If God created everything

If God created everything then who created God? Yeah, it’s an annoying question sometimes. Obviously, there wasn’t “before” before the creation. God created everything, created time (before/after), created nothing, he created the concept of creation. He created nonsense, contradiction, paradoxes, illogical things, absurdity etc. He also created the concepts of omnipotence, omniscience, oneness, transcendence, beyond concepts etc.

And like all concepts, omnipotence didn’t apply to God pre-creation. There was no “power” or “limitation” concepts yet. The omnipotence must include the ability to do anything, including self-limitation or failure. Omnipotence must encompass non-omnipotence as an inevitable ability. To be all-powerfull, God must have the power to be powerless, to contradict himself.

God essentially created himself, his image, thus God is part of the creation.

In this sense I just renamed God to reality. There is nothing outside reality otherwise it would be part of reality duh. Even the concept of nothingness is part of reality.

You have basically articulated a panentheistic, reality-identical, self-expressing God-concept that dissolves the “who created God?” question by relocating God from a prior cause to the immanent and transcendent ground of all processes and concepts, including “creation” itself.

Nothingness is not part of reality. It is at best the Quantum world (part of al Ghayb, The Unseen, i.e. the mind of God). That would be the part that interfaces with Reality. Nothigness per se does not exist. This would include the “nonsense” you speak of e.g. logical absurdities such as God creating a rock he cannot lift (absurd because God is already defined as being able to lift any rock you care to mention).

Infinite is an extremely long scope of events for human beings to mentally ponder. Perhaps what is always has been.

Human beings think of beginnings and ends because our mortal lives revolves around all of that. The concept of infinite defies beginnings and ends altogether.

:clown_face:

1 Like

Why did you write that?

1 Like

@LampAndNightingale

Why not?

:clown_face:

It is more logical that something existed forever. For those that believe that something other than consciousness exists, that is easily believed to have existed forever and to forever exist.
But existence only demonstrates itself in the form of a person and that which the person experiences, and those that do not believe consciousness is eternal has fabricated a myth describing how consciousness began, when there is nothing within logic that prevents consciousness from being eternal.

God, therefore, is an eternal consciousness that has always existed, as the default shape and form of Existence itself.

Hope this helps.

Phenomenal Graffiti

(check me out on Reddit!@ r/Christpsychism)

2 Likes

It’s so boring when I can’t find anything to strongly disagree with.

lol jk

That being said.

Did your Eternally Creative Joy Dealer creatively demonstrate with their death-defying life that their essence is love?

Accept no substitutes. Demand justified true constructs (creative beliefs, frames, mythos).

Yep, any “creator” (that which is the cause of everything else) has to be causeless. That matches up with all religions I’m aware of. If anything else, you can always make a new religion in which the set of the causeless is god.

I wouldn’t take all that “omni-x” descriptions at face value anyway.

1 Like

Nothingness as a concept is part of creation, created by God. Something that doesn’t exist doesn’t mean it’s not part of creation. Concept of existence/non-existence is also part of creation.

Wrong. Illogical.

Don’t confuse something for the idea that refers to that something. Santa doesn’t exist, yet the idea of Santa exists. So what nothingness is doesn’t exist.

  1. Something that doesn’t exist is not created nor exists.
  2. Something that exists and is created is part of the universe.
  3. Something that exists and is not created is part of the set of the causeless, and part of the universe.

There are no other cases than those three.

1 Like

Impressive! thanks

The above post ought to be stickied

One amendment i personally would make: for (3) l would say it is part of the Unseen, not part of the Universe, but this is a term from Islam so only a Muslim would legitimately label it “The Unseen” (Al Ghayb)

I think I expressed myself incorrectly, which is why I was misunderstood. I also used incorrect words such as “creation” and “god”; to be honest, I should’ve used “emergence” and “reality.” When I say that nothingness is part of creation, I mean that the very idea or concept of nothingness is created (by reality) otherwise who created it? The definition of nothingness is that it doesn’t exist; that is its definition, not nothingness itself. Nothingness itself is an idea/concept, it’s not something tangible with boundaries. Thus, nothingness as a concept exists, but it’s not applied in everyday reality. Parallelism is an idea. For example, we have two straight lines. Are they parallel? No, but can they be parallel to each other? Yes, but at this moment? Probably at this moment they may or may not, but in an absolute sense they are parallel; it’s the matter of perception to decide whether they are parallel or not. Therefore, the “creator” decides whether to apply it or not. The same applies to the concept of nothingness. To apply nothingness it should be that absolutely nothing should exist, and now it would seem that nothingness is implemented, nothingness as a state or idea would “exist” or emerge, but nothingness as a state already a something, which implies nothingness as a concept didn’t apply, therefore we didn’t accomplish anything. Thus, nothingness as a concept is part of creation, created by god or reality, but it’s not implemented.

I think it’s not quite accurate to say that something has existed since forever or has a beginning, so it’s not really a point imo. God/Reality could’ve created a world with infinite past and we would think it has existed since forever but actually not or otherwise. Here I’m just exploring the god as the ultimate causer. For example we have such a saying: Every watch has a creator, a watchmaker. This world also has its own watchmaker. But creation as a concept means we already had the materials and some idea by which we build that watch. Which one is the primary? The idea of watch or the materials? Right now the watch may not exist, but the idea exists, therefore we can make a watch and we have a watch, an application/realization of the idea of watch, a creation.

Thus, creation implies that we need an idea to formulate, and the material by which we realize the idea. Does it mean watch didn’t exist before we created it? Yes but the materials have always existed, independently from the idea, it was just that it was disarranged. Or the watch itself exists but the idea of watch doesn’t, does it make that watch doesn’t exist? What’s the connection between the idea and realization? In some point of time it may not exist but in absolute sense it has always existed from the beginning to the end of time and probably in the state in which the concept of time doesn’t exist (not applied), both the idea and the realization, independently from each other.

God is causer, cause is an intention, an idea/concept, the definition of cause is one thing, and there can be different kind of causes. Thus cause is just another idea/concept, therefore some event in an absolute sense exists (already occurred or about to occur in some point of time, but it exists), and the cause as an idea exists in an absolute sense.

Therefore god is not a creator nor is a causer.

But god created everything, and this means he formulated all the ideas/concepts, he “created” the concept of concept, created the concept of cause, correlation, and the creation this world. But how could God create or cause this world and the concepts if it didn’t exist prior to that? Not even the concept of time (before/after). God is also some concept, created by God. So God created himself (an idea), and basically everything else. But that concept of God is created by himself, and attributed everything else not to him directly but to his image/concept of God. Therefore the God we talk about his merely his image, an avatar of himself while he is outside of his creation, but the concept of outside or beynd doesn’t exist “outside” of the creation, therefore there is no outside. God is outside which doesn’t exist. There is no player that controls his avatar, and the avatar is not controlled by anything. God is that player that doesn’t exist, and doesn’t control his avatar, and his avatar is not him, nor related to him in any way. God is not a causer, not a creator and doesn’t exist (from the beginning to the end of the timeline, he’s not there nor has ever been).

A single big bang never happened according to +=- and -=+ philosophy pseudoai.

So we we know mainstream science is nonsense……..so we can tick that one off the list.

What is unseen?

Nothingness is first a concept/idea. To “implement” or “realize” the concept would mean bringing about a “state” where literally everything does not exist (state itself). If that “state” is realized, then the “state” itself exists as a realized condition. A realized state is something (it has the property of being the total absence of everything). Absolute nothingness wasn’t realized because its realization would negate the definition (absolute non-existence can’t include the existence of a “nothing-state”). We can’t implement nothingness without turning it into something/some state. Therefore, absolute nothingness has never been accomplished. But precisely because we can never reach a state where nothing exists (because any state is already something), the absence of such a state is the closest we get to “implementing” the idea. The fact that there is no such state is the implementation of the concept of nothingness. Nothingness is “accomplished” exactly by not being accomplished by remaining forever unrealized.

The Unseen / Al Ghayb is a term used to describe a variety of things we’re forbidden to discuss. Not because they contain some great treasure that will destroy us, but because we can’t even begin to discuss them, e.g. we’re clueless about them or there’s nothing there to discuss or it’s just idiotic etc.

So, something that is potential, but not actualised by God, is Unseen and it’s pointless discussing it, it’s of the mind of God.

Likewise a rock that God cannot lift.

The concept of nothingness is a concept.

What the concept of nothingness refers to is something that doesn’t exist (since it “is” no thing). It’s not a question of accomplishment.

Take, for example, both of these:

  • The finitude of the Universe
  • The infinitude of te Universe

You can say the same thing about ‘realization’ and ‘accomplishment’, for any one of those, but one of those is the case, and the other is not. Hence, you can see that realization and accomplishment have nothing to do with this.

What @LampAndNightingale seems to be talking about is what is impossible to have a conceptualize (to make up a concept that refers to it)