is IN/FINITE mistake in math?

[quantum]

At last math is based on existence.
have we some how predetermined the calculation of logic, before we understand the existence logic.
or

is it , existence logic not understood based on math logic ?

just for fun:
(in calculus,no matter what the event and substance is , they should be finite in accordance to law of conevation of mass !!, so einstein can never use word INFINITE!!!)

[Amorphos]

in calculus, no matter what the event and substance is, they should be finite in accordance to law of conservation of mass !!, so einstein can never use word INFINITE!!!)

Substances would be finite yes, but at the quantum level you cannot distinguish between things [being in more than one place etc], so naturally once you remove the cardinality you remove the limits and infinity = unlimited. Not to mention that reality is infinite and so at some level the universe must relate to that. I’d suggest that the QM level is exactly where that is occurring.

there are potentially infinite observational perspectives in relativity too.

[Arminius]

@quantum

At last math is based on existence.
have we some how predetermined the calculation of logic, before we understand the existence logic.
or

is it , existence logic not understood based on math logic ?

just for fun:
(in calculus,no matter what the event and substance is , they should be finite in accordance to law of conevation of mass !!, so einstein can never use word INFINITE!!!)

Einstein did not use the word “infinite”, because he did not believe in an infinte universe. There is no other meaning behind it than a religious, theological, metaphysical meaning.