1 Like
I do understand that the Holocaust is central to this movie. Is that what you mean no one has provided any evidence for? Who is it who has only used insults and put downs? What is your position on the film or the events of the two opposed characters?
1 Like
What are you talking about?
1 Like
I’m not denying the Holocaust what I am denying is the numbers it was less than 6 million and that the gas Chambers were used I think they were worked to death and shot.
2 Likes
What does this change? Let’s say you’re right. Less Jews were killed for being Jews and they were killed a different way. Where does that leave us? And who is insulting and where? And what does the film have to do with your take?
1 Like
it didn’t happen
2 Likes
And this is exactly as far as i watched the clip.
This told me everything and anything i needed to know. No thank you. Good bye.
2 Likes
Why did you randomly put a capital D on ‘Downs’? Now every time I come on here it looks as if there’s a thread about Down’s syndrome (or is it some kind of hidden message that you have the condition?)
1 Like
What do you mean there’s ‘no evidence’? It’s probably the MOST documented event in history! The Germans couldn’t help themselves. They were fanatical record-keepers. What ‘evidence’ do you expect? ‘Selfies’ from the gas chambers? Fuck off.
Why is this in ‘slow mode’? If you are going to allow Holocaust-denial then you should at least allow uninterrupted annihilation of the shitstains. It doesn’t even allow you to edit!
1 Like
The trial of Adolf Eichmann did not uncover the existence of the Holocaust. Its basic facts had already been established through wartime documentation, the International Military Tribunal, and years of historical research. However, the trial brought together an enormous body of evidence that deepened and broadened public understanding of how the Holocaust was organized and experienced.
More than 100 Holocaust survivors testified. Their accounts described life in ghettos, mass shootings, deportations, concentration camps, and extermination camps. While many of these experiences were already known to historians, the trial gave survivors an unprecedented public platform, making individual experiences central to the historical record.
Prosecutors introduced thousands of pages of original German records, including transport schedules, official correspondence, orders, and reports. These documents demonstrated the bureaucratic machinery behind the deportation of Jews across Europe and helped establish Eichmann’s role in coordinating those deportations.
The prosecution showed how ministries, railways, police forces, and SS agencies worked together to identify, transport, and murder millions of people. The trial illustrated that genocide depended not only on direct killers but also on officials who managed logistics.
Documents and witnesses covered events in countries including Hungary, Poland, the Netherlands, France, Greece, and elsewhere, demonstrating the pan-European scope of the Holocaust.
Investigators presented recordings, written statements, and testimony that shed light on Eichmann’s knowledge of and participation in the deportation program. His courtroom defence (that he was merely following orders) was weighed against documentary evidence indicating he exercised initiative and understood the lethal consequences of the deportations.
But the trial’s impact went beyond the evidence itself. It helped shift public attention from viewing the Holocaust primarily through military or legal documents to hearing directly from survivors. It reinforced the historical record through the combination of eyewitness testimony and contemporaneous Nazi records. It educated audiences worldwide, as the proceedings were extensively covered by international media. It contributed to later Holocaust scholarship and influenced how genocide, individual responsibility, and crimes against humanity are understood.
In short, the Eichmann trial didn’t just reveal that the Holocaust had happened; rather, it went further and assembled extensive documentary and testimonial evidence that illuminated
how it was carried out,
who participated, and
what victims experienced,
making the historical record both richer and more accessible to the public.
1 Like