Rene Descartes got it wrong.
“I think,therefore I am” is incorrect.
“I exist,therefore I am” is correct.
I need to exist to claim that I don’t exist.So if I claim that I don’t exist then I am a liar who exists.
I do stuff, therefore, I am stuff.
“I exist therefore I am” … “I exist” is what “I am” means. You aren’t saying anything interesting with that. I don’t think you’ll get far trying to usurp a classic with an obvious shallow tautology.
I have a feeling you don’t know why Descartes said “I think therefore I am”…
I know exactly why Rene Descartes said what he said.The guy was clueless when it came to philosophy.
“I exist,therefore I am”
I need to exist to think and claim that I exist and don’t exist.
I exist because I need to exist to claim that I don’t exist.If I claim that I don’t exist then I’m a liar who exists.
Just because I exist,I don’t exist if I don’t possess life.
There is no life in existence and non existence.
We are not necessarily the thinking that we do. We are not our thoughts. The character of our thinking is shaped by our own character… which is shaped by our choices we “exist” or “manifest“. That is why we are told to hold every thought captive. Examine it. Don’t just let assumptions fly around untested. This was an issue settled between Descartes and Hobbes back when it was originally a misunderstanding (on Hobbes’ part)—although it is an endemic meme to this day.
You exist Ichthus …everyone exists because they need to exist to claim that they don’t exist.Anyone who claims that they don’t exist is a liar.
The thing is it’s possible to exist and not posses life in which case you don’t exist.
Just because I’m not fluent in how functions/predicates work in logic (yet) doesn’t mean yada yada yada yada yada. That is your personal failure, not mine.
Existence is not life Ichthus…..even though you DO exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist (proving that the claim,I don’t exist is a lie) there is no guarantee that you possess life.
The philosophical debate has moved on now to existence and life.
Forget the “I think therefore I am” philosophical nonsense.
You can’t do anything,even think the two claims “I exist” and “I don’t exist” if you don’t first exist.
Existence is therefore separate from thoughts.
I think we might be saying the same thing.
I am, therefore I think.
But not necessarily the way you do.
Depending on who you are …or what you are (like necessary or contingent).
I exist because I need to exist to claim that I don’t exist.If I claim that I don’t exist then I am a liar who exists.
I am either alive or dead in my existence.
You/I/we always have capacity to exist life, Jupi. But since life is eternal…you/I/we can’t just exist life apart from the source of life without denaturing it (defacing its image in you/me/us).
We’re saying the same thing.
Fine, I unblocked you.
and what is your point! You need it to verified?
The point is that you exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.If you claim that you don’t exist then you are a liar who exists.So we have established that there are a lot of deluded liars who exist claiming that they don’t exist.
The fact that you exist doesn’t mean that you possess life.You can exist and you can be dead and claim things because existence has got absolutely nothing to do with life.
The debates about the existence or non existence of a God are not happening in the physical reason4motion.They are happening in the metaphysical.
They’re not mutually exclusive. In actuality, they are mutually productive.
This is not an either/or situation. The more you seek, the more you find.
You are either dead or alive in the spirit Ichthus.
The soul is separate from the lifeless binary processing biological machine body bot.
The spirit is separate from the physical body bot. and the soul.
There is a difference between formal and final, and in that sense you could say formal is dead (empty, capacity/potential unfulfilled) and final is alive (full, fulfilled—and only One has maximal greatness) — but there is no such thing as absolutely dead or empty, but there are varying degrees of fullness, just like there is a difference between good and evil, and there’s no such thing as absolute evil (it is privative on the good and cannot stand alone), but there are weightier matters of the law (and only One has fulfilled it).
You are either absolutely alive or absolutely dead in the spirit Ichthus even though you claim things and will continue to claim things, even if you depart from your physical body, in your EXISTENCE!!!
Don’t delude yourself.
Well that’s where you’re absolutely dead wrong.
It’s part of my hesitancy of articulating the harmonic triads. They are not going to be without controversy.
The soul has got absolutely nothing to do with the lifeless binary process biological machine body bot. Ichthus.
They are totally separate…..no connection whatsoever.
The soul (the individual) interprets varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves emitted from vibrating matter remember.
I have explained the science to support this in other posts.