Thanks, the same to You and the answer is obvious: The provocateur. Who that is is shrouded in a kind of haze. One side? The other side? NEITHER? Both? Or a third party agency? Facts and at times outcomes or patterns can relight situations by decoding revisions, and revisions of revisions, which are currently in progress.
Or any permutation collusion of the above.
All the fun of the fair… obviously not.
Klaus Schwab is the one who expands the power of the globalists with his knowledge of technology and economics and trains helpers, i.e. leaders and shapers, for this purpose, among other things, in his World Economic Forum. This Klaus Schwab has said once that Putin was his favorite pupil, and Putin has lost praising words also about Klaus Schwab. Now both of them are keeping a low profile with such statements.
In any case, the Ukrainian-Russian war, like almost every war in history, is staged. Don’t you believe it? It is very suitable for interrupting supply chains, similar to the “lockdown” in Shanghai and Shenzhen or even in Hamburg: the ships for export simply do not sail anymore and in this way ensure the absence of certain raw materials and products, i.e. for enormous price increases and in more and more countries for an enormous increase in starvation deaths.
Seems an accurate focus.
This is some paranoid thinking. Just because certain events end up benefitting some groups of peoples DOES NOT prove that these same people must have causes these events…just like the 9/11 kooks who think that just because some sectors of American elite gained on the attack it must therefore prove that they were the ones causing it.
So you mean that the fact that you as Polandyoung are just like Polishyouth is not proven.
Yes, well, it is not 100% proven, but it is proven to a very high percentage (ca. 99.99%) - based on circumstantial evidence!
Shall we go for a trial based on circumstantial evidence?
No. We do not even have to do that.
Behind Polandyoung and Polishyouth is one and the same person.
Also, the fact that you use personal attacks - ad hominems - whenever you have no arguments shows that you are the one behind both Polishyouth and Polandyoung.
No wonder that so many people don’t want to have anything to do with you, even want to ban you and have already banned you in other forums.
The diagram is nonsense.
Japan and China do not go together.
You have not understood. The diagram does not show at all that or whether China and Japan go or do not go together.
It simply shows what relevant powers there exist inside and outside the West. The comparison between the years 2000 and 2020 is also intended to illustrate how much China has grown in power, which should become particularly clear through the comparison with Japan. Those that go together are framed together. China, Japan, India and Russia are not framed together. Whether they go together or not has nothing at all to do with the diagram, as I said before.
Also, it is not clear from the text that or whether China and Japan have anything to do with each other or not. My point is only to show that (1.) the West, while still very powerful, is also divided within itself by the digital-financial complex (framed) on the one side and the national complex (framed) on the other, and that (2.) China’s power has grown. Hence the comparison between 2000, when the digital-financial complex of the West was less powerful than the national complex of the West and China was less powerful than Japan, and 2020, when both relations had long since reversed.
2000:
2020:
In addition to these, there are other interesting aspects, such as the fact that a digital-financial complex has also emerged in China and has been relegated to the scrap heap by the Chinese Communist Party, which is why the digital-financial complex of the West and the Chinese Communist Party have become increasingly close. (I could also go into details here.) To make it short: the most isolated at the moment is the national complex of the West (including its organizations like e.g. NATO, NAFTA, EU) - this is not only shown by the fact, that the World Economic Forum intends to change its domicile from Western Europe to Eastern Asia, but also by the disastrous US sanctions policy against Russia (disastrous, yes, especially for Western Europe).
[tab][youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL2C6HHgxvM[/youtube][/tab]
Your grasp of geopolitics is rubbish.
Japan and Australia are both in the West.
Do you have nothing to say at home?
Or why do you always think you can insult where it can happen anonymously? You are obviously not allowed to do so at home.
No wonder: ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=197361 .
Is it really possible to be SO stupid?
My graphics are not difficult to understand.
2000:
2020:
Ireland and Belgium, for example, are also part of the West and yet not mentioned in my graphics. Northern Trust and Netflix, for example, are also part of the West and yet not mentioned in my graphics. So what? Everybody understands that not all parts of the West can be mentioned here (for space reasons!), but only the most relevant or biggest powers are mentioned. This is what the circles and rectangles are supposed to express. Besides, my graphics say “a.o.”, but you do not seem to understand what “a.O.” means: “and others”. If my graphics would consider every nation, every state, every organization, it would be too big for every ILP page. The graphics must remain clear. Most people understood that at the first glance at my graphics, but you did not.
Japan is not part of the West, but mostly sympathizes with the West, but does not do so because it considers itself a “Western” country. If we only wanted to consider as “Western” a nation, state or organization which decides and acts in the sense of the West, then we would have to count - at least until recently - Saudi Arabia as part of the West, but Saudi Arabia has only done business with the West, especially with the USA, and is therefore far from being a Western state. Just as Japan has not simply become a Western country, as you seem to wish, but has somehow learned to maneuver between the will of the West and its own will against the background of its East Asian tradition. Japan has never been a real part of the West.
That’s right. Europe is once again the loser. And this has already been the case since World War 1.
Will Europe ever wake up?
In any case, the monetary system has huge problems. The digital data system, however, has no problems at all, and that is no wonder, because such a (DIGITAL!) data system has never existed before. It is completely new in history.
Therefore, it is also appropriate that money, which until recently had power almost all to itself, has since shared it with the digital data system. Because the money or assets of the financial system are “cared for” by the data of the digital system.
Klaus Schwab has trained very many people and is very highly regarded in the world of the powerful. Therefore, and for reasons that he gets a lot of money from his trainees and “visitors” for his services, he belongs to the world of the powerful.
Someone - it might have been Klaus Schwab - once said that control over Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been lost, because of ignorance of the algorithms running in the background of AI. 
I guess it was a pretty exciting time for them.
They force every person into their Procrustean bed.
[tab]In his History of the World, the Ancient Greek historian Diodorus (1st century BC) reports the following about the fiend and highwayman Procrustes:
[i]Procrustes offered travelers a bed, but in some sagas he also forced wanderers to lie down on a bed. If they were too big for the bed, he chopped off their feet or excess limbs; if they were too small, he hammered and stretched their limbs apart by stretching them on an anvil.
Procrustes was slain by Theseus on his migration to Athens as the last of the villains at Kephisos.[/i][/tab]
The question, of course, is interesting in itself. Both of the World Wars were started due to tension between central European superstates and Russia over which of the two would have political ascendancy over the states in between. The Russian case has always been that those intervening states are mostly of the same cultural make-up as herself, belonging to the same rough historical continuity which is characterized with close and often bellicose contact with states on the southern and eastern borders of Russia. The central European case has usually been that, in order to compete with the western European superstates, it requires the resources and industrial capacity of these intervening states.
In both WW1 and 2, the central European case took the form of a claim that the cultural make-up of Russia and the disputed states, often simply referred to as Slavic, is inferior and evil, and must be either enslaved, heavily oppressed, or simply eliminated.
The odds are terrible either way to the point of madness.
No one can bet on it now, the tableau needs to be extended indefinitely, resembling the travail of the tortoise’s plan to eventually beat the hare. And that can approach an indefinite - infinite lapse, for the uncertainty feeds it’s self .
Eventually opposites will evolve through patient waiting for a resolved sign , where even the wait for goody as it will change people’s hearts about the fortunes of their conceivable familial progeny.
So dig in get your popped corn and enjoy the show.
It’s mostly bluster from the EU. The sanctions on Russia hurt it more than Russia. They will have to relent. A compromise is likely, but in the end, a Ukraine that was up for grabs will be defined, and more in Russia’s favour than the EU’s.
Eventually, Achilles and the hare are so close that there is no longer a race, and they stop. Nobody can expend energy indefinitely.
Otherwise, I agree with you that the family connections between Ukrainians, Russians and central Europeans will eventually probably help heal the old enmity.
If part of the Ukraine stays with Russia, part joins the EU, and the EU continues in its financial woes, it will become untenable for them to keep Ukrainians and their Russian families or business interests arbitrarily separate, and they will have to open the EU itself to Russia.