intelligent design

I think that the ecosystem we live in sustains our “shape”. For we do nothing but react to our environment. If we drink too much our body reacts/ adapts, and creates an alcoholism gene. For people with the alcoholism gene have a higher tolerance to alcohol, and feel more natural using alcohol for the first time. While building a tolerance to alcohol creates adaptations and physical dependency, so that you subconsciously make up reasons to drink.

It is learning the nature of our bodies that is important, so we can supplement it with lifestyles and environment.

Cancer is the rapid reproduction of cancer cells because of the introduction of unnatural substances. Our bodies were conditioned for farm life, now we have changed our environment, and intake. Is DNA recombination a likely answer to these problems??? I think the more natural way would be. (But go ahead and recombine animal DNA,… see what that does to our ecosystem)

Now psychologically I see another purposeful design. The difference between males and females was created to consolidate life’s needs into roles toward each other. So in truth, love between the sexes is the most intimate way to guide us to spiritual perfection. In fact males that marry more then one female will overcompensate for the extra estrogen, and become bias in their soul. Hence mid-east views on women.

Would you mind producing some evidence of this specific gene being created in an individual? Where is this gene in the genome, and can you show me the expression of it?

That’s only partially true… some cancers are caused by external substances but some are caused by idiopathic and autopathic mutations. Not all cancers are caused by unnatural substances. Indeed, superoxide radicals are now thought to major contributors to some types of cancers but these are not unnatural substances, they come to exist as a byproduct of our body’s natural processes.

You’ve claimed this before but have yet to show any evidence that males and females were created to consolidate needs into roles.

Well, I believe that GABRA2 is the alcoholism gene he is referring to. Pretty good corrolation with that one.

Otherwise, I’ll let you handle this one gemty.

There is no alcoholism gene, K?

I dropped a glass of water just recently… It shattered all over the floor. I was upset. I figure that since the glass shattering made me upset, and that it was such a complex event, that someone had it out for me. I came to the conclusion that god decided to intervine, and destroy my glass of water.

Well, it’s not an alcoholism gene in the Genetic Calvinist sense, as with all things in science, it is merely a statistic. If you have a certain mutation in this gene, you are predisposed towards alcoholism.
Naturally, if you don’t drink or drink sanely, this won’t be an issue. However, given two heavy drinkers, people with the mutation are more likely to become alcoholics.

BTW, Alder, what’s your take on ADHD? I’m fairly certain it doesn’t exist, at least not to the extent that it is treated for . . . but I’m not a professional.

It’s been shown that people born with the alcaholism gene have a higher tolerance to alcahol the very first time they drink. This has been shown through reaction time tests. Now why would I make this up?

What triggers cancer cells to all of a sudden react??? Are they more sensitive to enviormental changes, Or a ticking time bomb waiting to blow up just because the way you were born.

As for the consolidation of lifes needs into roles toward eachother. Men are naturally better at some things, women are naturally better at other things. It’s called the difference between estrogin and testosterone. For the entire exsistance of time men and women played roles toward each other. Only recenently has life been secure enough for these roles to be relaxed. Maybe that’s what makes you think that men and women are made equal toward each other. Why do I have to explain such bluntly obvious things??? Ohh,… liberalist brain washing.

anythings possiable when you have no basis for reasoning. Right??? So we have proven nothing but that certain gene’s exsist in certain people with certain diseases. So who am I to say why? I guess I understand that dinosaurs were so big because they have adapted to their enviorment. I guess I understand that the anorexia gene is a mental disorder with physical side effects. What’s more likely,… pre programmed mental disorders of anorexia,… or the body adapting to starving and getting used to what ever pain killers it might release to numb the pain. Why is obesity a problem now,… when it’s been shown that the amish have almost no obesity,… probably because of lifestyles. We were used to a natural lifestyle,… I’d hate to see our bodies adapt to anything else.

It’s all about the soul. For we would not be so far above the animals without the soul. It gives us the desire to rise above being an animal. While animals only react to their bodies. We have an abstract reasoning that preceeds all brain funtions.

Science will always fall short unless it realises about the soul. It will never cure depression unless it changes the way people think. It will never cure drug problems unless it changes the way people spend their free time when desireing the excitment were used to from TV.

We will always have all these worldly problems unless we rise above the spiritual problems that plague us.

Xunzian:
thanks for the info on GABRA2, interesting stuff indeed. Its like you said though, genes don’t play an exclusive role in alcoholism. Even if you carry the mutated gene you won’t necessarily become an alcoholic.

It would be interesting to study the natural history of the gene’s expression and development throughout generations. Is it’s expression up- or down-regulated throughout generations based on some identifiable factor - like exposure to alcohol. In other words, does a parent’s exposure to alcohol (or other factors) affect the likelihood that their offspring will carry the gene.

Phil27of79:

  1. Cancer cells do not “all of a sudden react.” The development of cancer does not occur overnight. It isn’t one day I’m healthy, the next day I have a malignant tumor. Cancerous cells are of course affected by genetics and external factors, but they also develop idiopathically, without benzene or genetic predisposition.

  2. I’m not a liberal, so liberalist brainwashing isn’t why you have to explain the roles that men and women have to play towards each other. What you have to explain to me is what those roles and needs are. And, would you please explain what things men are better at than women, and vice versa?

Not true I’m afraid. None of our brain function is preceded by abstract reasoning. In fact, all of our brain function precedes abstract reasoning. Reasoning is the highest on the pyramid, not the lowest. Want proof? When you’re asleep, you don’t reason, but you keep breathing, and keep moving, and you’re body keeps doing the millions of things that your brain tells it to even though reasoning has been suspended.

cheers,
gemty

Intelligent Design

The brain is a receptacle for the soul. It gives us abstract thought that precedes all brain functions. This is the reason humans have evolved so far above animals. We have spiritual desires to rise above the animals. While tribal culture makes them self satisfied with little motivation to invent new. This spiritual force is what makes the arts so appealing. Biochemistry is mathematical and not abstract. If all we knew was the body, we’d be very mathematical in how we react to things. Yet the soul precedes all brain function,… making even brain functions seem spiritual to the soul.

The void of hope is depression. Biochemistry would say there is hope chemicals and then there is nothing. Yet pimps have been known to use cocaine to get hookers to feel good while they do things. And no good psychologist will put you on antidepressants without a therapist to help you examine the thought process that allows you to be depressed. This tells me that the brain reacts to the soul’s energy.

The paranormal activity of ghosts is only witnessed by the side effects of ghosts. They never witnessed anything tangible beyond cold spots and electromagnetic activity. This tells me that the soul is energy independent of physical energy,… but it charges physical matter in abstract ways. (The catholic churches unofficial stance on ghosts is that interacting with ghosts will give them power. And my stance is that ghosts are souls who were denied entrance into heaven.)

…

Now intelligent design says that everything has a purpose. I believe that the purpose of the body lies in conditioning. Buddhists have perfected ways of conditioning the body to do things as a reflex (martial arts). Like this, we do things without thought all the time. We go though the process so many times, it becomes subconscious. Like driving while deep in thought, or striking out every time you get frustrated. Yet base ball pitchers will practice their pitches until they can do it without thought under great pressure. I picture it like this, the more you use a thought the deeper it gets,… just like a river. So we need to watch what we flood our mind with.

Intelligent design also says that the creator knows what’s best for us. This is why I say there are certain things that are absolute. For we are all the same in the spirit and out creator wouldn’t want our spirit to become perverse because of our experiences. So I began to see that, sex outside of love is only limited by what you are willing to try. It changes how we prioritize things, and if you prioritize sex over love, you will change the way you view people. Then this changes how you treat people and what you respect in people. While sex as an expression of love makes it an unselfish act. It becomes a reward for getting you marriage to work. And tries to insure kids will only be raised in loving households.

Even further down this path I see that, the difference between men and women was created to consolidate life’s needs into roles toward each other. Since the soul is neither male nor female, I say it takes love between the sexes to give us the most intimate way of looking beyond these differences. Only recently has life been secure enough for these roles to be relaxed, but it doesn’t mean the differences have been erased. If a man marries more then one woman, they will overcompensate for the extra estrogen and become bias toward testosterone in order to compensate. The main way they do this is by limiting what they get from women in order to ensure their masculinity. This is dangerous because they can learn this biasness into their soul,… and their lifestyle wouldn’t allow them to ever escape from this biasness. While in the past men and women had friendships from work, what little time they had for intimacy (also talking about life) was spent well toward bridging the gaps between them.

…

Now conditioning our bodies can also be from drugs. If we build a tolerance, it means we have adapted to the drug. Witch means our body has gotten used to the drug, and if we quit, our body subconsciously pulls us back to the drug. Why? Take cigarettes for example. When you start using them, it makes you relaxed (probably because of the smoke, and smoke is a sedative). Yet when you build a tolerance and get used to cigarettes, your body depends on them to feel normal, and without them you get agitated. This is because the drugs in your blood stream cause brain chemistry changes, and your body is trying to get back to normal. Normal while you are smoking means what ever chemicals that make you agitated. Then you quit, and you are left with the agitation chemicals. This is the very way that marijuana is addictive. Yet marijuana limits your ability to multitask, slows your reflexes like one or two shots of alcohol, and puts you in a passive mood toward everything. That’s why it can be a gateway drug,… you’re passively likely to accept other drugs.

Yet the reason people do drugs is because they are unsatisfied with life. They see all the excitement and drama on TV, and want something that’s just as easy (an instant gratification at the touch of a button). The biblical answer to this is to find content ness with life. For life is content ness with moments of stress to gain moments of happiness. All of this gives you a content smirk as your demeanor toward life. If your demeanor is anything but this, maybe you need to reexamine things. For if you’re too happy, maybe you just ignore the stress,… or push it off on someone else. If you’re angry or sad, maybe you’re just focusing on the wrong things. We can find so much spiritual satisfaction in helping others. I think this is called practicing love. For the biblical structure for life is as servants toward each other, witch would take love to begin with. Just like any relationship, a good person gives as much as they take. IE, businesses will consolidate their strengths in order to ease your life, and you give them money to show your appreciation. Yet, employees that find value in good work, usually have a better demeanor toward life.

How should I explain what is so obvious. You know how they have changed the SAT’s to make it equal to the sexes? Well…

How would you prove that bestiality is wrong? If you say it’s wrong because they cannot reproduce, then I can say that homosexuality is wrong because they cannot reproduce. Yet the most I’ve herd a literalist say is that,… “It is wrong to have sex with an animal because they cannot consent.”. Yet the next time a dog is humping your leg, tell me he didn’t consent.

Do you realize what I just said? It is hypocritical to believe that bestiality is wrong.

Yet it is wrong. Why? For the same reason sex out side of love is wrong. Sex outside of love makes getting off the priority,… and then getting off is only limited to what you’re willing to try. You can say you control this all you want, but the nature of what you do, is what you become. I can show you examples of this all you want, just name the situation.

I have herd liberalists say that, “the only thing wrong with incest is getting your family pregnant. Yet I say that, you not being able to find a love to have sex with is wrong. Then that brings to mind what I’ve herd people say about this,… “I love all my friends.” Yet the love I have for a spouse is deeper then any friendship. This is so much like liberalists saying, “all gay men don’t have anal sex.” Yet what is the nature of who you are. And I always said that gay people become bias toward estragon and testosterone. This is biasness learned into the soul. After all what do gay people have to naturally direct them away from biasness. Yet, liberalists say, “don’t judge me by what I do, but who I want to be.” That’s the wussification of America,…”I didn’t want to screw up, why didn’t you baby proof the world for me.”

So what reasoning do we have! You want to throw away reasoning against bigamy,…in order to protect homosexuality. I guess we have to learn from the models God gave us. The difference between men and women is general. SO that, you automatically label me as being linear (not seeing the gray area), or vague. Yet, they had to change the SAT’s, in order to make them gender friendly. I’ll tell you now,… that the things women have to do to compete with men, will never put them in the running with men. The best man will always be better at things then the best women. And vice versa. Just because men are more physical/analytically based, doesn’t mean that it’s selective breeding. It has been proven that men do not have brains like women until they take testosterone blockers, and estragon pills. Only then do brain scan paterns change. This opens up the soul differently to the real world. The nature of humanity requires us to look beyond the sexes. This is most intimately done through love. I well proved there is little or no room to show biochemistry dictates sexual preference,… When what triggers endorphins is completely up to the personal taste of the soul.

This all but proves that psychology is figureing out what we want,… Then how to manipulate people into following that. Just like psycholgists do in advertisming agnencies, more then practical products. It’s not what it’s actually worth,… But what you believe it’s worth. In this, the disposable world is more practical. In this, the instant gratification world is more practical.

ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/vi … p?t=147874