Is-Ought: Valid distinction, or false dichotomy?

[Ichthus77 (Ichthus77 (formerly She™))]

Adler said same, but considers it a form of modal fallacy.

Thing is. He & others* conflate values and duties. The right (pious) thing is the right thing whether you value/prioritize (love) it or not.

*One example:

@Ichthus77

In “the humanism of existentialism” Sartre says both, “we can never choose evil. We always choose the good…” (p. 293).

and:
301, 351 352, 355

“he has made himself a coward by his acts” (301)

“my shame is a confession” (351)

“Shame—like pride—is the apprehension of myself as a nature although that very nature escapes me…“ (352)

“I am ashamed of being born or I am astonished at it or I rejoice over it, or in attempting to get rid of my life I affirm that I live and I assume this life is bad. Thus in a certain sense I choose being born,” (355).

Ref: Existentialism/ Basic Writings” 2nd Ed., ed. Guignon/Pereboom, Hackett, 2001.