Just live? …what does that even mean to a self confessed psychotic who exists and claims to be a misrepresentation of reality?…what a desperate state to find yourself in…..total confusion and no reality understanding whatsoever.
.
..and you are full of straw men.. as per.
.
[please don’t spam my thread]
I am not spamming your thread….your posts make a no sense whatsoever…..what do you even mean by your last post? Explain.
You are self confessed psychotic…..and yet you exist …we know that …..and you claim to be a misrepresentation if reality (an illusion) ….and you go on about “just live”….you don’t even know what life is….and you certainly don’t possess it….not reality life….how can an illusion possess reality life?…..lol…..give it a rest….
I’m not spamming your thread I’m commenting on the stupidly of your claims.
True but then wasn’t Christ the King psychoanalyzed after the fact and deemed psychotic?
In addition Marcus Aurelius washed his hands of being responsible what some understand as a necessary politically motivated guilty conscience.
Was He not abandoned, as He cried out?
As a matter of curiosity, what do you believe Jesus had in mind when he said that?
William, whether you believe it or not the bible actually says that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world even though he kept the laws of God perfectly.Therefore,perfection died for imperfection.There was a legal transaction that took place because all of the sins of the world have to be paid for to satisfy a righteous God.In doing so perfection covers imperfection on both the right and left side of the fence….because perfection and imperfection is binary.
@WeeSee
@abc1231
Lately, my trust in Him has coincided what you mean by the fact that mankind is ~ existence is suffering near total loss by the demolition of ideals.
Perfection can’t die!
Apparently not, and that appearance is the ‘fact’ without which it’s impossible to hold on to the certainty that it may not be merely a wager of odds ( to hold).
Otherwise, look all those who have followed up on the loss of idols.
Descartes may have been naive, but was he so intentionally in order to anticipate the coming of being realistic naively?
Sure, but the bah bag black sheep among us need some kind of an assurance among us, that they are living as well.
Of course when you hate your life you despise the suffering of all mortal beings.
The “I am” is not a lifeless binary processing biological machine which is programmed to claim that it exists and doesn’t exist William.
We know that it exists because it needs to exist to claim that it doesn’t exist.
The “I am” is separate from this lifeless automated binary processing biological machine which can’t claim that it doesn’t exist.
It doesn’t possess life…but it exists.
The “I am” ALWAYS out-smarts it.
And isn’t exactly that Descartes naively speaks: I am because I can think? Back in his day there was a big difference between man and machine, only with mass consumerism coming to age with the Industrial Revolution did the difference ameliorate?.
Descartes knew nothing about the I am;awareness;control or consciousness William and was therefore philosophically very naive.
He had no grasp of the difference between automated thoughts and manual thoughts either.
Thoughts are very low down on the psychological hiearchy…just above emotions.
Jesus is speaking metaphorically when He speaks of “life “.
In my experience the vast majority of Christians haven’t a clue as to what Jesus is saying there, or anywhere else for that matter. They mistakenly interpret Jesus’ words through the lens of the Pauline “gospel” instead of allowing His words to speak for themselves.
From what I can tell, you mistakenly interpret the words of Jesus, at least in part, through their mistaken interpretation.
No he isn’t WeSee, he his speaking about actual reality.There is a difference between existence and life…a binary processing biological machines exists but it doesn’t possess life.
The “I am” is life…you have to be separated from the machine.
C’mon, you don’t even understand enough to understand how little you understand. Even worse you lack the humility to admit it. The repeated emphasis that Jesus put on humility seems to be completely lost on you.
You are not a machine WeSee..You have an automated side to your physical nature and it is designed and operates on binary principles in every respect.Mainstream science doesn’t get this yet because it’s disappeared down a rabbit hole having adopted a half logic starting philosophy as a foundation for it.
The whole of the physical cosmos is a perfectly balanced vibratory system held together by attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes and which generates binary software from VIBRATION!!!
Perhaps testing one against the other is like anticipating some conclusion without realizing the premise to be on the same tablet?
Hello Meno. Hope you’re doing well. And hello, Mags, if you’re still out there. Kidding! Hello to everybody and best wishes for the new year. I know it’s a bit late, and I wasn’t sure where to put my message. I thought I would come here and post it in the “I am” thread.
Hello Carleas… Please change the color scheme; it hurts my eyes… And gives me a headache!
Well, everything is inscribed by the same foundational premise. It’s just a matter of how far you go back. Perhaps we all share our own part in a greater consciousness. Wild, man! Did you know that “yes” and “no” mean the same thing? At least if you go far enough back, they do. With nobody in existence to recognize the difference between the two, they are as good as the same thing. When you start introducing perception and language, you start to see something interesting happen. The more perception and language, the further apart “yes” and “no” get. Discrimination is just a field of yeses and nos. I can probably prove this computationally, but I can’t be bothered right now. 
Consciousness is simply a dynamic state. It starts out with no differentiation and becomes differentiated to finally recognize itself in both states. Go way back to find the unity and go forward to find the multiplicity.
At least that is how my caveman brain sees it all.
1 Like