I think so.
???thats nice that you think so, could you elaborate?
I agree.
Golly, reading this made me feel a little less alone in this ILP universe, just for today.
Dominance over a socially repressed, legally deprived and economically shortchanged woman is dominance over an ignorant, woebegone wench. Who wants to dominate anybody anyway? The satisfaction comes in a meeting of minds and a full-blooded relationship with a woman with confidence, who can appeal to one’s mind as well as one’s senses and who is an equal partner in a relationship with direction.
here’s so much naive romanticism in those short phrases that I’m almost embarrassed by them.
Listening to a child speak about their ‘soul mates’ is truly an exercise in self-discipline.
One wants to laugh, at first, then one remembers that this mind votes and by voting affects this …one, and then anger sets in, and then this one calms down and reasons that even stupidity can be adapted to.
In the greatest tragedies lie the greatest opportunities.
Detachment is the key.
I still see the question as vague.
Does the question mean male dominance eventually makes the male have a more femine nature
or does it mean that females lose femininity when subjected to male dominence?
Or does the male dominence cause females to lose feminity by having to struggle to get out from under the dominence.
Does the guilt of dominating females bring about a passive effeminate male?
The OP is very vague because it can be seen as any of the above or more. So it needs to be a little more elaborate, IMO.