Nothing I haven’t seen before, even on TV I am sure you can see things like this, except I don’t watch TV. Honestly she isn’t that great. Desensitization, desensitization all over.
Looks like a plastic barbie doll. lmfao
You do realize girls with some meat on their bones 50 years ago were the beautiful right? Kind of funny how it’s anorexia that is “Beauty” now right, there’s some evidence for your beauty being determined, that it is subjective. lmfao
Artimas, I’m assuming that you are, probably, a female - a not so good looking one. And these pictures of goddesses make you feel inferior and envious. I don’t write this in spite; just being blunt.
There is a reason why she is a super-model. And it’s not because she is imaginarily attractive.
I’m a man… a man with a beard, just not a dog. There’s a difference between a dog and a man.
The reason she’s a super model is because she wanted to be a super model of which she has traits determined by the majority to make her eye candy.There must be a reason why honey boo boo is a show, surely it’s not because they’re great actors. It’s because of desensitization of sex. She is imaginarily attractive, to me she isn’t that great, to you she is a “goddess” even though I bet she doesn’t know how to use that brain of hers to full function seeing as the majority don’t and make things on top of which are so petty.
I’m a god myself, every human being is a god or goddess. Get with the program, it isn’t based solely of physical traits/attraction. Anyone with a half working mind can realize what they are.
Unless that man is a dog - and I’m not speaking of looks here. That’s a man thingy to speak in that way.
But some men are like dogs - even though I love dogs and wolves.
So - I’m a dog, because I appreciate women’s physical beauty and rank them accordingly? Also, I’ve made comments about how I find intelligence to compliment a woman’s physical beauty three-fold. I don’t merely focus on physicality.
Just out of curiosity, name a woman who you find to be stunningly beautiful, Artimas.
Wolves are my favorite animal. Huskies are my favorite dogs. Perhaps dog isn’t a great comparison, since animals don’t really care about fur patterns and looks when determining their mates, or maybe they do, who knows.
Dogs aren’t capable of influencing the world as we can, they are great companions. But when I see a human being wasting their mind on the petty things, it only shows me they are squandering their god-like abilities for something that does not truly matter. If you want the title of god, then you need to show that you are one.
Not saying that’s why, I am saying because you are focusing on something that isn’t really important. Squandering your abilities as a human being with rating people’s beauty, when you could be creating something with that mind of yours instead of rating and ego-boosting what someone else has. There are a lot of women beautiful, but then I cannot say all because some women are wretched human beings as some men are. Women birth the human race and other races which is probably the most productive thing that can be done, by producing more productivity. What’s the point of ranking, to create competition?
What do you hope to accomplish by the evaluation of ‘beauty’, create more stereotype?
Beautiful woman, hm… how about a black hole or the universe.
Artimas - I’m an artist and women inspire me immensely.
To claim that focusing on the beauty of women is trivial, I find absurd; it’s like telling a scientist that his fascination for the beauty of nature ( symbolic woman ) is trivial.
Women/beauty are hobbyhorses of mine. If you find that banal, then why even bother?
.
Nothing but the world and everything in it. Even the universe revolves around humanity Artimas. We are it and we are in a sense in deep space too. There are many things which revolve around our world, Artimas.
.
Oh, and tell me just how does it make that noise? I may be wrong but I would need the scientific proof for that.
What does the above have to do with this? That makes no sense to me but if you explain it to me it might.
I realize that reality IS no matter whether this or that has been discovered as of yet. Things are as they are. But nothing can be perceived without a perceiver. i need you to explain how a tree falling in a forest and no one there to hear it can still be heard?
It does not matter if we are here or not. A tree falling makes a sound, it’s just what it is and does. Similarly it doesn’t matter if we said the world was flat, it was always round. Regardless of what we say about it, regardless of our being.
It does not revolve around us because if it did, it would be obligated to make sense, or care. Which it doesn’t make sense, or care, not remotely. It never revolved around us, why do you think we’re here in this position that we are in? From mistaking that it does, selfish-importance and greed.
I didn’t say it could be heard or not, I said it made a noise. Usually when things fall to the ground they make noises on impact, right? A tree being big, why wouldn’t it, regardless of us being there to hear it a noise would still be made. If a lightning bolt hits the ground and no one is there to hear it, does the thunder still roll? Yes, the thunder still comes.
Animals would hear the tree falling, not only humans. Animals of which some were here long before us, yet we claim this world revolves around ‘us’. That’s just the human ego.
So why side with the ones making unnecessary comments that imply women as sexual objects in your thread of supposed evaluation of beauty.
A scientist doesn’t make unnecessary comments about their art, why would they. Doesn’t tell a tree “Oh, you gotta work on that trunk or those leaves.” similar to “Oh, gotta tone up those thighs” or “i’d fuck her so hard.” lmao
Inspire to do what? if women inspired you, you would not only find comfort/pleasure in the ones dominantly voted by majority most “beautiful”.
Thanks . I notice Erik influenced your choice of avatar and signature. Don’t let him provoke and reduce you to his level in his Aryanism thread, I think that’s precisely what he wants to do.
If you have any specific question, you know in which thread to ask. All I’ll say for now to avoid derailing the thread is that you don’t just wake up and go “holy shit, I’m asexual”, it was more like a gradual process caused by a number of factors, mostly I’d say learning about the male and female psychology and how they function at their core, and when I saw how applicable it is to real life and how shallow most people are the mental unattractiveness slowly grew and exceeded into a physical one as well.
It’s kind of like the god thing little Erik A real woman doesn’t give away her greatest mysteries except to the man she loves. I don’t know if you’ll ever receive those mysteries from a woman - you’ll need to be quite different than you are now.
I’ve been in love before, explored many feminine mysteries. I’m a good lover; loyal and passionate. Only had one real love; the rest were just play things. But yeah, that’s why I’m so fascinated/obsessed with women - because I’ve had a taste of feminine beauty.
Ha " Little Erik ". Not going to do away with that one, ay?
You’re right. And he is just projecting a past experience onto the falling tree scenario that you are suggesting. Because his experiencing structure has heard sounds every time his ear drum vibrated, he is shifting that experience onto all future potential ear -drum -stimulating events. That is what people do a lot of. They take their own experiences and the mental (interpretation) activity that created the results, then shift that whole process onto all other situations and expect similar success to occur in arriving at some accomplishment or answer. Yet some situations are not solvable or concluded in that manner.