if men did not orgasam would they have no time for women
In your case, I’d hope so.
Of course they would have time for women. It would just be better spent time. Talking (about important stuff not trying to impress each other), studying, working together, playing video games. The world would be a much better place.
Imagine what man could do if all his creative energy was not focused on getting laid.
Sex is not the only outlet for these pent up emotions. How much of these emotions are brought about because of sex or failure to get sex, anyway? Building bigger bombs is a different issue altogether, entirely unrelated and with different solutions. It would be each individuals choice what to do with their new found creativity and to deny them this gift because they might abuse it would be counterproductive. Instead new creative ways would most likely be established to prevent destructive behaviors from taking place. Besides isn’t every mad genius the result of a man who was rejected sex by some girl of his dreams and vows revenge against the world? This rejection would not take place if sex was not such a basic drive.
A lot of historical documententation exists of men whom are basically less interested in sex: Eunuchs.
Eunuchs have been found to provide a great deal of uses throughout history, particularly as loyal servants to royalty. As simple labourers, however, they were found to be more bitter and less manageable.
Sexually minimal men, it seems, are very stable well organized people when given a dignified stature, but they have less overall performance when it comes to hard labour.
I think the moral of the story for women is that indeed men in their natural state are motivated by sex beyond much of anything else. But in my mind women too often take for granted the simplicity of their advantage and want to immerse themselves in a soap opera of complicated affairs. Really, my philosophy on relationships falls in with the theoretical accuracy of explainations. The best is generally the simplest.
But then, this isn’t so objective. It’s been my experience that women everywhere are obsessed with immersing themselves in a soap opera. Simple arrangements are like kryptonite.
so far I have read 3 threads by this poster and they all have to do with men and orgasm.
WHAT IN THE WORLD IS GOING ON HERE I ASK?! 
Perhaps she´s a cynical man-hater assessing their motives.
She’s probably collecting the data for a thesis or book, or else the above is true 
and that would be just sad!
Bless her 
For what it´s worth, I´m male and assure her that my interest in females is not limited by seeing them as a prospect for an orgasm. But I´ll agree that the drive to sex can sometimes completely motivate men´s actions towards women.
You seen your avatar lately, Standard? 
…it seems to support your ‘drive for orgasm’ statement: more than your ‘not seeing them as a prospect for an orgasm’ statement.
I think ladyjane is secretly a 40 year-old male living somewhere near Tennessee and sexually frustrated enough to feel satisfaction in hearing talk of orgasm.
Standard’s avatar is . . . expressing her frustration with the existential dilemma. Isn’t that right?
LOL I shoulda seen that one coming. I´ll try and escape by saying that depsite being in a horny objectifying mood when selecting my avatar, my attitude towards women is otherwise not so… shallow?
But come on, I´m guessing we´d agree that when someone - male or female - meets someone of the opposite sex (unless they´re gay), one question lingering on their mind is whether they´d “do” them.
If ladyjane is how you describe her, my interest in this thread will seriously drop…
It certainly could!
Or I could call it a more basic: mocking.
I admit, I’m much more attracted to Dan~'s avatar than Standard’s. God bless you Cadbury.
The thought does cross my mind, but only if my mind is totally clear i.e. there is nothing for me to mentally rectify - these terms apply even if the guy is hot, sadly, but the good news is that my mind is nearly always clear 