Imperialism

Imperialism I

I believe that one man should rule the entire world.

Imperialism is a mixture of political Absolutism and Fascism. A large civilization, or all civilizations on Earth, becomes ruled by an Emperor. An emperor is the epitome of human existence. He is the “best possible man”. He is a Nietzschean Ubermenschen. He is super-human, post-human, above-human. He is a relative impossibility. Because the average man, the merely-human, the human-all-too-human, neither hopes to, nor can, entertain the hope to achieve such a level of heightened existence. I use the term Heightened, similar to Illuminated, Enlightened, Wise. These are conceptions of wisdom. An emperor must become all-wise with the most powerful types of knowledge.

The first and foremost powerful type of knowledge is humanity. An emperor must know all of humanity. Because one cannot rule what one is underneath. And one cannot rule what one does not know, as he knows himself. Therefore an emperor must understand the core and soul of other humans. Furthermore he must exert some type of control, force, or influence, which ultimately must extend to all corners of civilization or a single empire. In other words, an emperor must influence all. He touches all. He affects all, directly or indirectly.

Perhaps the most obvious aspect of an emperor, and therefore imperialism, is Nietzsche’s WTP. Without the Willing To Power, there is no possibility for politics, let alone an absolutist demonstration of any political ideology. Therefore an emperor must accept WTP fully and spiritually. Life is only the Willing Toward Power. And an emperor is such a man who achieves power exponentially, and rises in this power with no known end.

The WTP necessitates competition, often a deadly competition. Boys grow into teenagers, and then into men. But the world of men is evil. It is full of hatred, violence, crime, rape, murder, death. A man’s world is full of fear, war, and gore. Young men who aspire to ascend to greater heights of power must confront all of these concepts, within themselves, and against others. Many men avoid manhood. They opt for a Judæo-Christian, Eternal Childhood instead. They choose Infancy. They choose to remain and be a manchild, instead of becoming man. This is the seed of Nietzsche’s philosophy, the essence of his entire philosophy and ideology.

There is no such thing as “Being Man”. There is only Becoming Man. There is never a frozen “man” such that one has reached the Height of existence. Instead, man itself, as a concept, as an organism, as a philosophy, is a constant Striving. Man is a constant Struggle, a constant Agony. Man is in a constant state of War. This is marked by adulthood, the transformation (Metamorphization) of youth into adulthood, and boy-child into uber-man.

However the struggle and strife for Power, is only the beginning for a boy or man. It only opens the door to all of the highest possibilities. What can a man make out of his finite and limited lifetime? Which memories can he strive for, or ought he strive for? What is a man’s Eternal Recurrence? Where are his memories which he will take with him into the void, and into death when he finally meets Death for the final time? What experience is one that forces a man “to live”, for once in his entire lifetime? In this question, the question is finally asked and answered in the same instance. What is the meaning of a man’s life, becomes answerable by the (transcendental) moment in his life whenever he felt “most alive”.

In this most alive moment, a man can finally wake up from his childhood, from his adolescence, and from his boyishness.

This is the step into the “real” world, a world at war, where men will fight, live, and die with each other, and against each other.

This is a world at war, for power and only power. All those who deny power, are those without power, or those seeking to deny power from other men.

Imperialism II

Bellum omnium contra omnes

An Emperor first recognizes that life is an eternal struggle, conflict, and war. In the Willing Toward Power (WTP), known as life, all men and women are direct competitors and enemies. There is no such thing as an “ally” or “friend”. There is no “companionship”. Thus, all (aristocrats, ubermenschen) who take the risk and strive for the highest social position (Emperor) of any and all civilization, must accept and understand these premises to their fullest, complete logical ends. There are methods to attain higher power. These methods are known as Virtues.

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=181997

Egalitarianism is a lie. And it is a lie directly attacking WTP and Virtue. Egalitarianism pretends that “all men are (born) equal”. But the WTP immediately proves this false. There are alternative forms of and routes to Power. A man may focus on his intellectual strength, or his physical/bodily strength, or his agility. He may focus on his social standing and popularity, his likability to others. He may focus on his beauty and cosmetics. He may focus on his jobs and money, his bank account, wealth. Each man chooses to enhance his greatest virtue or compensate for his weakest virtue. One man could become physically strong and intimidating, large, bulky, muscled, and corded, but intellectually stupid, poor, and ugly. However, his physical strength may grant him higher accesses to power, and therefore Virtue.

Theoretically an emperor, a ‘Highest’ Man of All, will excel in all virtues. He will excel intellectually, wisely, physically, dexterously, popularly, beautifully, wealthy. In all human conceptions of power, a true spiritual leader, and therefore a cultural leader, will become obvious. One man is above all other men. Therefore, egalitarianism becomes more obvious of a lie. The lower men, the mere-men and the untermenschen, the scum and degenerates of the Earth, will create an “Anti-Imperial” religion. This is Judæo-Christianity, a reaction and hatred against the first Roman Emperors. The Judæo-Christian faith existed to placate the average man, the average moron, the average manimal.

Rather than themselves fight for power, struggle, take risks, and confront fear and death…the average manimal cowers and bitches, whines and begs.

The average man is a miser. Therefore, nihilistic religions become necessitated as a logical conclusion. The average man can never even begin to hope to ascend to such heights of power, as previously pressed against them, and set by the greatest men of all ages: heroes, legends, gods. This was the original conception of any ‘god’ figure. Paganism was first seeded within the status and possibility of the first Roman Emperors: a Cæsar. A King of Kings. A Best of the Best. An above-human of the super-human. This obviously invites Strife, War, Conflict, Hate, Evil, Death. Men will strive for power. Men will kill for power. Men will break all the rules, laws, and earthly boundaries for power. Men will organize for power. Men will take power.

Might makes Right.

The Egalitarian, Humanist, Nihilistic religions were a first reaction against this fascistic totalitarianism. And even today, the word “totalitarian” carries an unpopular, negative connotation. This is a “bad” word. It is evil. It is wrong. It is wrong to want power. It is wrong to take power. This is educated to all the plebs of Western society, all the children of the public schools and churches. All minds, practically from birth, are instructed that the wanting of power is Evil. And this is what Judæo-Christians call Evil. Ironically, or perhaps not a coincidence at all, Christians then invert the inversion, and claim that “Man is born Good” and “born without Sin” or “born innocent”.

This is a ruse, a lie, a trick. It is a trick used to pervert and corrupt the slave and plebian population. It is a trick used to fool and confuse the paupers, the poor, and even the middle class and commoners. It is used against the lowest (cultural) class, as a veil. This distinction, this “Noble Lie” then divides the Noble (Aristocracy) from the Common (Egalitarians). Egalitarianism is a common ideology, for common, stupid, stunted minds. Even while the poor and the middle class sacrifice the most, and struggle the most, and compete the most, and suffer the most of all…they are too stupid to realize this competition directly proves their Nihilism false. While the poor compete among the poor, and gain little, and often die in vain fighting wars dumped onto their shoulders by the Elites, they actually buy into the bullshit, that competition is “wrong”, “bad”, “evil”.

Therefore the plebs fear Evil. This turns into self-hatred, Nihilism. This creates the average “Jew” and “Christian” in Western society.

Where does this ‘should’ come from?
Aren’t you simply describing your desire?

My political beliefs: pro-conservatism, pro-authoritarianism, pro-fascism, pro-totalitarianism, pro-imperialism.

On the contrary, I am describing every living organism’s desire.

Imperialism III

Matthew 10:34, “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

This is one of the most important biblical phrases. Judæo-Christianity is a direct reaction to Paganism, to Roman Imperialism, to the Cæsars, to Polytheistic Deism. As such, the Christian phrase makes immediate sense. Jesus Christ, the Judæo-Christian (per)version of the Græco-Roman, Yulius Kaiser. You can see it here. Even the core element of Christianity, directly admits to: Bellum omnium contra omnes. Jesus Christ brings a ‘sword’ to Christians and Jews. What is this sword? It is the very premise of an Absolutist War, the Greek Concept: Agon (ἀγών) or “Agony”, “Agonizing”.

Some words have a long history, “Agony” represents such a history. The common class, the plebs, are taught words by their parents and teachers. But, they really do not “dig deeper” with any philosophical inclination or curiosity. And even if they have such curiosity, they immediately become lost and confused due to their lack of (genetic) intelligence. The pleb is genetically average, genetically common, genetically stunted. This prevents the average man, the common mind, from accessing such conceptions of words. A word has a history. And so, when a commoner speaks of “Agony”, he also presumes (without his knowing) such a primal concept as Bellum omnium contra omnes.

A brief understanding of Aristocracy:

The word of “Cæsar”, “Kaiser”, “Czar”, “Tsar”, means “Emperor”. However, the first conception of this term actually represents the core of imperialism. And people do not suspect this connection. This connection is Family. Furthermore, it is Patriarchy. The word “Cæsar” is a family name, the name of a genetic lineage. Therefore, an “Emperor” represents a genetic lineage by a conceptual name. A family is given a name. Or, a family makes its own name. And this conception of family-“building”, is the first form of Imperialism. An Imperialist, therefore, is a family-man.

A brief understanding of Christ as the reaction to Cæsar:

The Jews, in rebellion against the Roman Emperors (Cæsars), developed an “Anti-Imperialist” ideology. This is why Christ does not come to bring “peace” to Earth, but a “Sword” (to the Roman Empire and its Emperors). Jews are king-killers, and emperor-haters. Because the first Emperor (Cæsar) had conquered Israel long ago. Judaism, and Christianity, are both born out of Revenge against Imperialism. Specifically, these Pop Religions are born out of contempt and resentment. This resentment is ultimately seeded in the premise of Bellum omnium contra omnes.

Conclusion to Part III:

As you can see, now, necessarily and immediately, the Emperor is Pro-Family. The Judæo-Christian is Anti-Family. While the Cæsar represents an acquisition of power through family, through a bloodline, through a genetic lineage, through blood…the Nihilist religion of Judæo-Christian inverts this. Christ brings a sword to “divide brother against brother, father against son, son against father, etc.” Christ uses the ‘Meme’ to override and trump the Gene. Meme > Gene. Instead of: Gene > Meme. The Jew and Christian teaches (but may not believe in, necessarily) the Roman pleb, the commoner, the average man, the merely-man, Anti-Familial values. This is fully represented by the “Kingdom of God”, in which, God’s Laws trump the (paganistic) laws of individual families.

Whereas the father-figure in the early Roman Empire, the father himself was ‘god’, the Christian religion spread like the cancer that it is, and replaced the pagan father-figure (merely-man) with “God” as an abstraction. Thus, Judæo-Christianity takes the patriarchal status out of the common man, disrupting it, and then replaces it with its own conception (of masculine/male authority). This is how Jews and Christians find their ‘Revenge’ against Greeks and Romans. This is how they found their revenge, I should say. Because this is “human” history. This is the very basis for all of Western society and civilization.

It is amusing watching someone who struggles so hard to achieve mediocrity advocating a strict ranking system that would likely see him killed almost instantly.

Don’t you have some chemtrail and bigfoot videos to watch?

Imperialism IIII

So it is now clear. The Græco-Roman ideal of ‘Love’ is diametrically opposed to the Judæo-Christian ideal of ‘Love’. The difference appears from the (e)valuation of gene and meme. There is the pro-family Conservatism of Græco-Roman paganism. There is the anti-family Liberalism of Judæo-Christian monotheism. What one person calls “love” throughout the world today is dualistic. People mean radically different messages by the conception and usage of “love”. For the Pagan, love is confined to blood and family. Strangers are (largely) unworthy of love. A pagan does not “love thy neighbor” as Christians instruct. For Jews and Christians, love is “Universal”. In Christianity, your love is owed to another. In paganism, another’s love is owed to you. This creates a divergent philosophical, cultural, religious, and spiritual ideology around Selfishness and Selflessness. Thus, pagans and christians define “love” and “power” in radically different premises and metaphysics.

It is powerful to take from other people, or, it is powerful to give to other people.

By the ‘Agon’ of life, the war of all against all, who can any individual trust? What does trust mean, between the pagan and christian? Is it not different? It is different. Because, a man with allies and friends gains an advantage over men without numbers (Popularity) backing them. Men find power through popularity. And popularity is quantitative, not qualitative. Popularity, and Democracy, pop culture and pop religion, focus on acquiring the highest quantities of people, and effectively ignore attracting and incorporating the highest quality of men and women. This is why the highest quality men and women can and do effectively ignore Judæo-Christianity. It is a slavish institution designed to hinder the common man in his lifelong quest for power. Judaism and Christianity to not “help” the commoner and the pleb, at least not beyond a certain degree.

Large cultish institutions reserve the highest levels of power, knowledge, and wisdom for their leaders. There is hierarchy of which the commoner is excluded. For example, Protestantism was radical and treasonous to Christianity, because it removed the Bishop and Priest as middlemen, blocking the peasant from access to God directly. After enough time, Northern Europeans eventually collapsed the Christian religion with this postulation, embodied by Nietzsche. Because, once the middleman is removed from the equation, what is to prevent the pleb and the common man, from once again believing whatever superstition he enjoys, about himself and God, and himself with respect to God? There is no prevention. Because then, there is no separation between God and the peasant. Protestantism makes Christianity unnecessary, and then, makes God unnecessary. This is what N called the “Death of God”.

Now is another pivotal moment in world history. With God dead, and Judæo-Christianity in a weakened state, the pagans of the world can come out of hiding again, after 2000 years of hiding. And what had once been called evil (Pride), is no longer something distasteful or unwanted. It is no longer ‘negative’. And where do people find pride in their lives, except, from their families? Where do people find pride, except from their own accomplishments, from their ethnicity and from their race? Does the average commoner and peasant, today, find pride in his cult, his religion, his spirituality? No, he finds pride in Pop Culture and Pop Religion. The average moron, today, finds pride in…voting, for a moron, from a moron. The average pleb finds meaning in life by voting for George H.W. Bush, or Barack Hussein Obama. The average pleb today is more Imperial than he realizes.

Because Christianity is out of the equation. The typical protestant, christian, or jew in the US, no longer feels proud about his (scientifically invalid) God-beliefs. We exist in an age of Scientology. Science trumps religion. Philosophy is gaining strength exponentially. Science is on top. Religion is on bottom. God is dead. Therefore, the average pleb, and the average post-christian, must find their pride, and trust, in alternative sources. The average pleb places his trust into “the system”, “society”, “the matrix”. And we roll closer toward totalitarianism everyday. There is no serious distrust against “the government” or “the state”.

We see this in the brainless “Conspiracy Theorists”, who believe in bigfoot, crop circles, chemtrails, and false flags.

We see grown man-children, who trust nothing, and do not even trust what is in front of their own faces. These are the new Solipsists and Cynics.

Okay… fine. I completely support you in your every effort, and wish to see you succeed.

How do you transform this vision- a vision of one lone man from behind the screen, into a reality?

No Christian here is going to stop you. No one supporting republicanism or democracy. We promise not to get in your way. Just explain to us how you expect this to be coordinated into a active reality, and also explain to us on a level we can comprehend all that stuff you were just saying, as the average person not acquainted with that stuff you just posted won’t grasp what is being said. In simple words, simple enough for dumb Christians like myself who spend all our times in crematoriums lying on bodies, saying words like ‘bar bar bar’ because we’re stupid, backwards nihilist can understand. If we understand, we might be more sympathetic to your vision if we understood it.

Please preach it to me in a clearer, more defined vision, that pragmatically elucidates the steps from mere preaching of it to making it a reality, taking the variables and frictions of contact with reality into account.

Have you seen the movie ‘Kin Dza Dza’ ?

Honestly, fuck- why not, we’re all on board with you- I’ll get all the christians behind you… just explain the how- don’t focus about the Why- you one us over, just focus on the How now. Are you going to use the tripods from War of the Worlds?

First I will talk about “family-building” as a cultural and imperial practice of Aristocracy and noblemen.

Second I will talk about the Ubermenschen, and any possible ‘highest’ type of man.

Third we will discuss Virtues and Power, and how people come to value certain aspects of life: Evaluation.

Possibly.

The first thing a man must do to acquire vast amounts of power is influence others. As you are claiming, that I have “won you over”, this could be a lie. I may have little or no actual influence against you. This will also become a part of the process of demonstrating the ‘how’ of Imperialism. Influence is not enough, alone, for a man to rise to power. He must also manipulate the Hopes (dreams) and Fears (anxiety) of entire populations. This requires deep insights into human nature, and using such insights against the wills of other men.

Naw, fuck… like, Cezar, Pezer, and Sauwelios broke me in, I’ve come to the light. I’m worshiping the Generic Pagan Parthenon now, and am planting my spirit tree tomorrow in the backyard, already got my rock circle in place; Paganism + Heidegger + Atthet = the correct formula. You’re the feather that broke the camel’s back. Why the fuck bother resisting. You did it, and I promise you, we’ll get the rest of the misinformed Christians in line. Your not giving yourself enough credit as a philosopher here. If influence is measured by the drop, then your a tsunami of understanding. I’m completely backing you here.

Okay… so… your saying you will, so what?

I don’t know… look at Obama, he gained power from influence and manipulation alone- he’s never shown evidence of actually possessing the competency to lead, or even understanding what he is saying. He says ‘Hope’ alot and exploits the fears of several diverse parts of the population. Can that be ‘power’? The ability to control national attention and sink a first rate superpower into a shithole of self inflicted despair?

Secondly, I note your using a ideal future emperor, who I suppose your see as the overman you seek, knowing power subjectively, as if it is a state of becoming demarcated informationally by the cultural standards that created his position in the first place. He requires insight into human nature, but wouldn’t a superman not require such a insight, as it’s part of his unconscious nature? For example, I don’t need deep insight into the color blue to understand something is blue and to use blueness to my advantage, but someone colorblind to blueness would need to analytically know to spot it from cues. If he is the One Eyed Man in the Land of the Blind, he would by his very nature attain a natural, consistent advantage over others, and wouldn’t need to learn, learn, learn. He just would be.

Your emplacing a subjective learning paradox on a being who shouldn’t have to learn. Your committing Les Majesty against the holiness of our future emperor, lessening his superiority.

How do you intend to resolve this? I’m all on board, but not ignorant of the subject matter. I’m willing to bow down to you, oh mighty one. Explain this Golden Path in better detail.


Atthet everything you say is like what these kids I knew when I was 14 used to say when they listened to heavy metal and took pills and hated life. It’s like you’re that group of kids who used to have these rants when I was a kid. Except you’re an adult now. Imperialism? Do you really think there’s anything interesting to say about that to anyone other than the most uninformed people? What are you doing man??

You’re backing me…until I put you to the test. Will you clap four times, and then pat your head and rub your belly at the same time, for me? Let’s see how far my influence truly extends over you.

This is just an easy task, imagine if you were required to take true risks with your Belief System, with your Metaphysics. Imagine if you are ready to put your life on the line, to prove something. And what in life is worth risking your life for? Do you even know, Onasander?

So become patient, I want to fully extrapolate the ideals into this thread.

Power is not a False Dichotomy logical fallacy. It’s not an either-or situation.

Yes it’s true that an emperor is born noble.

AND

Yes it’s true that an emperor becomes noble.

It is both. Both statements are true, a combination of Being and Becoming. You must claim the blood-rite. And then, you must also take risks. You must put your Beliefs on the line. You must exercise your Strengths. If you are beautiful, then you must exercise this power. If you are strong or smart, then you must exercise these powers.

The exercising of power is the ‘How’.

Cool bro! You sound like really mature kids at 14. That is really smart for that age.

What I’m doing is inquiring Imperialism, and its sources, and its history.

You’re inquiring it?

It’s source is in human nature. It’s history is everywhere. I don’t think we were smarter than average 14 year olds.

It seems like we agree that this is universal human (and biological?) nature. However, we can still talk about it and extrapolate the subject, which is what I’m doing here.

Sure man. So when you’re a kid you wanna play that game king of the hill where you keep shoving kids from the top but you know if they all team up against you that they’ll throw you off so you gotta be careful about how you leverage who. In the end, everyone who gets to the top gets knocked off eventually and then someone takes his place. If I ruled the playground I’d flatten the whole hill for that game because it accomplishes nothing except a bunch of kids getting hurt and getting mad at each other.

Imperialism V

An Ubermenschen sees beyond now and beyond today.

A superior man and individual has a superior mind, consciousness, and vision. He sees beyond right now, in this moment. He sees yesterday as today. And he sees tomorrow as today. He can see one year ago, backward into the past or forward into the future. A man knows that universal and natural laws do not change at random. The Law of Gravity does not just change willy-nilly. Therefore, physical and mechanical Objective Laws apply to life in the same way as they do to non-life. A man is no less subject to gravity as a rock rolls down a hill. And this is no more or less true today as it was one trillion years ago, in the past or in the future. The Law of Gravity is universal, for all time, for all space. And such perceptions of natural phenomenon require a vastly superior and intellectual mind to conceptualize these phenomena into noumena. Thus, they become Laws known to mankind.

A cultural leader, a powerful man vying for higher position in society, and life in general, will therefore apply such Universal Laws to himself and to his conception of power. Gravity and power exist within the same function and realm. What made a man powerful one thousand years ago, is no more or less true today. The Willing Toward Power is then, also, a Universal Law applicable to all lifeforms. It is within the nature of every organism, no matter how big or small, to accumulate power, by hoarding resources. Thus, gravity is directly applicable as an analogy to WTP. A powerful man has a gravitational force. And this gravity affects natural resources. A man attracts natural resources to him. This is accomplished through Tributes, Tithing, and Donations. Other (lesser) men and women willingly pay (tribute) to any highest type of man.

A tribute is given to demonstrate loyalty. And a tribute is given out of fear, to avoid retribution.

The more powerful a man becomes within any society, the larger donations (natural resources) are offered to him as a Sacrifice. Again, by the conception of Sacrifice, we must once again regress into the history of Imperialism, to the Roman Emperor Cæsar, and to Judæo-Christianity. What is the lesson of Christianity? What is the affect of Judaism and the Christ-figure? Consider the Polytheistic, Roman and Pagan notions of blood-sacrifice. It was Christianity that ended this practice. It was Christianity that demanded “no more blood sacrifice”. Now, you can connect the two. Before, all blood-sacrifice (tithing) was given to a man, an Emperor of Rome. But after Christ, the blood-sacrifices were stopped. Because “God” and “Christ” finalized the practice of sacrifice. The Jewish and Christian, Monotheistic religion laid a claim against the Roman Emperors. This was an ideological and cultural war, between pagans and the first christians.

The Christians eventually “won” this spiritual battle, by claiming that “God had sacrificed his first and finest Son (Christ) for all of humanity”. But is this claim actually true? Was this sacrifice actually made? Did Christ exist? The only way that Christianity can remain relevant today, in Postmodernity, is by assuming that such men did exist, and such a sacrifice did take place in some form. Otherwise, the “reality” becomes obvious. There was no sacrifice. Therefore, the Jews and Christians of the early Roman Empire and its history, were nothing more than anarchists and degenerates, wanting revenge against the Roman aristocracy.

What they in fact did, and accomplished their revenge, was interrupt the tithing and tribute process owed to the Roman Aristocracy.

The commoner, and the middle class “average man”, were implored by early Christians “not to sacrifice” to the Emperor Cæsar, and not to tithe to anyone else (except God). What the Christian religion was used for, as its first purpose of existence, at the core of its history, was to remove tributes paid to the Emperor and Aristocracy. Christianity was an economic force, and a political force, in the same blow. And it was anti-imperial.

However, sacrifice and blood-sacrifice did not end completely. Jews and Christians still believe in forms of (human) sacrifice. However, instead of these sacrifices going toward Polytheistic gods, or paganistic traditions, or toward the Emperor of Rome as a tribute, the sacrifices were instead Usurped by a Monotheistic ideology. In this, accomplishing this, the gold coins were eventually shifted out of the pockets of the Roman Emperors and Senators, and into the hands of the Roman Catholic Church. Christianity, in the brunt of its existence, historically, represents an economic shift in world history. Instead of the plebeian owing his coins and pocket change to Cæsar, a Man (Ubermenschen, Emperor as the highest state achievable by any individual man), the Christian clergy and their enforcers became middle-men and loansharks. The plebeian now owed his wealth (tithing) to God, a magical man, a mystical existence, a monotheism.

This is how the Roman Emperors, and the Roman Empire, was truly drained of its wealth, power, influence, and glory, over centuries of time. And it began with a Jewish and Christian economic subversion. Therefore, over time, all wealth was transferred out of the hands of the Emperor, and into the hands of the Catholic Church, and to the Papacy. This effectively made Man bow to the Christian God, instead of the Christians and God bowing to Man. This is how the Jews first found their ‘revenge’ against the Cæsars who pillaged and raped their land, Israel, so long ago.

The conclusion we can take away from this piece, is the powerful and gravitational affect of an actual, realized Emperor. If any Ubermenschen were to exist, then people would become compelled to donate to Him. He would become such a man as to have very few real enemies. Because so many men would walk far underneath Him. He walks over the shoulders of the average man and the pleb. He steps on top of them all. And most gladly hoist the Uber-man up. Because the common man, the merely-man knows instinctively, that his life will never amount to anything. The merely-man, the “human” life, has relatively low or no purpose, or meaning. And you can see this obviously today. The Nihilists and the Nietzscheans freely admit it: their lives have no purpose! These are merely-men or lowly-men, Untermenschen. In having no purpose, they exist to raise another man to higher heights.

They acquire their purpose in life, as women do. Women find their purpose in life through men. A woman and a lesser man, an untermenschen, have little to no actual purpose in life.

Imperialism VI

Liberal Egalitarianism is Anti-Family.

A father and mother receive great news! They’re having a baby, congratulations! Oh, wait, we live in a Liberal Egalitarian Social Democracy. It turns out, according to the Jews and Christians running Western Civilization, that your baby is “equal” in value to all other babies, congratulations! That means, that your own biology, your own genes, your own flesh & blood, is no “different” than anyone else. If you have a white baby, then it is “equal” with a black baby. If you have a black baby, then it is “equal” with a white baby. This is great, isn’t it? Aren’t you pro-human equality, pro-humanity? Doesn’t there only exist one race, the human race?

/sarcasm

Liberal Egalitarianism has reached the apex of its power and social influence. It has become so ridiculous that not even the most retarded human being, the most retarded manimal, can barely bite into this crap, buy into this ponsy scheme, or keep a straight face while espousing and perpetuating the lie. It is common sense that when a couple have a baby, all youthful and childish idealisms of human equality get thrown straight out the window. Here are some obvious, common sense proofs. If in actuality humanity were “equal”, then why wait until birthing your own child, before you pay for children? You can adopt a child, pay for somebody else’s child in life, and this is “equal” to having your own child. Because biology means nothing. Because evolutionary theory is a lie. Because the “Selfish Gene” is a science fiction. We’re all one race. We’re all equal.

Almost nobody actually believes these lies, above a distinct intellectual level. The manimal, the commoner, the merely-human, the pleb, the serf, they all do believe in these lies on some level. At least, they believe in these lies enough to repeat them, while acting in a contradictory fashion. But above a certain level of intelligence, and especially of the Aristocratic class, these lies are all thrown out the window. The elites do not believe these lies. And therefore, the elites take an elitist approach regarding family and family-values. Elitism, therefore, is anti-Egalitarian and pro-Family. Elitism is anti-Liberal and pro-Conservative. These values represent “family-building” in the same way that a nobleman can engage “society-building” or “civilization-building” or “empire-building”. An Ubermenschen has a choice to make: to build His own society, or, to destroy other’s societies. An Ubermenschen is equally Creative as He is Destructive.

The Creative aspect of nobility, aristocracy, and ubermenschen, is family-building. What can a man build in life, except, his own family? A man without a family is a weaker man. He is a bastard. He is morally, ethically, and spiritually void. A man cannot rise to power alone, as he can and does through a family and genetic lineage. Like begets like. A family man begets a family man. A bastard begets a bastard. And the difference is all too obvious between these familial compulsions.

The Liberal Egalitarians are liars. They either actually believe in the lies, while contradicting themselves in actions, or, they know that they are lying, but need to spread lies to keep up appearances in society and civilization. We are forced to lie, to each other, regarding “equality”. This method of lies, is known as the “house of cards” in human civilization. Civilization and Western society is built on this “house of cards”, that, people actually value strangers, when we actually do not. We all say that we “value” other people, but this is rarely true. In an individualistic society especially, the lie becomes a torment. Individuals do not value society and the families which comprise and embody civilization. An individual is never “equal” with another individual. This is the premise of individualism. Therefore Egalitarianism cannot take hold within an individualistic society, without introducing Socialism.

Socialism is rising in the United States, mostly caused by Christians and Jews, who promote their Monotheistic, backward, Middle Eastern religion which belongs in the Old World, not the New World. They want to bring Socialism to the United States, because they are Socialists. This is why the feel the need to spread the “Equality Lie” everywhere they go, and to everybody within earshot. They need to preach “Equality”, when in fact, equality does not exist, never existed once in human history, and will never exist in the future. Nature is Unequal and Inequal. There is never a balance of power, and even if relationships come close to a balance of power, then this does not endure forever or for long lengths of time. Equilibrium does not exist naturally or effortlessly. Power is required to maintain Equilibrium.

Therefore, “Equality” and balance, require Power. This power is an “equal but opposite” reaction, to a preconceived (and already apparent), a priori action.

In Jewish and Christian families, a great force, power, and energy must become maintained with respect to the lie of Egalitarianism. Children are not equal with each other. The Jew and the Christian does not love his or her children “equally”. This is the full depth of the lie, and represents its fullest effects. A parent, father or mother, does not love each child “equally”. Actually, there is Favoritism. This was best recently extrapolated by Mitchell Heisman - Suicide Note. In this “Suicide Note” of an Ashkenazi, German Jew, Heisman demonstrates the baseline duality between biological Egalitarianism and Favoritism. The “burden of proof” is on Jews and Christians in every sense of life, to emphatically and publicly prove the existence of Egalitarianism. But is this ever accomplished? The answer is no. Because what does it mean to treat genetic offspring, within a family, “equally”? And what does it mean to treat all children of the Earth (all humans) “equally”?

This would necessitate, immediately, the adoption of Bastards and Bastard children, into biologically isolated families and “genetic circles”. Therefore, what the Nihilist religions justify by prescription of their dogmas, is the caring for bastard children and “exclusive genes”. In other words, Judæo-Christianity is itself a bastard ideology. It supports Bastard-ism. It encourages Bastard-ism. And this is most obvious by their concept of an “Invisible God” as an “Invisible Father Figure”. God is invisible, in Judaism and Christianity, precisely because God is a Bastard Figure. It is an abandoning deity. It is an irresponsible deity.

What Jews and Christians promote most of all, is for you to care for the degenerate biological offspring of irresponsible mothers and fathers.

In other words, because some scum, degenerate, Latina gets fucked and impregnated in Middle School, and has a bastard child with a bastard father, that YOU AND I need to care for this scum. We need to sacrifice, and pay taxes, and feed this scum as if it were my child! And then, the Nihilist religions has the audacity to tell me that I need to treat this bastard mother, bastard father, and bastard child as if we are “equal”? As if we have the same Morality, the same Ethics, the same Spirituality? And furthermore, I owe it. I owe them, automatically.

And not just I, but you owe them. You owe them your money, your time, your care, your guidance, your hospitality, your compassion, your mercy. You should be adopting all the bastard children of the world. Aren’t you Jewish? Aren’t you Christian? This is what you preach. Then why are you, yourself, not following what you preach? Why are you not caring for your neighbor’s children? Why aren’t you parenting all children? Why are their homeless people, are these not your brothers and sisters, your children on the street? Why are you not “caring”?

Because Liberal Egalitarianism is a lie, and an all too obvious lie. And this lie has gone far enough.

I was a airborne infantryman, of the 1-501st, and was in the triangle of death, and was exploded a few times, and had mortars fired at me, and shots taken, and missiles launched. I suspect I have a more objective understanding of the metaphysics of our psychology surrounding death and motivations, a little bit more than the average person on this forum- no offense to you. Do you have a better set of experiences, have you ever sought out such risks with a purpose in your heart, with a understanding? Ever had your beliefs severely tested in the heat of the mess? The name Onasander should say it all.

The English language necessitates apparently many contradictions- if I am to preach the message of your word faithfully, I will need to understand what must be, from my understanding and past point of view, discrepancies in this statement.

If I go to a Judaeo-Christian dominant population- say, the army of the united states of America, and preached this message in the tent chapels of Afghanistan, how would I explain to them that they are NOT THERE AS JEWS OR CHRISTIANS fighting against the Taliban’s desires using a WTP of their own, in helping the population in avoiding learned actions such as Hatred, Violence, Crime, Rape, Murder, and needless Death? After all, both they and the local Taliban were both once children, children born into this world NOT RAPING, NOT COMMITTING VIOLENCE, and certainly not full of hatred. A Child desires his mother’s nip, for the milk. The negativity exposed to us as we grow determine to a large extent who we become, and vice versa. How do I explain to these misled troops that violence is what made Benjamin Franklin aspire to experimenting with his Kite in the thunderstorm, discovering in the process electricity? surely it was the beatings of his betters that made him see farther, and endeavor to do better. If was the lunchtime bullies that made Tesla and Edison into such great men.

I am too weak of a mind to grasp what you are saying here without your guidance, and desire you to elucidate on this topic more. How does WTP create? And why is it apparently the Jews and Christians doing most of the heavy intellectual lifting in todays world? Can the message of WTP exist as you express it in a world that has actively embraced our ideals for very long?

Man is in a struggle against Agony? But you told me men are naturally evolving in a emotive monism towards time:

Your asserting a psychological state of being independent of temporal understanding of all other aspects of the awareness of time, in reaction to ‘Agony’, in producing a progressive Agogany, a successive hierarchy of awareness of being above other states of existence.

So, if we hold one awareness of time, subjectively viewed through the overman as supreme, but also recognize there is no upper level, that not seeking absolute power is a perversion, and it’s vice versa, seeking it is a virtue, and you provide us with seven well thought out methodologies for seeking it out, I ask- how does this Emotive Monism we seek equal what you say here:

Does every organism desire will to power, or is every organism already will to power, leaving the statement will to power as relatively valueless in terms of semantic identity, as no organism can in actuality attain it in and of itself except through the aegis of another?

For example, I am a individual plankton, and I desire will to power, as I am a lifeform. I achieve it over another organism- however big, however small. Has the plankton changed it’s nature in a successive Agagony against the Agony that drove it in such a way that it’s both subjectively aware and objectively aware of it at the same time? Is a virus aware that it has attained power over a much larger and more complex organism.

Please examine this conception of ‘desire’ and explain it to me better, both in terms of ‘time’ and in terms of the construction of biology and resource acquisition. Does the will to power of a bacterium eating non-sentient precious metals in a underground mine in South Africa equal the will to power of a bacterium that eats another bacterium, and is it’s will to power different from a bacterium that attacks humans? How is the awareness of the moment, and the emotive forces that drive the bacterium into a stage of bacterial adulthood biologically noted by a scientist? Can we extract, through clever means of synthetic agriculture, the WTP mechanisms of a billion billion bacterium into a highly condensed serum, and inject it’s pure, raw, WTP into a human who’s body mass is much less than that of a bacterium, making a super emperor?

After all, we are but cells. If every living organism has this desire, and we desire the power, we should be able to isolate and farm the power from lower creatures, exploiting it. We can then provide the pure, unadulterated will to power of smaller, lesser, inconsequential organisms to humans in a much purer, exacting formula.

I can start a business for us selling pharmaceutical grade, pure Will to Power, and people can take daily injections of it, and we can all live like Olympians, through scientific, measured dosages that push the limits of our biology to it’s ultimate max potential. After all, that is what we desire- doing this will allow boys to become men, correct?

We can become gods by harvesting the powers of plankton. This is what Nietzsche wanted after all, correct?