prove it
Explain how my walls of text are unwise. If you can not or if you will not, then you are wrong and need to stop opening your mouth fallaciously.
FWIW i’ve heard in roman catholic church that when you eat Jesus you become him
So what if you are Jesus… you’re no different than anyone else
Eating the flesh is a metaphor for the spirit. People of Jesus time did not understand the spirit.
They still don’t.
Ummm…
Try reversing that thought and then consider the probabilities (considering who wrote the scriptures to begin with).
So few understand any of what matters most it’s almost unbelievable. Christ was supposed to help folks believe in God and was an epic failure then and onwards. His very own apostles lacked belief in his being while he was in the flesh twice standing near them. No joke that Christians are easily hatable with all their lack of beliefs. Christ is their God, but who is Christ’s God? It’s ridiculousness to its core.
Christianity has to be the most malleable of all the major religions
I really don’t think you know what christ was supposed to do if you think he was supposed to get people to believe in God. He healed the sick, tended to the downtrodden and taught very important things that did not require belief in God. The church was melded with the government at the time. They had no trouble believing in God, and probably believed god to be every bit as bad as what they saw all around them and as taught by the church at the time which was so faulty they branded christ a heretic and a blasphemer.
Jesus christ did actual important work.
Honestly RF, have you ever read the “Lords Prayer”!!!
Are you folks bolder now that Pence is VP and thinks it doesn’t matter what you say about gays or do to them because God is eternally damning them…
All the fucking idiots are going to crawl out of the woodwork now
This is a joke post right… I knew you’d ask that, that’s why I said the part about “You claim teaching is an attack even though you presumably try to teach”
I’m not going to type 100 pages to refute your non referring bullshit when I can start with one sentence.
That’s the difference between smart and stupid, wise and unwise…
You think walls of text make you smart, they make you an idiot.
Let me explain something to you.
When I was younger, I used to think that my 100 page book was brilliant… it wasn’t…
Now I’m down to a half page
Yes that is interesting. The logical probability of reversible fact is really a long shot: which proves the level of intelligence required to predict it’s future course. How could have they know: The ancient Hebrew scholars were acquainted with Plato’s De Amina, after all they were under Roman domination.
So the reversibility was based on the presumption that some day faith will eclipse knowledge.
But they couldn’t have predicted another reversal, could they.
I said that some would view teaching as an attack, not that it was in all cases. You took what I said and applied it as a blanket cover for all and tried to make it sound stupid.
Not all walls of text are brilliant, but mine are. If there were simpler ways of saying the same things without it being too ambiguous and too able to be taken a variety of ways to appease the spoiled, I would gladly simplify and reduce.
As it is, you’ve not gone into depth on the subject and I doubt that you even could without showing your intention and nature. Walls of text, for you, would be unwise and show too many incongruities, too many inconsistencies since your words would show, much the same they do when reduced and simplified, a lack of good intent.
They word eclipse shows that they at least believed faith and knowledge would have equal ground somewhere in the future, as in an eclipse, both the sun and the moon, or whatever celestial entity came into play in creating an eclipse, do share the same space and equally play into the effect.
The way you speak, you make it sound as though they believed that faith would dwarf knowledge and knowledge would be disregarded, when faith is filled with knowledge and understanding. Faith is never without knowledge, even when it has to fly ‘solo’ and ‘blind’ for a bit.