Let’s talk about inner peace.
I think I have it, most of the time.
Some times things are nasty, but those nasties are temporary.
My default is peace, harmony, tranquility, silence, emptiness.
Getting here wasn’t easy, but it was natural.
I’m so glad and happy that i have inner calm.
It’s very important to me.
Struggle percolates within oneself at all times.
Peace is a measurement of war. It’s about accepting the world and the self, as it is. To make peace is to accept war.
Strength a measure of weakness; knowledge a measure of ignorance; I a measure otherness.
Peace is a final rest from existence - death wish.
Death does not end the flux an organism experiences as struggle, it simply makes one unaware of it.
Without struggle there is no life, no consciousness, no evolution, progress, change, overcoming, advancing…
Peace is atrophying, stagnation, degeneration.
Not in hyperdimensional mirror realities.
Those are retirement from negative zero sum realities.
You can be invigortatively fit without any exercise.
Just to name one perk of them.
It’s infinite retirement.
In hyperdimensional mirror realities you can also see the life you were ‘meant’ to live instantaneously while living the life you want to live.
So that the literal assumptions may be modified as to form comprehensions inversely from configurations which preceded literal interpretations, the best way to conceive the sense of peace, is to understand peace through it’s brokenness i through it’s apparent fracture, that is, peace’s broken from cohesion, uniformed in disarray, whereas a comprehensive Peace can only be described after all the pieces fitting through higher order symbolism.
For instance the Vedic symbol of the swastika represents an inversion of the direction of the flow, within which the compartmentalizes bits may be placed in misalinement, therefore setting up the flow of energy from the will to singular power utilization, rather than assume a natural flow.
I have never seen someone play the Court Jester as well as you.
In reflective mirror realities, the structural basis may apparently be sound, and the instant test of soundness, or equilibrium may have to be tested, perverseal of engineered exact configuration. Analysis per re flexion, mirroring back the state of such constructions may have changed in that very instant
I’m going to walk right off the plane of existence towards my realm of all my dreams coming true without harming a single being.
Wish I could do likewise but dreams of such as that may not avail such easy transfer, hence jump back into uncertainty , but working through it,
I do more and more believe in dreams such as avail through the many levels which have to travelled their intended meanings, such as the miracle of that ( the dream) can disclose how to go about realizing them.
Pony being, that many states have to be overcome, without the necessarily encountering the exclusive pleasurable principle violating anyone’s consent.
reflection reduces toward the very duplicity that instigates a paradox there.
My life is to do the hard work so that it’s mass produced and becomes easier for all beings.
All hail messiah!
He has returned to be crucified, once more, on our behalf.
A saviour, like all of his genitally mutilated kind.
Benevolent do-goders that are unjustifiably resented and admonished for their sacrifices.
Hasn’t he returned to save us, once more, from nature?
Hell he calls it…paradise to those who accept his gift.
Lorikeet. You’re a moron sometimes.
Was Henry Ford the messiah for popularizing the assembly line? He certainly didn’t invent it. Someone In Europe invented it.
Was he the messiah?
Just because I’m a spiritual singularity doesn’t make me a messiah.
You’re projecting too much out of envy.
I think the dream my miracle or the miracle of my dream alludes and verifies that an artificial intelligence take up the cross, again for fear of becoming a double cross, to approach the probability of that natural function to not only appear certain but in essence become certainty It’self, while safeguarded by an involving structural change noted by Ec,but already delimited from the 2nd Vatican Ciuncil to the present time.
Jeolousy is really a manifestation of an underlying vanity that has been the crux of the overall reflective hyper dimensional exclusive pleasure , limited by the ebbing of the power to will such.
We rede the same boat front to aft, limited by propositional uncertainty.
He was warned by Dostoevsky to rely on structural changes of the church, to secure against things like that occurring, hence grounding against ungirceeable rashness of an effort to self victimize,
Your replies disappoint me.
To achieve inner peace, follow the stoics.
Less is more, more or less.
How shall I put this…simplicity, Clarice.
Marcus Aurelius.
What does he seek this…man of yours?
An undeniable parallel with Dostoevsky’s Ridiculous Man, is it not?
The unnamed man who returns to Eden, finding not Satan, but himself as the original sin that contaminated it, and now seeking to rebuild paradise on earth through a feverish religious proselytizing of love, atoning eternally for what he is, and what he did. Loving everyone, equally and eternally, and hating only himself. The Underground Man, on the other hand, had the rare dignity to live in Hell.
I disappoint myself, as well, for the connecting sacred and profane are Herculean tasks. The nihilistic strain left unresolved disconnect and leave parts of prior synapses unattached and chaotically misaligned.
In fact I have never abandoned a position which takes a mean attempt that does serve an equal weight to both, in a general sense, providing political conformity between both, the political and social relevance to uphold a post scripted faith in the common value in life, and the natural reflexive process that needs a growth toward a compensation toward the fill that faithlessness requires.
Human nature is different than the earlier roots where from he developed, that development left the original aboregenese vacuum that was provided by the adoption of understandable notions that could be understood at that time.
After two thousand years of evolution and transcendental change, Descartes through Nietzche and beyond, the methodology had to account for the change that turned sharply from idealistic representation of ideas to that of material, that transition evident in the initial distinction between the two differing, parallel processes.
Nowadays that very same principle has been upended to signal differences in cyber processing.
So there is a continuum, and the sacredness of it’s understanding could only withstand so much force at the floodgates, before it became evident that the holding back of the will of understanding became an impossible task.
When inner peace is desired , the outer forces of human experience can no longer be resisted, so that the only solution to be had is conversion, for those who can not avail themselves to give inner sight, insight, a chance to equalize pressures, for the inner sanctum for some is founded not on a rock of auto suggestion, but in reality a reasonably predicated break through of forces which reason can no longer explain,
The fact that there is so much pressure dealt out of this notion, has to do with political justifications that put both Socrates and Jesus Christ to death.
The parallelisms do not ever go away, unless some nominal terms are switched around, to reflect a need for a convenient revision.
_
Inner peace —> seek, and you will find it.