Surely you jest. I thought you would appreciate the attention. Of course, in a world of uncertainty, how would I know? Of course, I realize you reject empirical information along with everything else. But hey, its all in good fun.
Joker isn’t funny.
He’s a self-destructive Jesus#2, headed towards a deadly idealism of “equality”, instead of affirming the greater powers overcoming the lesser powers in the universe.
Apply “thou shalt not kill” to your microbiology, and you see how suicidal “non-violence” can be.
It’s the weak whom are wasting the most life and the most time.
The strong are clean within, as they destroy all parasites and enemies.
The strong can handle what they take, sometimes even better than the ones whom they took it from.
We could use a static term to describe a dynamic entity but it would ultimately fail. But terms are not static. Nonetheless, their dynamism is different to what we use them to try to describe, though both are dynamic.
Heraclitus SMASH! (sorry, been playing Smash Bros. tonight)
They are already beings. Acribing to them non-descript categories isn’t an issue in a common sense. In that a being can be authentic or inauthentic in an existential sense they can be humerous or not in a social sense.
I knew it!
You may want to stop. Some parents are happy to get the rodent off of their hands but some actually like children.
{Off Topic: Hey, me too! Finally got the Ice Climbers down pat!}