Is Competition Ethical?

[James_S_Saint]

@CelineK

all life/entire cosmos depends on electricity, negative(feminine) and positive (masculine) charges, the Universe is obviously sexed. Matter is feminine and Light masculine, something hermeticists had already understood centuries ago. Matter is Light at different compression levels though, depending on the molecular structure we look at. That is precisely why the bible describes Eve (feminine principle) was created from Adam (masculine principle)'s rib. The singularity dividing itself into two.

I think that you are choosing the wrong word, “sex”, for what you are meaning. It is the synthesizing of distinction and/or polarity that is the necessary condition for creation. Sex refers merely to one specific example of recombinitorial synthesis. It isn’t coherent to refer to electrons and protons “having sex”. They combine in such a way as to composite an atom, but they do not combine such as to produce a third, an offspring, representative of portions of themselves synthesized. Pure mass is formed of the synthesis of positivity (construction) and negativity (destruction) which consumes and removes polarity all together. Mass could be thought of as an offspring or child of femininity and masculinity, but not of sex because it entire consumes the “parents” into the third entity.

And Eve was not created via sex, but rather sex was created via Eve.

The problem is that the analogy between men and women (and thus sex) and polarity synthesis isn’t exact. In one sense, the sense of being more free and flighty, the feminine is the electron whereas the heavier and more rigid proton is masculine.

But in another sense, because women are not pure feminine nor are men pure masculine, both women and men are of mass with merely slight differences in the center of their focus and the degree of their feminine and masculine traits. Without that commonality of the mostly neutral “mass”, they could not reproduce anything. And in the family structure as perceived in India, the woman is the more positive stable center (the proton) whereas the male is more flighty, loose, and negative. The West sees it from different perspective wherein the male is the stronger, heavier law giver and center of concern and thus center mass of the atomic family.

[Kriswest]

Celine, I will take the following position on this subject:
I am all for political borders being removed and only leaving health borders. There are diseases, infections that can be highly contagious to people not previously exposed or inoculated. As far as bigotry, it is rapidly being removed. On the whole there is far less hate and fear then ever before. Mixed families are darn near everywhere in most countries.
Earth itself created territories and ownership of land and resources . Humans are not the only animals to control resources. Any social creature has leaders, followers and territories. Some followers rebel, leave and start a new group with leaders and followers.

Humans in general do need to be controlled. Self control is not really a strong trait in this animal. Mostly because we are predatorial territorial animals.
If a human population has no direction , no reason to bond, there will be mass disasters. Pack/herd creatures need direction and control. When evolution is further along the need for outer control will be gone.

The video you posted is a rehash , edited , dramatized, twist on books. Do your own research, do not follow what suits your attitude or beliefs. Go beyond. What that vid is and does is no different then what it claims others do. It is brainwashing. It found you and many others that had a hint of dissatisfaction. It caresses it and massages it to a point that like a fish to a lure on a fishing pole, you get hooked. The objective of it is dissent and break away to form new groupings. You the follower, they are the leader. At first they will pretend to be something else, friend ,teacher, guru , etc. They bring you in and oh please follow this rule. Then ok but , let us do this and if you do not then this will occur to you or that… On an on until control is complete. You want to believe in these predatorial sentient critturs because they are emitting sounds and a scent that is familial.

We are not allowed to yell fire in a crowded building or area. People that riot tend to destroy their own community, not the object of their wrath. A sinking ship, a burning building, being cornered, being pushed ,causes emotional upheaval rather quickly (blame primitive adrenaline). People will harm or kill to protect their life and the life of those emotionally bonded to them. Excess emotions brainwash. Turn humans loose without governing and panic will ensue.

Have you not seen how idiotic humans can be? That is not from being dumbed down , it is from being controlled by emotions, chemical imbalance, hormones etc. Intelligent humans get idiotic. If people stop controlling several trillion humans , stop brainwashing several trillion humans in any form, chaos will take on a new meaning. Would that be ethical? No. Stop marketing to humans about luxuries and stories about others? Ethical ? Only if you want trillions of bored depressed humans struggling to find new entertainment and toys. Do you really want the violent sense of humor most have, uncontrolled and undirected? You see that as ethical? We are individual yet not. As a species we are all part of a whole. And that whole needs control. I could address other aspects of our confused sentient animal mentality but, I am hoping you get the drift.

There are millions of individuals that are not being affected by market brainwashing, they stand as the next step. Humanity will split apart. Not by race or religion but by intelligence and breeding for it. Hormones vs brains. Or geeks vs jocks.
Individual over species or species over individual. Present or future.
Your worries over the elite controling and brainwashing the masses is part of evolution. But, the real question is how to responsibly react or act.

[Arminius]

@CelineK

@Arminius

Most of all living beings, especially all oldest and most of the older species (thus the huge majority of all living beings) are not capable of having sex. They live without any sex or something like sex.

plz expound with examples…

Like I said: All oldest and most of the older species. Do you really not know those species?

[Arminius]

@James S Saint

@CelineK

all life/entire cosmos depends on electricity, negative(feminine) and positive (masculine) charges, the Universe is obviously sexed. Matter is feminine and Light masculine, something hermeticists had already understood centuries ago. Matter is Light at different compression levels though, depending on the molecular structure we look at. That is precisely why the bible describes Eve (feminine principle) was created from Adam (masculine principle)'s rib. The singularity dividing itself into two.

I think that you are choosing the wrong word, “sex”, for what you are meaning.

Yes, she uses the wrong word - “sex” - for what she is meaning.

[CelineK]

all matings of elements can be defined as sexual, thoughts too by extension since they are initiated by polarities. Positive vs negative. My book premise.

However, I follow the steps of Walter Russel’s cosmogeny and the Electric Universe theory. You will have to read the Universal One (free ebook on the net) by russell to see for yourself. I do not have the time to expound. No time for a 200+ page thread. PS: walter russell is the father of the electric universe theory. Your premise and mine are completely different and can only lead to a status quo.

Electricity (electromagnetism being its byproduct), is the Sexual Force holding the Universe together – and the core argument of my train of thoughts.

FULL QUOTE :
Sex is the fundamental principle of Creation. It is the dual desire force in Mind for expressing its One Idea. Without a division of the one unconditioned Light into two seemingly conditioned lights, Creation could not be. Sex is not a thing, it is a condition of a thing. An electrically balanced condition of anything is sexless whether it be a man, woman, electric battery, or the atmosphere. A sexed condition is an unbalanced condition. An electric battery which is fully charged is dually unbalanced by the opposite electric pressures of compression and expansion. These two opposite unbalanced conditions violently desire to return to the oneness of balance from which they were divided into two. A short circuit between the two poles of the battery will give it that balance. We then say it is dead, for it will no longer perform work by expressing its desire for balance … The sex matings of the elements exactly coincide in effect with the sex matings of humans. Violent explosions in the elements have the same basic cause as such violent explosions as murder in humans. Terrific electric unbalance is the cause of both. Likewise, stability in the elements and in humans has the same cause in equality of balance – Walter Russell’

I think that you are choosing the wrong word, “sex”, for what you are meaning. It is the synthesizing of distinction and/or polarity that is the necessary condition for creation. Sex refers merely to one specific example of recombinitorial synthesis. It isn’t coherent to refer to electrons and protons “having sex”. They combine in such a way as to composite an atom, but they do not combine such as to produce a third, an offspring, representative of portions of themselves synthesized. Pure mass is formed of the synthesis of positivity (construction) and negativity (destruction) which consumes and removes polarity all together. Mass could be thought of as an offspring or child of femininity and masculinity, but not of sex because it entire consumes the “parents” into the third entity.

And Eve was not created via sex, but rather sex was created via Eve.

The problem is that the analogy between men and women (and thus sex) and polarity synthesis isn’t exact. In one sense, the sense of being more free and flighty, the feminine is the electron whereas the heavier and more rigid proton is masculine.

But in another sense, because women are not pure feminine nor are men pure masculine, both women and men are of mass with merely slight differences in the center of their focus and the degree of their feminine and masculine traits. Without that commonality of the mostly neutral “mass”, they could not reproduce anything. And in the family structure as perceived in India, the woman is the more positive stable center (the proton) whereas the male is more flighty, loose, and negative. The West sees it from different perspective wherein the male is the stronger, heavier law giver and center of concern and thus center mass of the atomic family.