This is a goal which will draw tremendous seething hatred and also respect.
I have unwittingly embarked on the project if being the first human who deserves sex or resources.
If there is a calling, that’s my calling, that is the Essense of my life’s path… And taking the long view, and playing it as it lays, is my goal.
I want to know to the depths of my being if life is good or evil, worth living or not living. That to me is living fully!
So your goal in life is to have sex?
Nah, sex is easy, I want to be the first person who didn’t steal it.
What about buying it?
…The “essence of your life’s path” could be a few thousand dollars, I would guess. Or less, if you go for that.
A few thousand dollars? What, is their vagina made out of diamond?
Hamburger of Cheese,
No, not diamonds… but a cut above your mother.
Unfunny
That sounds like it might be offensive.
I’ve already paid for it by solving ethics.
I’m not spending a damn penny.
I’m not going to flirt or escalate with contradiction or any of that theft garbage.
Nope, I’ve already earned it, the question is whether I get it, without using techniques to steal it.
Women don’t have to pay a damn cent for sex, guys just steal it… Nope, I’m doing it the right way.
Will one of you women fuck him already so he will stop?
I may be the only one who understands the magnitude of this…
I can actually prove whether life is meaningful here, and I’m the only person who can do it.
For some bizarre reason, I’m the guy who solved ethics on the meta level and have a vast reservoir of micro solutions.
That makes me the first person to actually deserve resources, including sex… This is non translatable in terms if precedence. Even if someone was able to corrupt this knowledge that came from me to secure another instance of sex, I’m still the only person who deserves it.
If there is no deserve heirarchy, even the theives are fucked in an ultimate sense - I don’t want to run all the proofs for different combinations of philosophy of life - but I’m very specific about how to find degenerates…
You are the degenerate you call others…
It’s a joke to some degree… Everyone is guilty of stealing and not actually deserving sex and resources here and throughout history here. Bomb them with books!
It’s absurdly transparent who the theives are and what they stand for.
All of this evolved from my philosophy of reference, not interfering with rationality, and of course the meta solution to ethics.
Once I figured out that I’m the only person in history who actually deserves resources using my technique, I realized the magnitude of it…
Sure, someone can potentially use my technique (likely mess it up) but they already secured a resource that they didn’t deserve initially, which makes it exponentially easier to use my technique, as the originator without many ties, I have to, I am forced to earn it from ground zero, without having abused the system as much as others to be where I am. So… I’m the person , only person, who can LEAST steal or not deserve resources.
Sure I’ve made mistakes to get here, and I work my ass off to set things a right as I can.
My journey is not your journey, but we all have a stake in what I learned, not just me.
Congratulations, if that’s true. The holy grail. And fast.
So what’s next?
Have you ever had sex before Ecmandu? With a woman?
You can get a decent hooker around a college campus for a couple hundred bucks.
OP, go to backpage and click escorts.
I think it is ironic and really rather amazing that you have come up with a religious goal. You will deserve sex which implies some objective criterion is met. You talk about your life’s path, and then about knowing if life is good or evil. It is like the return of the repressed, a neo-Christian mission.
I was actually going to type a long reply, but I’ve made my arguments elsewhere. Everyone knows you have to be bad to follow the formula of getting women, and that’s all I really need to say.
If religion is right and wrong, then why try bother pointing out how absurd I am. It makes you look like an asshole who uses the conspicuous consumption of contradiction frequency to get sex and resources, and is laughable as a rebuttal.
You’re either being illogical on purpose to acquire resources, or you want religion to own philosophy…
Philosophy is higher than religion.
Either way… I can see how you got sex.
If everyone knows then this is not very original.
I don’t know where you got the idea I thought it was a rebuttal. It was precisely what it presented itself as. An observation of something ironic and to a degree I found amazing. If you think I will get any resources, let alone sex, for having pointed out contradictions in your posts, you are confused about women, sex and likely psychology in general also. In fact this accusation makes no sense, and, does not function as a rebuttal of what I wrote. And clearly is not an attempt at rebutting it. Just to show I can distinguish between the various kinds of posts. It might be useful for you to do this also.
There’s a difference between knowing it and articulating it, and knowing it and actually being a social advocate of it. And the amount if detail I understand the topic is original and the solution to ethics is original.
You’re defending the female denial system AND using something called contradiction, which is a form of conspicuous consumption by calling truth ironic, when you have to state a truth to say it.
Your whole post was nonsense.
Daaaaammmmmmmmnnnnnn.