The redux to absurdity should have halted here as non-sensible from here on
just triple bettin’
If I says this they’d cart me away
Triple header search. For. ///\
About to go with or without him. Js.
I don’t play games with strangers.
Go fish.
I did, sorry to re port that the pond sinkhole may reveal a special fish, on that is too big and/ or too small, and whisked through and into the pond’s drainage.
But the later is preferable cause the source merges with the ocean of the source.
Maybe fish like dogs and cats can sense danger up ahead?
I double dog dare ya.
So now you gotta.
Even without reading it yes I gotta, read it to verify the above AND can individually prove what comes before: and Socrates was wrongly executed ex-post-facto, one overwhelming grey area is, that Leibniz was correct with infinitables, cause the form of the image was configured by his calculated idea that musical tonality approximates the visible image of the music, Beethoven was deaf yet could imagine the sound that nickeled in to his imagination.
[quote=“Meno_”]
Even without reading it yes I gotta, read it to verify the above AND can individually prove what comes before: and Socrates was wrongly executed ex-post-facto, one overwhelming grey area is, that Leibniz was correct with infinitables, cause the form of the image was configured by his calculated idea that musical tonality approximates the visible image of the music, Beethoven was deaf yet could imagine the sound that nickeled in to his imagination.[/quasi The form of the image of the WORD has established it’s logical superiority over it’s content.
Or, som’thin along those lines.
If You disagree with the above, specifically it makes very little difference, and we can go in to colors from Humboldt? No that is not right but begins with H will immediately look it up asa possible before darkness at midnight>another H - Heller which I do remember, to Witt, get Stein, but me no me on dye it) so will wait, have to!
But if agree u, then what no matter me no no mind.
Didn’t have to look it up it was Koehler, and the suggestion about Witt’s interest on color was proposed as something could be interesting as continuations go, if all is fair and sqare.
OK
The idea which brought the discussion to a halt, as far as my position, limited as it is, was in conjunction to the method by which I could start thinking about light and sound not predicated as if the triad interpretation and the one which appearently preceded it, for that is a pretty general approach to learning on all levels, irrespective of content, where black and white appear primarily as ,fitting into that pattern, as white is all consistent with all colors, of all colors, whereas black merely consumes white.
Were you someone other than I thought you were? Who did I think you were? Who were you?
Are you s. o. t. I. t. y. are? Who do I think you are? Who do you want me to think you were/are? Who are you?
I think the more sensible way to approach color and Wittgenstein’s remark that white is inconceivable as thought as transparent, may introduce the connection between clarity as connecting transcendence, transformation and transcendence, then work the trans as I’ve object as generally gaining and loosing the method, which initially a movement toward light, away from the abysmal judgement by appearances, as Dali was keenly aware of in his metamorphosis of narcissus.
the firm and content in ancient times were not apprehended as if color was part of light, but color was intrinsic within the objects light illuminated.
So maybe the transposition of the triple analysis takes a backseat to the sequence of learning pertaining to the similar calculus of learning discussed anime with reference to Leibniz. And Beethoven
That’s the point who I am or anybody is changes the past person from a present situation but only necessarily through a doubly exposed filter.
I remember discussing in Dr. Z’s spring course the difference between (my memory sucks, sorry) how we arrive at or put together a concept versus how what the concept represents is put together. Conceptual versus material development which may or may not align with each other. Can’t remember what was under discussion at the time. Pretty sure it was also discussed in other classes in different words.
Keep your secrets.