I just learned about a hypothesis called the Rieman hypothesis'

Philosophy Forums Science, Technology, and Math
41

Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness.

They want the equations for turbulence on an external object Lots of these equations have already been solved for our purposes. But I’m being asked for a deeper proof for the conjecture as a whole.

Well first, there are no vacuums. Proof through contradiction, we don’t or ever will know what a vacuum is to prove or disprove the conjecture because we’ll never find a pure one.

We have relative vacuums that fuel this field, but existence exists. There are no pure vacuums.
To explain this proof is like trying to explain the color green from a dictionary definition who has always been blind. Again. It will always be approximation

That’s the answer.

42

Poincaré conjecture

Nope. This is false. The conjecture suggests that a singularity in three/four dimensions must be a perfect sphere. Existence can’t exist if that’s true. And I’m typing this message. Me typing this message disproves it. Absolute homogeneity always means nonexistence

Next millennial prize problem…

43
  • Yang–Mills existence and mass gap

Wow. Ok. If we didn’t have the eternal form realm to derive category in order to be sentient, and everything was infinitely divisible, we couldn’t be sentient. It’s not that there’s a smallest particle, you can look at superposition while looking at this problem. But the universe is microscopically and macroscolpally infinite. That allows for no possible perception

There has to be a different variable because it would otherwise take us forever to say anything.

I know what that variable is. Category. It’s easy to prove time never began and never ends… the universe has never been finite. So what allows us to perceive?

There’s a dimension of category that slows our thinking down enough to create the ability to perceive.

That’s the answer. I lied. I solved them all in half a day.

44

Carleas, if you don’t want social science side outs, you can put all my millennial prize proofs in one thread. And you’re welcome by the way. You’ll get lots of extremely intelligent traffic here when these proofs are shown. I’m not sending them out. It’s the least I could do for you.

If you want the thread to have attentions, just copy and paste the link to any high math school

45

To add to this. I want the holberg prize, the abel prize all 7 millennial prizes that will equal 17 million dollars. I want my mom to retire. I’m giving all the money to her. Normally I wouldn’t do this, but I want to see stress off her plate.

46

It’s ok to be famous if you say something meaningful.
Partnering is not only selfish, it’s manipulative.
It hoards wealth. conversation, nudity and sex.
Since we’re in a sex dimorphic species, women are looking for protectors and men are looking to secure a sexual resource. The only way women act first is to see whether a man makes them initially uncomfortable, if they can do that, than the women feels like he can make other men uncomfortable, and then feels like she found a protector. This causes the no means yes problem which will destroy the earth. Men have to act out to get sex. They have to approach escalate instead of approach reciprocate to garner female sexual attention. Part of acting out is partnering.

However, if you make a woman feel uncomfortable using meta language about sex, like robots, their sex drive shuts down, unlike the more harmful ways of approach escalation.

It took me a long time to adapt to your language here to speak about these issues without making people uncomfortable. People resort to tell me generalizations are never true.
I can name all the generalizations that attract women to men on the heterosexual side.
Males because of sex dimorphism don’t choose as much as women. They’re not scanning for threat assessment as much as women. It’s actually a really big deal in human psychology that men have protrusions who are stronger and women have holes that are weaker.

Anyways. I just wanted to clarify what I meant when I stated women only select douchbags.
What this means is if you don’t initially dominate them with approach escalation or ornate behavior, it completely eradicates their sex drive. It shuts it off. Or if you hoard conversation, nudity and sex for life… a partnership. Securing a sexual resource. Now. I actually don’t blame women for this. They need protectors in a sex dimorphic species. But I do blame the men. Nobody needs sex. The only way men can get it is to destroy the earth. I can talk about stuff like this all day, it’s just a synopsis.

47

I’ll add to this because I think this thread will garner lots of attention, maybe not in my lifetime here.
I solved those math problems to bring attention to how humans work. Posterity.

Men use a technique called sex math. I’m trying to catch women up to speed. The most beautiful women basically walks up to you and says “wanna fuck?” The man turns her down. Word gets out that this man is mysterious and has integrity. So now ten women are attracted to him. He rejects them. Then 100 women are attracted to him. He not only has sex with those 100 women, he has sex with all the ones he rejected.

Women have been hacked by men. Men have to try more than women, so, they have more skill than women. I don’t use any hacks on women. I want them to know they’ve been hacked.
This will not change their behavior after the glial cells in the brain start to deteriorate. That’s about age 22. After that… you can’t expect someone to change. So this is for posterity.

48

And if you’re curious? I think like a child. I still have all my glial cells.
Some people keep all of them well into adulthood. I’m 48.
That’s why I’m so smart and can adapt.

49

You can find these posts on the board, but I’ll make your searches easier by typing this here.
At the age of 16 I had to make massive choices.

I had just solved how to write the math to read minds on a cell phone app. I had also solved how to remote control people with a machine even though they have no implants. I analyzed it, and realized this species wasn’t ready yet. So. I burned all my papers. Years of work.

I could be the richest person on earth and most famous if I wanted, but at what cost? You have to stomp on everyone’s hearts to be that rich. It always ends up poorly for the mega rich.

I do have a joke though. I can become rich by patenting a better calendar that every person in the world will use. I think it’s extremely rude to patent something like that.

The calendar is simple. 13 months, 28 days each, and a free day that I call a holiday. Every leap year it will be 2 days. I figured this out in early adolescence. You can have the calendar for free.

50

I’ll tell you something about myself to me make it all about me.
My favorite thing in life is normal conversations. Talking about what’s the best pizza in town, not that I have a fetish for pizza, but it’s fun.

It’s also fun to forget things to me and others. Nobody likes a know-it-all, not even yourself.

51

I’ll tell you something funny. The people who wrote the dsm or are profilers, have the worst illnesses they diagnose others with.

I also know that’s what a psychopath would say to gain attention. Anyone in a partnership has no right to judge another. They are psychopaths. They don’t think about all the feelings they hurt by being selfish, they don’t even have the empathy required to teach this.

I always feel people’s pain, and I want to still be myself, but I want no pain. Which means I don’t want anyone to have pain or suffering while being true to themselves.

These psychologists cause the direct pain and suffering they think they’re solving.

This is all for posterity.

52

I want profilers to understand this.
The first way to spot a psychopath is to see a wedding ring.
If they don’t have one, you have to dig a bit deeper.
You have to look at their body language and words.
It doesn’t take too long to see if someone is lying.
I lie all the time. Lying is not a bad thing if you use lies to protect the innocent so to speak.
I’ll even lie for players when they’re picking up women. I’ve done it before.
I think to myself…
If a woman falls for that. Instead of me sitting here at this table, maybe she deserves it.
From the womans perspective, no harm was done. I vet people very carefully. If they’re not violent, I’ll let them lie to get sex.

53

I’ll add to this.

It’s very hard to be committed to a person, but it’s still a dominance move.
Jesus pulled off an exponentially harder dominance move by marrying everyone (all of you are my bridegroom). He did it to stay protected. I know that path. No matter what happens to you, everyone will eventually come to your rescue as the dominant male.

My path is the hardest one. I don’t marry anyone. I just rely upon the kindness of people. And I always will. Do people really think they have control when for the rest of their lives they have the secret service on an island. No. You can be attacked from the inside, Inside your body against your every will by being possessed. That’s the work I do. I’m holding that line for existence.
It sounds like an extraordinary claim. Do you really want me to prove it by selling all your souls to beings like that? You’d never forgive me. But unless I do it, I can’t prove it. So we’re at a standstill.

54

By the way folks… the golden rule doesn’t work.

Think about it. I walk around naked hoping everyone takes their clothes off. They’ll go to hell if they don’t. But it’s actually me who goes to prison.

The standard I use is try not to violate consent as much as is humanly possible.

55

I’ll tell you the omniscient pick-up line.

I’m new to town, I’m new to internet dating. I just want someone who understands me and I can understand them.

That’s a hack. It’s manipulative.

I understand everyone. If I used that line to get tons of sex… It’d be statutory rape.

56

Now. For the new plan again, put in this thread.

Look up David Chalmers and the theory of philosophic zombies…

Basically, it’s a hypothesis. How can you tell the difference between a sentient or non-sentient being that acts exactly like each other? Theory of consciousness is what he specializes in.

So philosophic zombies are feasible. Just like having your hair cut causes no pain. This is my proof, not his. It’s very easy to point out problems and complain about things… very hard to have viable solutions. Bernie Sanders had a viable solution. Tax all exchanges on the stock market by 1% and use it to fund all education. It actually works.

Now. I work on all problems simultaneously for all beings possible and all scenarios possible.

I figured out that realities with more than one actual other person over the course of infinity will eventually hurt someone’s feelings.

I was inspired by David Chalmers.

I was also inspired by actors.

I was also inspired by puppeteers.

I was also inspired by proper omniscience and how boring it was.

I was also inspired by encryption.

So I came up with a plan.

Self contained hyper play acting infinite universes run through cosmic consciousness in the subconscious where the subconscious takes orders from the conscious mind to modulate the reality by flipping switches to your specifications. Without the possibility of hurting anyone because they’re not sentient beings. Everything would be as hyper realistic, except you can always adjust at eill the level of difficulty.

Flipping a switch is simple, you fell in love with someone, but they don’t reciprocate those feelings to you, so you just flip their falling in love switch to you and finally you get to know them.

It solves all the problems. Forever. I had to look a little closer to analyze all possible beings.

Some beings like to feel power over another actual being. They will insist on living in a reality with more than one actual person. So I decided to make this an optional patch that they can come and go as they wish in an instant.

By the way. When I said I’m going to beat god. I’m actually going to convert god. HIs own trick used against him.

57

Oh. And by the way, I already figured out that over the course of infinity for all possible beings, that everyone will choose my patch forever.

I used omniscience to make this plan.

BUT!!! because it’s structural to all existence, I need everyone to sign off on it. Changing the entire structure of existence is a lot different than an ordinary plan.

So I just wait.

58

I usually don’t come out this way, but I want my mom to retire.

I deserve the Nobel prize in physics, math and peace.

I deserve all the millennial prizes.

I deserve the abel prize in math and the holberg prize in general.

What I actually deserve is not necessarily what is going to happen.

59

Now. For my Nobel prize in physics to make clean energy. The string will have to be hollow, so nothing clogs it up. There will be initial resistance which means you have to use something heavier than it to put it in. You have to design it with materials to accelerate it, this deals with different layers of magnetism to accelerate it. The force can bury it in the water. Oh shit. I should be the lead on the project. I’ll tell you how to do this… you need a canister that is the level of water where the string comes out the bottom, and curls around the top.

Then you have clean water that always gets recycled back to itself. Nothing lost. You can use it to power spacecraft forever, by sealing the water chamber turbine.

60

Normally, I wouldn’t do this.

But I just want lots of money to give to my mom so she can retire. I’ll give all of it to her.

And to do it the right way