Is morality subjective or objective?

It can all be explained scientifically…so you are wrong again…You are being embarrassed and you don’t realize it because you are totally unaware and you will continue to be embarrassed.

Well you are not doing any explaining of any kind, instead just keep on repeating your superiority based on nothing but your own beliefs.

And this is not the nursery.
Nobody is being embarrassed by a misplaced idea of superiority based on an ever increasing stack of unfulfilled claims. Except maybe the one making said claims.

You are being embarrassed but you are too unaware to realize it.

Offense is taken. Not given.
But if it makes you feel better thinking that you did, then by all means suit yourself.
Whats one more belief when you have already decided that your beliefs are the one and only truth. Am i rite? :wink:

My beliefs;philsophy and science make sense and work so I know that mainstream science is total BS…so that’ll do me…

2 Likes

Mainstream science claims that everything is a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) and not a representation of reality (non illusion) ProfessorX…if you knew anything at all about representation of reality (non illusion) science then you would know what that means. As you don’t…you remain ignorant.

You exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.So if you claim that you don’t exist then you are a liar that exists…but you don’t possess metaphysical life because you have not been separated from binary.You are absolutely clueless as to what that even means.You don’t interpret binary…you interpret sounds,visions and sensations created from binary.

1 Like

Why do I need to claim that I don’t exist? I never claimed that.

You don’t, but if you do, then you are a liar that exists…as you only exist then you can’t cancel yourself out…so +=- and -=+ philosophy is proven to be false.

1 Like

I wonder why we keep responding to you. Maybe that weird thing about not being able to look away from a train wreck..

1 Like

Your arguments don’t work ProfessorX…your philosophy false.

1 Like

And what argument did I make here that doesn’t work?

You claim to be an illusion rather than a non illusion…claiming that you are an illusion is nonsense because you can’t cancel yourself out because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist…lol!!!

1 Like

You have already canceled yourself Jupiter123, as we have established that you are a liar and you believe that you do not exist.

Go away ghatzige…rather, we already know that you are utterly clueless about everything.

True? @ghatzige what is 1+1?

That is a very interesting question, and I am not joking.

The 1+1 requires certain assumptions prior responding. In science these are well accepted (to the point where nobody questions them), while in philosophy we need to repeat them:

A) The first quantity (1) and the second quantity (again 1) belong to the same set of quantities.

  • 1 apple and 1 apple.
  • 1 chair and 1 chair.
    If the two quantities do not belong to the same set, the summation is void. 1 apple and 1 chair give nothing.

B)When we write “1+1” without further elaboration, we understand abstract 1 and abstract 1, which are assumed to belong to the same set. The abstract summation arises later in the mental development of a human. First the kid learns to sum up similar objects (cats, dogs, flowers etc).

Both assumptions are essential in order to arrive to the final answer “2”. It is just that we have evolved so much as spieces, that these assumptions come automatically to us.

PS: There is an additional assumption, related on how we distribute objects in sets. No apple is exactly the same with another apple and no chair is exactly the same with another chair. We have to decide apriori what constitutes “same” inside a set. This is what is called “pattern recognition”. We identify similarities between objects and we place them to sets.
An apple and an orange give the sum of 2 fruits, once the set “fruits” is defined.

I assume that what you wrote means to some people that you are absolutely clueless about that.

It’s not that you sum the actual apples. If you sum one apple and one chair, you have two things. Now, if you cut the one apple in half, you have three things.

And you created the new set, called “things”.

It requires some level of understanding on how summation works.