Identity is Grounded in Monadic Recursion Via Event of Distinction

Identity is Grounded in Monadic Recursion Via Event of Distinction

  • negation/absence

– negation of negation/absence of absence

( ) context/set/localization

↔ binconditional/if and only if

–X = (–X ↔ -X)

-X = (-X ↔ --X)

(–) = ((–) ↔ (-))

(-) = ((-) ↔ (–))

((–) = ((–) ↔ (-))) ↔ ((-) = ((-) ↔ (–)))

–(=) ↔ -(=)

(=) ↔ (-, --)

(<->) = (-, --)

(–) ↔ (-)

— = -

---- = –

----- = -

------ = –

-(-…) = (- → -)

X = -

X(X) = –

All standard identity laws, and formal rules, as subject to identity are subject to these distinctions given they are events of distinction themselves.

Feels very familiar. But I don’t yet quite know how to express it other then like a pre-formed switching pattern reflecting it’s self into the very modulating ground which it can no longer recognize.