My abstract
The fundamentals of cause and effect show absolutely (absolute), it would be is impossible to have a thing (anything) without a cause, thats a + b. There must be a reason for something, and a reason behind something and necessarily (first and foremost) there must be rational technique (thought) behind something, (its saying inthe beging there must have rstional thought, that something doesnt come from nothing) it’s “how it got there” (this isn’t simple either because this also deals with the rational reason why a thing is anywhere or how it got there) within the realm of the rational, (which is our universe since logic over sees and governs all things prolific and lasting like nature and its successes and the funtions of science, because it works, non linear dynamics), everything that is has an explainable function that is mathematically pliable (leveragable, covered by logic or explainable) (convergent, rational), a certive behind a procession of events.
The reasons can be explained
If all things that happen are only possible to (the only thing absolutely that can happen is whats possible, this that can fall off the table ONLY because its in accordance with mathematical possibility, the universe as we know it, math) begin with then only what’s possible can happen, the first cause must have been a deliberate and intelligent one (it precluded all dignant and pro vast sytems of logic and functioning mathematics comprised in the cosmos, it includes all systems of intellignce which govern there states of success, logic and benevolance which govern there proliferation as positive traits). In the beginning something had rational thought, decided and said “be”, something had a sinew of context.
For a thing to be probable, it must be possible.
It seems implausible because to first have something you must first have something (to have a first act without a reason would be act because nothing intelligent would have facilitated its creation/design), and consequently to have absolutely nothing, is impossible, (this states both something must be possible to happen and that nothing is impossible, to have something there must be something because something cannot come from nothing, nothing is mathematically zero and no different from arithmetic, its only a theoretical play on words a lack of evidence that says things appear as though in quantum mechanics that they come from “now where” though thing irrevocably come from somewhere and for some reason, thats absolute, unless theres a heaven and we cant explain why somethings happening) something always has to be (thats the paradox of cause and effect, countinuously you need a cause for things to where you go infonitley back, coupled with the fact that you need an intelligent reason why thing just randomly appear unless there is no sinew of thought behind why things just happen in the universe like a program on a computer that just makes enviornemnt in which things grow, i mean for no reason at all, theres nothing dictating a generated world) (Arthor Schopenhauer’s SR, for everything that is there must be a reason behind it and further more it must be a rational reason, the fact that everything has a reason means that the reason must be and can be explainable, things are logic, truth is real). The conditions of nothing are, absolute zero, nothing (is finite, thats exact math, nothing means nothing, the supposition of nothing is zero, without a thing, these are NOT arguable anymore than zero in math is zero and no 1 or 2 or so on, the logical law of identity also prevents this) but I can attempt to suggest the value of existence and being by understanding its regards, purposes / importances / valuations and facts (short story, its logic, everything successful in the universe is logical and logic is not ambiguous). Rational thought tells us that something is, “I think, therefore, I am”, interestingly enough, without offending some of the counter measures of the utility of survival, part of the intrigue of existence is to consider (period without fail, almost every philosopher talks about this), its logical relevence is astute and straight forward (a + b), you only are if you think, certainly you only live if you think (furthermore, you only live if you understand and so on, the more you understand the more you see, the more you live, thats absolute, the more you know the more you see the more alive you are, those who eperience more are alive more, thats math, understood more). In the beginning something had rational thought, decided and said “be”, something had a sinew of thought and said something was anything at all and that this should be “this” and not that, or other.
(I said this because the farther you go back in considerations to cause and effect and it paradox the more the existence of an intelligence says it is with what is in the cosmos, and its inherent that to be something has to be single a first sense of thought in a cause by saying a not b or c not a, things just dont appear, we would expect things to just randomly appear then right? Instead of having reasons)
“That there should be something specific and not another thing”
There is valuation, things are redeeming
There must be an intelligent technique behind the conditions of the universe, the conditions of cosmos speak to the authenticity of a heliocentric / and relativistic, gravity centric cosmos; this universe is not random.
Creation is of a naturally positive (its positive because it teaches to succesful things and allows you makes your own things, to proliferate) and redemtive (all things are redemtive, all things come back under proliferating, intelligent, healthy and rational conditions, truth sets all things free, understanding and knowledge are true, true things are always made a new because true things always proliferate, always last, don’t grow old, nature and God always rewards what is true) ordanance or value (because it is learned from, making it redemtive and of a conductive nature) is a mathematical pretense, of evolutionary and benificially successful clauses (successful and intelligent traits), governed by logical preludes (these preludes or facts understand things to be harmonic and rightful and are supported by evidence)
Most of this is backed up by current philosophical thought^
Creation is inclusive (this is a certive statment, creation is inclusive of things that are logical)
Cause and effect are paradoxical
When you appreciate, things are redeemed because appreciation is truth, truth is redeemed, true things live and are always glory, knowledge is appreciable to those who adhere.
A thing must first exist in order for there to be anything at all thing and a cause precludes a dicisive choice, before that there must be a thing or cause for there to be that series of cause and effect and even before that there must be a cause, go far down enough you get to where it is impossible. You could never reach a spot outside the cosmos where there was wall and no back to it or else you would be forced to ask what was on the other side and determine there must be a rational explanation because there wouldnahve to be a reason for the wall, a cause and then beyond that, making it paradoxical, there must continutously be a cause to something, there no final wall beyond our universe that says, thats it, no more… You don’t defy graphic sensibility.
So where is our first cause/action since the fundamentals of cause and effect seem to be removed from conventional thought, there must be a beginning, this is not without logical authority as to how we can have a thing without a reason/cause, its not plausable or would seem paranormal, although the alternative also seems to defy logic. It’s that the outside of our universe is infinite space because there can not be an end to existence where it says stop without there being reason.
God cannot have a beginning, the God i described couldn’t be “created”, whatever created God would be God and cause and effect seem to have no beginning because you never run out of the need for a cause or for God to show up and say hey no one created me and it is impossible for something to come from nothing (null, zero mathematical nothing) without a reason…
-Nathan Perry