Thanks for playing. You have no clue how science works. You probably found the terms you are using here by watching cartoons.
2 Likes
There you go againâŚno defence at all as to why you and your science claim lies.
As attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force ABSOLUTES do not cancel out in the cosmos we now have solid evidence that moral ABSOLUTES exist as well.
I know how representation of reality (non illusionary) science works my friend.
You have just proved to everyone that you are incapable of defending the flaws in your fake philosophy and science.Thankyou.
Well ghatzige didnât want to play for long did heâŚLOL!!!
You just see the people with the most patience answering you. The rest just think what you say unworthy of being payed any attention to. Most people just donât read what you say because you repeat yourself with no regards to the topic - that way, you poison all topics with all ideas that are, at best, tangential to it.
If you care for your thoughts, first sieve them through the lens of âwhat could be wrong?â and correct them with all the criticism you can think of, and see if it matches the topic. If you donât, youâll be ostracized more and more, even when you think you are in the discussion, when people just ignore you
2 Likes
Stop your wingeingâŚand cut to the chaseâŚwhy do you and the scientist that you foolishly believe in claim that attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes cancel out when that is a lie? Provide the science that proves that attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes cancel out. You and the scientists that you foolishly believe in know that you canâtâŚTHIS IS TRUTH!!!
You exist and claim that you are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) âŚwhich is in correctâŚyou exist and are a representation of reality (a non illusion).
You canât cancel yourself out because you need to exist to claim that you donât exist which proves that your +=- and -=+ starting philosophy and the science derived from it is incorrect.
Attractive and Repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes donât cancel out and so moral absolutes exist.
Go and find ghatzige or ProfessorX and play with themâŚtheyâll play along with your psychotic delusions.
I honestly feel like this guy is trolling now.
1 Like
There is a place for productive trolling, much like pointing out the case of the 5 bazillion 7834 conscious teapots⌠but I donât see that. Trolling should be fun
Whatâs up donât you like hearing philosophical and scientific truth âŚ.get used to it.We have to hear your trolling nonsense constantlyâŚ.and we have had 300+ years of mainstream scientific BS and you donât have a problem with that.
I have stated that moral absolutes exist because attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes exist and proved why they existâŚâŚif you and mainstream scientists canât prove how attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes cancel out,and you canât, then there is absolutely no need to prove that moral absolutes existâŚ.just accept that God exists and his moral absolutes exist as well.
It a scientific fact that the metaphysical SELF interprets binary data in the form of sounds,visions and sensations.Itâs a scientific fact that sounds,visions and sensations canât be produced in the cosmos without binary data.Itâs a scientific fact that this binary data is produced from binary electrical digital signals created from varying frequency electromagnetic energy analogue waves which are picked up by the biological machine antenna senses.Itâs a scientist fact that these energy waves are emitted from vibrating matter.Its a scientific fact that all matter is held together because attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes are balanced out by the formula N/S=N/S.Itâs a scientific fact that as force absolutes exist in the cosmos then all evidence suggests that God exists and moral absolutes exist as well.
If mainstream science adopted the correct starting philosophy for representation of reality (non illusionary) science then it would know this.However,it hasnât and has rather chosen to adopt an incorrect starting philosophy for science which can only come up with a misrepresentation of reality (illusionary) science.
2 Likes