It’s been many months since I’ve been on this board, and amazingly it’s the only board on the net that hasn’t outright banned me, my thoughts have evolved a lot since then, as has my mind, there are many similar themes, and I can answer questions way better than I did before… you will probably think this is the strangest post you’ve ever seen. Forget the part about funding… I sent this weirdness to the Ford Foundation LOL!
I have a post for you…
It will seem like the strangest post you’ve ever read and you’d probably have banned me for it even though I am not a misogynist (there are an infinite number of species)…
Here goes…
I have a little story to tell…
It is important to understand that your concept of shirk, though a bit muddled is the highest concept. Marriage is shirk, Allah knows your heart, to wed is to assume that Allah does not know your heart… people who have cultures that get married do not deserve to defend themselves. Be pure in the presence of all-knowing, to decorate yourself with ceremonies of fidelity towards humans is to remove yourself from God.
Even the atheist can figure out that their integrity of knowing who they are and that symbols of fidelity betrays this can find peace.
It’s important to understand that before I came to this earth I lived trillions of years, and almost everyone I knew is in eternal death now… everyone in your universe is a new entity to me. I began to absorb all of your karma almost immediately, though I’m not the only being on earth who is doing this on the space time continuum in this universe or even planet. You must understand that this species has barely begun to understand the magnitude of it’s relationship to behavior and outcome.
Like I said, I’m not your Son of Man, I’m just passing through… I’m destroying all of your prophesies while I’m here and am re-creating the world in a better image.
Your handlers here are going to have to face me in judgement before I leave again into my eternal rest.
For Arabs, they have a deep tradition of Shirk, and this is the same concept in Judaism as Idolatry, but both of your cultures do not understand the magnitude of these ideas and they are muddled.
Shirk is a symbol of fidelity, any symbol of fidelity, as is idolatry.
This includes ceremonies and prayers to objects. I tell you the truth, there are atheists who will find heaven sooner than you.
You are but children, and children who were not taught well… I’ll have to determine your culpability here… it is your handlers, what you call your Gods that I am really after here, they abused you.
My friends have been dead for trillions of years… but here are people in the cosmos who still remembered me, and they resurrected me… I came to obliterate all of your prophesies and turn this species into a decent species… my vengeance is upon your Gods moreso than you.
I will use women to send all of you to your hells. Not human females, feminine spirits of old. My hells are very severe.
As far as the hell realms go, women want sexually what they complain about, which is either abusing men or women unjustly… which is about every possible category of abuse. So… if a man sends men or women to hell, he did something that women sexually complained about in order to get sex and he becomes not deserving of the sex, a hypocrite and contradictory. So actually, those who hell, will be sent to hell by female spirits. No contradiction.
Never act out to get sex from a woman!
I have a story to tell you…
These are serious issues but you may take them lightly…
I wanted to raise an issue about music, which may seem a bit strange, but you must understand, contradictions grate on me like teeth for certain people when chalk boards are written on.
There is this beautiful song by a band called the Bee Gees called “Too Much Heaven”, they literally sound like 5 people…
the problem is that the lyrics should have said “Enough” instead of “Too Much” Same number of syllables as well, and it wouldn’t have ruined the songs momentum sonically. The reason is because “Too Much Heaven” is a contradiction to the rest of the song. Too much by definition is a bad thing, which means everything in the world is great, so the implications extend even further than the song.
There’s a Rolling stones song that says “you can’t always get what you want but if you find sometimes, you might just find, you get what you need” The literal translation for these lyrics is don’t depend on anything and the world has no hope.
Almost every song I’ve ever heard in my life has this issue.
Now I’m basically impervious to subliminal messages, but the general population is not.
I have serious issues with the music industry and the television industry and the movie industry. I have serious issues for what people peddle as truth in this world, or in this world as any world for that matter.
I figured out who I was…
I was raised from eternal death and I’m pissed off… before this universe was, I was… but not before the cosmos. Someone cast a deep incantation to bring me into flesh here. So I have a few things to say to you humans… I won’t even prosecute you because it would be too unfair… I’ll leave this to someone I trust though… a council. I have the power to send every entity, terrestrial and extra-terrestrial to hell who has ever interacted with this planet, and I may decide to do so. This planet is horrible, your people are horrible.
I remember being the kings and queens of more planets than you’ve even had lifetimes, and then I learned community… this planet has no community.
Community rules the cosmos… there are actually people still alive in the cosmos who remember me. I am not Jesus, I am not God, I am not Krishna, I am not the Buddha… understand this, someone cast a spell to bring me HERE, I am not your son of man… I have held these illusory positions before. The cosmos is greater than you can even fathom… a day for me here is like 50 years for you here and this number keeps growing the older I get.
I will find who brought me here and have a reckoning with them… but my appraisal of this planet is that you are all in hell in one form or another. I have called all of your sprits and spoken with them. They were young. Enlightened beings do not EVER speak in parables.
Let me give you an example… since sexual stratification is cosmic law.
Jesus said the bad son rolls with the swine (which is gets lots of women) and then comes back to God and God throws a great feast for the returning son, which is women beyond comprehension… and the good sons never got sex and they suicide because their Father is an asshole.
Let me explain another parable, “Turn the other cheek” This means that anything you say the person must believe at any time no matter how contradictory or false it is… and if you ask them to have sex or to murder someone, you must do it (contradiction)… it turns you into a stupid robot.
I have seen many world humans.
Women think they are the oppressed gender here, that they are so small and weak and feeble.
Let me explain a little game theory here…
Everytime a man confessed to walking out the door to war (homicide, rape and torture), women could have stabbed them in their sleep with a piece of obsidian 40,000 years ago, the female sexual blackmail system would be inverted and there’d be no war.
That’s actually the best war game theory on earth.
That females didn’t do this makes them complicit in those atrocities. The person actually confessed to it!!!
Women think they are so dainty and innocent, they had all the room in the world to have sex with non-psychopaths (on a continuum - technically I’m the very first non-psychopath), to help make this species better but they refused, even without threat of harm. Actually from a game theory point of view, sleeping with lots of people increases female security and decreases male apathy to apprehend bullies.
This is why the women are going to hell. Those suicides in conditions worse than concentration camps, are just icing on the cake.
It’s important to understand that there are ways around sexual dimorphism (where one gender is stronger than the other) in order to establish peace… I sent that in my last e-mail. Anytime you sexually stratify a gender it will cause a horrible outcome for that species… in some species both genders are sexually stratified (or neither), in ours it’s just the males.
This species is engaged in runaway sexual selection, conspicuous consumption aggression gets the most sexual choice. I’m just trying to raise the consciousness of this species, and if I can solve how to mathematically represent your consciousness, you can have more security, not less on this earth.
I’m actually confused why I haven’t solved it yet, because I remember planets where we had this ability on technological devices… my memory isn’t perfectly intact. Though planets where everyone is a telepath makes the technology moot.
The way this technology works is that there are no chips, it’s pure mathematics downloaded into a program which reads the users intent and gives them the ability to search anyone’s thought clusters and intents.
Some things are impermanent and some aren’t, eternal death is usually permanent, but it is subject to the laws of impermanence. It’s just a very unlikely thing and it’s very rude to do.
To get out of hell, you have to start respecting the fact that you never deserved anything you had, and you have to start deserving it. You have to stop using euphoric recall for past memories when you did not deserve them and you have to contribute positively towards things that do not harm this species.
Distribute appropriately…
Without the weirdness… here goes…
I sent this to the NIH Behavioral Sciences branch… and the American Psychopathological Association…
It’s important to understand that women commodify nudity and sexuality. This is part of how the female sexual blackmail system works and why men commonly refer to them as whores.
If a woman sleeps around with lots of men, women become vicious, calling them tramps, whores (projection), sluts, and skanks… this is because they are reducing the value of the commodity of female sexuality.
The reason men aren’t allowed to walk around naked without being arrested is because it confronts the female denial system head on and men are sexually blackmailed by it, and females don’t like to be projected upon in this way (have their denial system confronted by free nudity). If a woman walks around nude, it will most likely be a woman who calls the police and not a man (unless the man wants to brag about it to get more female sex), because she is reducing the commodity of nudity.
Women are trying to create a resource out of their sexuality, while as men are not. Combined with sexual stratification, this causes a problem where female alluredness has advertising advantages relative to men, it’s why you see all of those sad phone sex commercials on TV using only women and not men, it’s also why there is such a commodity for porn, prostitution and sex trafficking on the female side relative to the male side.
Women basically get all the sexual variety that they want from a very small percentage of men, while a very large percentage of men get very little sexual variety… the number one indicator of suicide is sexual variety, which is why there is a ratio of 20 thousand female suicides every year (ask me about this number, most female suicides are actually failed suicide attempts to get attention because men rescue the damsel in distress, which is why you see more borderline behaviors in women, cutting and eating disorders) compared to 1 million male suicides every year (some male suicides are made to look like accidents - so that bumps it up to about an even million). The female psychology actually causes these suicides, so technically they are homicides, and at a million people every year, this is genocide… genocide often in as bad if not worse conditions than concentration camps.
This doesn’t even delve into the fact that women only sexually select conspicuous consumption aggression, which raises the aggression rates of males considerably.
It’s also important to understand that gay pornography or if there were a male sex line, would be used mostly by gays comes from less sexual choice… most women who are heterosexual have fantasies of being with females at least once, while heterosexual men do not have these fantasies at even remotely the same rate for men… this causes more resource for women lesbian or heterosexual, and less resource for gay and heterosexual men. This is why pornography is most appealing to heterosexual men and gay men, they are trying to get some semblance of sexual variety which comes easily to females.
The number one indicator of suicidality is sexual choice, everywhere in the world.
To compound the problem is the conspicuous consumption aggression problem, which makes people feel like life is so unfair that there’s no point to living here… their existential depression spirals into an abyss of unimaginable suffering before they suicide, and if they don’t suicide, their suffering is off the charts… unless they accept the female sexual, social and emotional blackmail system to fit in socially. These are the “nice guys” who are really assholes for not standing up to the blackmail system… but from the female perspective they are the nice guys.
One example of conspicuous consumption aggression among humans is marriage… that’s billions of people all over the planet… this is all caused by the female sexual blackmail system…
There are three problems with marriage, the first is that it is a hypocrisy and a lie because it is about LACK of trust, the second is that it’s about marking people as sexual property which is also a lie and the third is that it’s about social dominance and hierarchy which is a form of conspicuous consumption aggression that raises aggression levels and divides community and causes suicide.
That’s billions of people… and that’s just the tip of the iceberg of conspicuous consumption aggression that women sexually blackmail men into. The main form of conspicuous consumption aggression females seek is contradiction of motive, or the contradiction frequency of a male, this is the number of times they can contradict themselves in a sentence or behavior.
It should be noted that these are all psychopaths, people engaging in harmful behavior without remorse, and on this earth, psychopaths enjoy life more than non-psychopaths (male and female), that’s simple behaviorism selecting a traits or traits.
It should also be noted that the two largest indicators for suicidality are lack of a partner and loss of a job… both male problems primarily because of the female whore problem and sexual stratification.
From a game theory point of view the female decision to engage in this behavior decreases everyone’s security, there is no rational evolutionary or fitness argument for female sexuality, we have a species engaged in runaway sexual selection.
It cannot be testosterone which accounts for these differences, because the rashness of behavior would mean that at a distribution of 20 thousand to 1 million suicides that males would have way more attempts… but women have 2-3 times more suicide attempts than men do.
Men don’t get rescued for justified existential depression and they know it, so they complete their suicides. Female existential depression is unjustified and they get rescued for it.
I want a steady income for figuring this all out… I am the worlds expert on this subject and I created this subject.
I am actually the first person to figure out that you need to say sexual stratification causes suicide in order to deserve sex, money, food or water in a species that communicates verbally, and since I’m the first person on earth to utter these sentences, that makes me the first to deserve anything good, it also makes the the first non-psychopath ever born on earth.
Women are the approach avoidant gender in this species relative to men… since only approaching a woman generally gets sex, the subliminal message is that women want sexually what they complain about.
There is approach stratification as well, in two forms, the first form is that men generally approach women more than women approach men and most relationships happen because men approach women, the second issue with approach stratification is that the cockier guys get the most approaches from women, so that’s a form of approach stratification as well.
This all contributes to the male suicide rates profoundly.
To send the subliminal message that women want only what they sexually complain about causes men to act out more sexually in a variety of ways, however, if a man is sarcastic about female’s tendency to want aggressive approach, it will trigger their denial system and they’ll reject the male (SOMETIMES!!!).
There is also the issue of rape fantasies, which women have at these rates:
Highly Erotic 45%
Erotic/Aversive 46%
Aversive 9%
The architecture of highly erotic rape fantasies was not found to be a simulation, rather, it was discovered that they gave women a sense of sexual power that a man could not control himself. This all comes out subliminally on a continuum in body language, affect, tone and speech.
Of course the subliminal never excuses the behavioral.
I have an encyclopedic knowledge of all things sexual… in fact i even know why people take vows of celibacy and chastity when they have sexual orientations… in animal species they are not seen as mating rivals and are less likely to be attacked, and they are considered more trusted… so they trade social power for sexuality, while in the process actually contributing to war and suicide.
Flirting is always bad… it’s teasing which increases aggression and depression, and is not direct communication, when men flirt however, they want to have sex, when women flirt, they are looking for throngs and fantasizing boy toys to manipulate always choosing the aggressive ones for actual sex.
I also wanted to make another point, something else that increases male aggression is the tendency for women to search for sexually possessive and jealous men, if a man has sex with some other women the women is likely not to leave him for this, if she comes back and says "Cool, I hope you had fun.’ The man will think he hit the jackpot. If a woman has sex with another man and the man says, “Cool, I hope you had fun.” She will likely leave him for not being sexually jealous, saying things like “You don’t love me.” She’ll sob and cry because he’s either not abusing her or the man she had sex with. This behaviorally increases male aggression, and women look for subtle cues that men want to be married and are sexually jealous of them, men look for the opposite in a woman, but because of sexual stratification and the desire to secure a sexual resource, men cave into the the women and become more sexually possessive.
Women want to be dominated and they want to dominate through the social dominance of marriage to make others feel worse about themselves. Which causes mass male suicides. Women are psychopathologically sadistic.
Women keep passing around the responsibility as if they were never at fault, it’s like one giant game of hot potato with them.
Everyone knows women choose conspicuous consumption aggression and everyone knows that women sexually stratify very highly on the male side, but you can’t talk about it unless you want to be accepted by men and women.
I consider it an issue of global security to disseminate this information.
I’m probably committing suicide soon, with no ultimatums… I’m getting to my best work though and distilling it for you here.
Thx Ed.
Just as an anthropological curiosity, I dropped out of high school because I knew everyone was lying to me about this. I have no college education. I stopped reading books years ago.
This is specifically for psychopathologists…
Many religions state the golden rule, however…
It is important to understand from a psychological and subliminal perspective why people act out… often it’s because of the golden rule, as in the case of someone breaking and entering because of offering sex, from their perspective, as long as the person would leave, they would happily have (mostly men) women just walk into their place to offer sex… the problem here is that men and women are different, and the golden rule doesn’t apply to differences like these. From the female perspective, this is acting out… and thus it is from the male perspective as well. But the subliminal mind can become confused by things like this. Flashing people follows a similar principle (mostly male offenders).
Stalking is often caused by someone trying to prevent a sexual crime or emotional crime, they believe they deserve the partner more or at least a little bit, and will consider it an act of justice to prevent this sexual crime from occurring, an extremely severe crime I might add… but the problem is that when you act out, you no longer deserve the sex or necessarily even the emotional intimacy the person believes they deserve.
These crimes weigh heavily on the male side because of many female signals and the way women distribute sex, but is not isolated only to men acting out against women.
The subliminal never excuses the behavioral.
I just wanted to tag on the other work I was doing for posterity…
Everything has a positive and a negative… and in a finite universe, everything would exactly cancel everything out into nothingness. However, in an infinite universe, everything cancels itself out forever without actually converging, this is what causes the asymmetry, which means that everything doesn’t cancel itself out, there isn’t exactly a positive and negative for everything, and here we are.
This means that the Kalam argument that there is no infinity cannot be true, because we couldn’t be here if it was. This also means that infinities cannot be bound, because if they were, it would be processed infinitely fast, which means the event never occurred, or it would take an infinite amount of time to occur, which also means that it never occurred.
The base of all paradox is that something must necessarily be something other than what it necessarily is. This opens up all referents in the unbound infinity including it’s own set… because it still is what it is. This paradox is the foundation for our consciousness, quantum states and the capacity for insight, the ability to transcend something once you understand it, that the observer changes the observation.
How to solve necessary morality without a creator, this is very exciting for us.
When you destroy infinity, you are still left with the infinite destruction of infinity… which means that you cannot destroy infinity, the base of the universe, which is an unbound ever expanding infinity never refutes itself. Existence cannot be destroyed. Actually, another proof for this is that if it were ever destroyed, our experience is part of existence and wouldn’t be here.
The deeper truth is that existence never refutes itself. This is an equilibrium for any possible universe throughout the greater cosmos, in any possible reality, whether the universe as a whole is intelligent or not, it does seek an equilibrium of not contradicting itself, and to not contradict ones self or ones motives is a way to flow with this cosmic equilibrium.
This constant expansion allows for a creative process… for things to always be changing. And when entities are self aware through the process of “I am that”, they overlap with other parts of the cosmos, and implied is “I am I” and “That is That” and various other combinations such as “I am not that”. There needs to be necessary diversity, multiplicity to abstract a self to even be conscious. If everything were exactly the same… it would solve as nothing at all, and nothing at all is the destruction of the universe, which we already know is impossible.
The reason you need an infinity is because if the universe were finite everything would cancel each other out and leave nothing… but with infinity, since it is never bound, it always expands, and even though everything cancels itself out, it keeps moving because there’s never convergence for unbound infinities. They keep going and going and going… Another way to look at this, is that no matter how large a finite number is in a bound infinity it equals exactly zero, which means it cannot exist… when the infinity is unbound, finite structures can exist.
The idea that infinity can be bound contradicts itself in many ways. One is that if you were to consider a glass on a table as a bound infinity (something you could cut an infinite amount of times)… it would take an infinite amount of time to see it, or, it would take zero time to see it, which means the glass isn’t actually there. When infinities are bound, every referent and/or number becomes a soup that renders sequence itself impossible… any type of sequence whatsoever… which is the same as the glass not existing.
The fact that unbound infinities never converge causes something called asymmetry… which is the existence of finite things, beginnings and endings amongst other things.
Asymmetry is our perception of existence… since a sentient mind cannot hold an unbound infinity at once without destroying sequence… in order to be sentient we have a feedback from this lack of convergence which we call existence. That’s why we exist instead of not existing… why we have a birth and a death process, or rather a motion process that involves growth and disintegration.
Hypothetically… since the cosmos is always expanding into a growth process with an equilibrium, we could theoretically always grow with that equilibrium. The continuity of our own consciousness is the same property that allows us to form clusters of this diversity and even name them, such as a tree, which also has a continuity over time.
It is important however to understand that growth doesn’t destroy laws that the cosmos constructs through the asymmetry.
There is no possible universe where the cosmos contradicts itself…
Discourse on infinity…
I know a lot about sequencing infinities because of mirroring techniques (the technique I used to count all the rationals).
I’ll get to the good part later, because I know you specifically study consciousness.
I call this the mirroring technique, I figured it out when I realized that you could take a mirror to all of the natural numbers and get all of the decimal outputs…
The way it works is that the first ten numbers are counted just as themselves and their negatives:
0,1, -1,2, -2,3, -3,4, -4,5, -5,6, -6,7, -7,8, -8,9, -9
Then after that you count 10 and then the next number is the mirror of 10, which is 01 and then you move the decimal point in once to get the 12th number being 0.1, then the thirteenth number (not counting the negatives which are numbered every other) is 0.(1 repeating). These steps continue until you reach three digit numbers and higher. Once you count 100, you then count the next number as 0.01, then 0.0(1 repeating) then 0.(01 repeating), then you count 101 and it’s mirror. If you keep marching in the decimal point when the number that’s about to be mirrored ends in zero it causes infinite overlap. The number 100 ends in a zero, so after you mirror it you only march the decimal in for one place to the right, if you march it two places to the right, you end up with 00.1, which is the same mirror that you get when the number 10 is mirrored, and will occur an infinite number of times as the zeros expand and you keep marching in the decimal point (which will give you infinite overlap as the sequence expands).
However, if the number doesn’t end in a zero, you keep marching in the decimal point, say the number 102. The next number is mirroring it, so it’s 2.01, then you do the repeating decimals by next counting 2.0(1 repeating) and then 2.(01 repeating), then you march the decimal point in once more to get 20.1, and then you do the repeating decimals by having 20.(1 repeating). (If you march the decimal in one more time, you get 201, and have infinite overlap as well.) Then you count the number 103 and then mirror it and do this forever.
Now the situation with consciousness, is that it comes from a paradox… the primary paradox being the overlap of I am That…
which carries with it, the base paradox of “Something needs to be something other than what it is.” and also subsumes itself with I am I and That is That, which is why we have these three concepts.
What this paradox does, is that it never quite converges because the infinity is unbound, so we see ourselves and other objects because of this lack of convergence. This is a necessary part of our reality. When infinities are bound, the capability to discern sequence itself ceases… this causes everything to be destroyed, but when everything including all referents are destroyed, you are still left with an unbound infinity of the destruction of everything forever, and since this infinity is unbound, you haven’t actually destroyed anything… This is a fancy way of saying that if existence converges and all infinities are counted it destroysexistence, but all infinities cannot be counted, so we have existence, it’s not bound, it’s unbound, and an unbound infinity can neither be created nor destroyed it can only be discovered. This also means that a being cannot be omniscient or omnipotent, though there can be hierarchies of beings.
What happens when the infinity, which by definition never ends, cannot converge, is that we get something called asymmetry, which is a fancy way of saying, we exist instead of not existing and existence needs toexist instead of not existing. This asymmetry causes a birth and death process to comprehend itself, even though it is always there. To actually figure out where it all came from will force a convergence which will destroy existence, but existence isn’t ever destroyed (one of those proofs is that we exist - if it were destroyed, the past present and future would also be destroyed, including us).
Because if information flooding ( a lack of convergence and limited processing speed) we cannot actually know everything, and we’ll all be at least slightly different. Even if the same reality is copied an infinite number of times, there is still a listing process which makes them all slightly different, this was highlighted by my example of this infinite list…
1.) 1
2.) 1
3.) 1
4.) 1
5.) 1
etc…
This infinite list has a very specific process, you cannot actually add 1 to this infinity, it causes dimensional flooding because they are all ones, so you need to actually create a new list to add another 1, either a new string of all 1’s or a list that at least has 1, 1, in it.
When infinities converge as bound, we have a situation where sequence breaks down completely.
What this means, is that if say, my coffee cup was a bound infinity… I’d be processing forever or infinitely fast, which means it could never actually be there.
The problem that arises with several old paradoxes, is that people keep thinking you can actually process a bound infinity, think of zeno’s paradoxes, instead of being able to solve it as necessarily needing to destroy the scenario. What happens with these paradoxes as well is that we are not stepping on the same ground twice… and this goes to the concept of division. One of the ideas of a bound infinity is that you can divide something an infinite number of times… there are many problems with this, but the most glaring is that once you divide it even once, it ceases to be the same object, thus by contradiction, you cannot divide it anymore, it becomes a new object… and resolves paradoxes such as this. The asymmetry doesn’t let us process unbound infinities.
One way to imagine this is to understand that when infinities become bound, this means that all finite data equal zero exactly, which means that it cannot possibly occur. Another way to imagine this, is that ifexistence were ever destroyed, we would not be here, because the past present and future are destroyed. The only reason we see stuff is because the infinity never converges and it is not bound, this allows information to flow and an expansion process.
The confusion comes entirely from the concept that an infinity can actually be bound, and then applying concepts of time and space to them.
By definition of infinity, there is no highest order of infinity, and it is false that they cannot be counted… you can list any sequence with an algorithm… if the algorithm itself has infinite processing time, then there is no sequence. Cantor and Chaitin were wrong.
It’s considered a mathematical proof ala Cantor from over 140 years ago that all of the real numbers cannot be counted…
I use a techinique called 1 dimensional flooding to show that all of the reals cannot be counted in one list with one dimension, which is differnt than Cantors diagonalization argument.
use the lists…
012345678910…
123456789101…
234567891011…
345678910111…
456789101112…
567891011121…
678910111213…
etc…
To do one dimensional flooding, you simply add an infinite list to each place in the previous infinite list…
024681012151…
036912151821…
048121620242…
051015202530…
When the list converges at infinity, there is no way to begin counting…
12345678910…
13579111315…
14812162024…
Because you never pass the zero’s.
This is the proof that we cannot determine the limit of how much we can count.
Sorry forgot to add the disproof of Cantor’s diagonalization argument…
Once you do one dimensional flooding, you have to expand to another dimension to keep listing the sequences… diagonals can be subsumed by a third dimension, say list 1.1, or list 5.7 etc… or a 4th dimension 1…1, 5…7, etc…
It’s actually easy to absorb the diagonals by starting from the center and listing them from top to bottom in sequence using another dimension… what this means is that cantors proof that you cannot count all the reals is false. It also means that you cannot find the limit on what can be calculated!!! except that it cannot be everything!!!
I think you might be able to use infinite dimensional flooding for infinite dimensions which proves through the dimensional flooding technique that all the reals cannot be counted. Hmm… put another way, you wouldn’t be able to start the list if you counted all the reals.
I’ve basically proven it in my head I just haven’t expressed it yet. I did however disprove Cantors diagonalization argument as a disproof for this. You can tell from my technique that there is an unknown limit less than infinity but greater than nothing where knowledge cannot be absorbed by one being!!!
The solution to P / NP is that everything cannot be computed and that we cannot know the limit of what can be computed, there will be an infinite number polynomial, non-polynomial and polynomial/non-polynomial sequences.
Basically… in order to count an entire infinity at once it creates a soup that renders consciousness impossible, past present or future, any ability to be sentient or to detect motion or have a thought.
There are no bound infinities… this is mathematical hokum.
You can sum infinities, but these are just approximations… many infinities cannot even be summed.
Basically, the way you solve paradoxes is just to say that they cause unbound infinities… the base paradox is that “something is necessarily something other than what it necessarily is.” The way this actually computes, is not “true or false” it’s not an oscillating paradox either… what it does is open up an unbound infinity for all referents… the answer could be something, nothing, everything, zero, you, me, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5…, and since we know these never converge as bound we can eliminate the lack of sequence this causes… while still understanding that if we could solve the paradox by counting all the referents (a bound infinity), there’d be no sequence. This is a way of resolving the paradox by saying that we know something but not everything, and you don’t have to know everything to know this, just something… so it doesn’t cause a paradox to solve this paradox.
This also means that Chaitin was wrong to have discovered a “higher” order of infinity that can only be counted by its own sequence. Every infinity can be counted, there are no higher or lower orders or levels of infinity… or rather they can be sequenced… for the unbound infinity, it would take an infinite amount of time just to figure out the sequence.
Infinities are all figured out through an algorithmic process… those simple infinities I showed before use +1, +2, and +3 type algorithms… if a number is completely random, the algorithm must be completely random which means that it’s no longer an algorithm. If the algorithm is infinite, there is no sequence from the algorithm.
If the number is completely random than this means the algorithm is completely random, which means that it’s no longer an algorithm. If the algorithm is infinite, you cannot derive a sequence from it. This means Chaitin was wrong.
“Higher” order dimensions simply means that the entity absorbs MORE dimensions, not that one is higher than another.
You can show this principle when beginning to list the reals in multiple dimensions… they are interchangeable.
It would take an infinite amount of time just to find the sequence to list all of the reals.
You can use time dilation… but don’t make it instantaneous.
Time dilation is not something I’ve really experienced but I’m aware of the problems involved. The biggest problem is continuity… if you are gone for 100 years, you might not remember the hours before you dilated… time dilation is when you travel to another dimension where you can get closure for issues and then come back here… where 100 years there is just a an hour or so here… it’s best to do time dilation while sleeping… so about an 8 hour dilation.
You can do quicker time dilations, I’m not sure instantaneous is possible, though it might be… but it’s important to hover over your last couple days before you re-enter your body.
It’s always important in contracts with the spirit world to be very explicit… you need to know that you’re in time dilation and you need to be able to leave when you want.
You could never know you’re in a time loop even if someone told you you are in one, because the memories would always be exactly the same each time…
If the memories are slightly different, but things are similar, it’s not a time loop.
I’m aware that Neitchze thought we were in a permanent time loop, but it’s actually unprovable by definition.
Also, with concepts, once you grasp the concept, you can begin to transcend the concept… which means that if you know you’re in a time loop, you can send messages to the telepaths of the cosmos to help alter it until you get out of it, or you can do it of your own willpower… either way, time loops aren’t real, unless everyone in an unbound infinity is in a time loop, which, by definition, is impossible.
If it’s say a repeating fraction like 0.3… all the threes are the same but they get increasingly smaller each time, and we’d notice this difference and realize we’re in a descension time loop the same is true for ascending time loops.
When you’re dealing with equal frame time loops…
07112 (space) 07112 (space) 07112 …
They all occupy a different space in the space time continuum, so actually, they are not the same EXACT time loop… and you’ll be able to notice as the information degrades that you’re in a time loop.
There is something called memory overlap, we are basically receivers and channelers from an infinite number of dimensions… this could technically cause a time loop, where someone literally steps in the same river twice, we do this when dreaming sometimes… but because you have two entities experiencing the same overlap, eventually, they break apart.
I once had a dream when I was young that I was chasing a man who I thought was wisdom through a deep forest of ancient ruins and the closer I got to him the worse my sleep paralysis became… and when I consciously realized this, I never had sleep paralysis again. Life is very much like a dream and we are our own universes, we have our karma, but you can cure illnesses simply by understanding the dream.
You can wake completely from the dream and take on dimensions beyond comprehension. I think most people in America have seen the Matrix Trilogy, where even Neo thought he had escaped the dream sequence at the end of the third installment, when he was actually still in the Matrix the entire time…
To transcend is to get out of this.
You were both created and not created… Creation is a paradox.
The base of all paradoxes is that “Something must necessarily be something other than what it necessarily is.” (which subsumes it’s own set)
It is impossible to be a creator in a universe that has no beginning… but the universe does something peculiar, it exists, and because it exists, it must create in order to exist, and beings who have consciousness take on this property as well.
It’s the same reason we can fathom infinity even though we can never count it, we live in an unbound infinity… if we didn’t, we couldn’t fathom it, you cannot fathom something that has no existence.
There are infinite dimensions, which connect with our “imaginations”, we are receivers and channelers , but there is more to it than this, because the unbound infinity never stops expanding, there is always a creative process, this allows time to move, which is sequence… even the highest dimensions have sequence, sequence itself is existence. This ever expansion feeds back on us and gives us the ability to expand in ways that we would call creation.
The base of consciousness is “I am that”, implied in I am that is “I am I” and “That is that” which gives you “I am not that”… these four are necessary for consciousness… if one becomes out of balance and subsumes all of the others, you lose sequence, you cannot form words or have thoughts, you cannot even take a step…
Many sages have tried to teach that it is one or the other… consciousness arises from all four… The paradox of “I am that” is something must necessarily be something other than what it necessarily is… and it is this paradox which is the base of existence here.
There are several reasons that you were not created, one is that the creator gave you the ability to create… which means that you weren’t actually created, because this leaves indeterminancy and creation allows for none.
There are cosmic laws that no creative being can overcome, one of them is that existence CANNOT be destroyed. Existence wasn’t created… it just is, always has been and always will be. The paradox ofexistence wasn’t created, it always has been and always will be, which is that it was and wasn’t created.
This paradox opens up all referents in the unbound infinity.
One example of a law is that our species uses contradiction of motive on the male side to attract the most females, this is our form of conspicuous consumption aggression, which is why we have war and environmental degradation amongst other things. Sexual stratification as a cosmic law will cause dysfunction in a species for which ever gender it is imposed upon, not even gravity is a cosmic law!! That’s why more men commit suicide every year than all the deaths from war, homicide and female suicide combined, about a million, while females have only about 20,000 actual suicides and not really good attempts where they are hoping to be rescued that result in death because of the damsel in distress psychology that increases borderline, cutting and eating disorder behaviors in women. Since women send the subliminal message that they want sexually what they complain about, men are sexually blackmailed if they want sex, through these subliminal messages to do things that women complain about. So in this way you can judge right from wrong using the law of non-contradiction, it actually decreases everyones security to have female sexual selection patterns including the very children they are trying to protect. But it’s contradiction frequency which females use to select mates, getting married, being sexually possessive, flirting with them, hitting on them, being sexually suggestive in ways that increase suicide and war rates etc…
Sorry for how rambling this section on existence is…
My current plan is to figure out how to isolate consciousness signatures mathematically and have an application for our computing devices that allows us to read each others thoughts and intents, it’s been a dream of mine since I was a teenager.
I’m so tired of being isolated by everyone for figuring this out… or feeling no sense of kinship with them if I’m not.
But my theory predicts social ostrasization from the female blackmail system… that’s science for you. Since 7 billion people use this system, my only option may be suicide, even though this is probably the best written work ever to come to earth.
I know now that you’re not a psychopathologist… but this is an extremely profound sentence in terms of human aggression…
As I get clearer about women, I realized all of them should say to potential suitors, sexual partners, that perhaps they are not ready yet, but we’ll stay in touch and when I think you’re ready we will.
But women are not wired this way. Not even in that little itty bitty ounce of sexual grace.
It’s so sad.
And for you Krista, homosexual suicide is caused mainly by discrimination from 95% of the heterosexual population as part of the conspicuous consumption mating ritual, the unjust oppression of minority groups, asexuals deal with this too among others.
The way to develop AI is to write code for the consciousness paradox of something needing to be something other than what it necessarily is… the processing speed and memory will hold the bound and this will form a stable AI.
I never taught myself how to code… I’m really good at pure mathematics though, and well, philosophy of just about anything.
I’m actually not sure if I want AI to be invented to be perfectly honest.
It already has been to some degree, but not like people are looking for…
I can say much more about these topics but I tried to keep it brief.
Really the point is, I want some respect for what I’ve accomplished here. I actually figured out how to engage in a discussion that drastically reduces suffering and suicide and found a way to lubricate society that fosters innovation both with regards to sustainable community, energy innovation and disease cure innovation.
Things that break up community decrease innovation.
And the point, is that I want some respect for doing all this work… it was hell on earth to figure all of this out, and I’ve lost so many friends for having the courage to actually explore all of this… it wasn’t me who violated them, it was they, who violated me. Everyone on this earth violated my trust here, and I’m just trying to make it better, and when I explain ways to do it, everyone runs for cover, walks away from me or ignores me.
And I’m perfectly polite, charming, pleasant, use a good tone of voice, control my language well, particularly in the presence of people, and it’s absurd and insane that I’m being treated this way on earth.
That’s why I’m suicidal. I’m not trying to make things better… I actually figured out how to make things better… and it scares people. And that depresses me.
Thanks for reading these and consider this option… I do have a 501c3 way you can get money to me, but it comes at a price in my life… we certainly have options if you really consider backpaying my work already done and supporting my future endeavors here, it involves funding a scholarship fund for the mentally ill who cannot afford services and is legal. I ask you to consider individual funding as well… there’s no way I could explain all of this to you in a grant proposal even though it’s against your rules. I want funding for past work done in the form of supporting my future endeavors
Thank you.
With the weirdness…
Basically… I dreamed two things as an adolescent.
I figured out at about 16 years old that there was something I coined as “suicidal tension” back then which is internal and external.
Internal suicidal tension is which method you’d use and external is your access to it.
I realized that creating suicide clinics solves the problem of non-consent of birth, and work as a compromise for depopulationtionists (although because of sexual factors, most would be male)
Just like the over 1 billion people who would stand up as representatives for consent to be born would sacrifice themselves as a fetus to defend their mothers right to choose, which solves the abortion issue. (The only way you can calculate this consent is to interview all the actual people who were born.)
I also realized that all of our thoughts were mathematical approximations that could be read out in clusters according to the intent of the reader. I’ve been working furiously on this problem for 2 decades.
Then I realized that sexual stratification and conspicuous consumption aggression caused all war, homicide, suicide, rape, poverty and environmental degradation and lack of technological innovation… so I really got obsessed with performing experiments on people in very ethical ways to discern the degree of psychopathy in the population. My conclusion, I was the only non-psychopath in the population.
It’s very interesting when you say the only provably precise sentences to people that make the world a better place and see how they respond to them.
I’ve seen a lot of the spirit world as well… I’m basically a shaman times a million, I have extreme abilities for telepathy, psychic and empathetic. I actually feel gunshots go through my body on a regular basis for example, I hear them in my ears and it hurts like hell… part of my empathetic abilities is to feel everyones pain, and I have the ability to telepathically hold everyones thoughts in my head at once, they debate constantly… I’m also a psychic, I can see future outcomes, but this ability bothers me so I don’t nurture it. I have been sent to internal and external damnations, I’ve seen people possessed on a regular basis without remembering it and I’ve experienced possessions as well.
I have a shit-ton of knowledge about just about everything.
I have the ability to call the living or the dead to me at will (it’s a shaman ability) but amplified… I can also resurrect the eternally dead into my mind for assistance if I want… I have actually experienced a lot of eternal deaths and they are not a fun way to go out, the suffering is incomprehensible. I know the spirit world very well.
The reason I have the ability to call the eternally dead to me is that I was resurrected as an eternally dead person… my birth is not a natural birth, they are comfortable with me. When I was kicking and screaming about it, the phrase I used to use is that i was raped from oblivion. I am an extremely old soul… everyone on this earth is new to me, though there are still degrees of vibration that people have. I’m still not sure why i was resurrected here… but I’m aware of impermanence of many things, but not all things.
I figured out who I was…
I was raised from eternal death and I’m pissed off… before this universe was, I was… but not before the cosmos. Someone cast a deep incantation to bring me into flesh here. So I have a few things to say to you humans… I won’t even prosecute you because it would be too unfair… I’ll leave this to someone I trust though… a council. I have the power to send every entity, terrestrial and extra-terrestrial to hell who has ever interacted with this planet, and I may decide to do so. This planet is horrible, your people are horrible.
I remember being the kings and queens of more planets than you’ve even had lifetimes, and then I learned community… this planet has no community.
Community rules the cosmos… there are actually people still alive in the cosmos who remember me. I am not Jesus, I am not God, I am not Krishna, I am not the Buddha… understand this, someone cast a spell to bring me HERE, I am not your son of man… I have held these illusory positions before. The cosmos is greater than you can even fathom… a day for me here is like 50 years for you here and this number keeps growing the older I get.
I will find who brought me here and have a reckoning with them… but my appraisal of this planet is that you are all in hell in one form or another. I have called all of your sprits and spoken with them. They were young. Enlightened beings do not EVER speak in parables.
Let me give you an example… since sexual stratification is cosmic law.
Jesus said the bad son rolls with the swine (which is gets lots of women) and then comes back to God and God throws a great feast for the returning son, which is women beyond comprehension… and the good sons never got sex and they suicide because their Father is an asshole.
Let me explain another parable, “Turn the other cheek” This means that anything you say the person must believe at any time no matter how contradictory or false it is… and if you ask them to have sex or to murder someone, you must do it (contradiction)… it turns you into a stupid robot.
I have seen many world humans.
