She is making the same distinction as you are … between god and god god.
So she can call herself an atheist (which she did) and yet she supposedly believes in some sort of god, but she sees no evidence of the existence of any sort of god.
One would think that the distinction between theist and atheist is pretty simple and well defined.
phyllo ----does anyone have EVIDENCE of the existence of any sort of god…she is talking about scientific evidence…there isn’t any evidence right now…we may find evidence but we don’t know now…
Fundamental to every religion is that you can see some manifestation of God in the world. It would not make sense to say “this god exists but there are absolutely no signs of it in the world”.
The difference between a theist and an atheist:
Theist : that thing over there is a work of god and shows the existence of god.
Atheist : that thing over there is just a weird random thing and has nothing to do with a god.
in my mind there is no problem with god…god is everything…we know some about nature already and we will learn more…we will learn more about life and more about the universe…god is whatever nature is…and we are part of nature…and jesus has much to teach us…
Why call it god? Use the razor and get rid of god if you do not need him. If you did, then the world would have one less complication. Your life would be simpler.