As an aside, the Zionists could have just as easily decided to call the country ‘Palestine’. Or anything for that matter. What would the pallyshaggers be chanting then, and what would the ‘palastainians’ be calling themselves today? ‘Free Israel’, and ‘Israelis’? 
There is no such thing as ‘gender’ dear, so no. That’s not something I have ever given a microsecond of thought to.
Yes, There is no such country as ‘Palestine’.
157 countries disagree with you.
1 Like
‘Palestinians’ only started calling themselves that in the late 1960s, under Yassar Arafat (an Egyptian). Before that it referred to both Jews and Arabs living in the region. In fact it applied more to Jews by Arabs because it was considered derogatory.
It’s a political term, not an ethnicity.
Did I say it was an ethnicity?
You seem confused again.
1 Like
And yes, the names of countries are “political terms”, almost by definition.
1 Like
Wow. No such thing as gender. No such thing as Palestine. Just wow… Can’t even.
Is this X or a philosophy boards?
What gender and sex is AIS? Tell me that why don’t you.
Why does that dipshit keep ‘tagging’ my posts yet has me on ‘ignore’? Hmm. Such a ‘gifted’ individual 
Trump’s text message to the Prime Minister of Norway. At least he can spell ‘Nobel’ now
Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.
Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway?
There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago , but we had boats landing there, also.
I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States.
The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.
Thank you! President DJT.
We know that the Vikings were in America before the European settlers, perhaps Denmark has a right to America! At least you’d get healthcare!
2 Likes
You don’t even have an argument, congratulations.
There are always alternatives …
The warmonger who wants the peace prize …
A new world order is emerging….one totally different from the one originally promoted by America…which only signified a world order dominated by the US and its elites.
Trump is accelerating multipolarity.
An age of the SuperState is developing.
The US is no longer a global hegemony, but is becoming a regional power.
1 Like
I don’t know that Trump knows what he’s doing half the time. He seems very reactive and egotistical, traits that can look like confidence or strength to some people, but don’t necessarily translate into good leadership. Apparently.
1 Like
As someone who will not live past 2060ish and for the rest of his days live as an outcast and/or criminal, i only concern myself with the immediate pragmatic value of a president… what i can get out of em.
Trump is a mixed bag. His healthcare policies don’t affect me because if i get sick, i simply go to an emergency room that can’t deny me and then refuse to pay. Having insurance or not doesn’t matter to me. And i can take advantage of the fact that nobody will rent to me and that i never have a steady, predictable income (due to not being able to advertise properly) to justify not needing good credit… so unpaid medical bills and bad credit aren’t a problem.
The tariffs are killing me, and the federal government’s continued refusal to legalize marijuana. I smoke at least $150 a week in erb because of the THCa hoax. If erb were legal, i would spend less than half of that and be twice as high.
The ICE stuff has an indirect advantage; it may remove illegal carpenters from my watering hole and reduce my competition.
I would say that the international theater of conflict the Don creates is also a good thing for me, but in reality, it has no real effect. Conflicts that occupy the time and energy of law enforcement are generally to my advantage because they take the eyes off me. But this is only effective very locally, so international conflict is irrelevant. What i would benefit from would be a local shortage of city POleece and/or a high crime rate in whatever area I’m in. So the Don’s international activity doesn’t matter to me.
His enthusiasm for crypto is to my advantage.
The final advantage of having the Don as prez is the controversy surrounding his scruples. His crude and volatile character helps corrode the American value system and causes people to lose trust, to become enraged (LGBTQ, etc), to engage in violence and revolt here and there. The overall destabilizing effect is an advantage to me. Any kind of ruckus is good. It makes me less visible.
However, the opposite side of that coin, if it were to land there, is very bad; conflicts result in martial law and I’m forced to dissappear from the grid entirely rather than remain safely inside it operating as a ghost (in their machine).
A president is food to me. The contents of his pockets and his policies that effect me immediately… that’s all i care about. In a hypothetical world, for instance, i would have no qualms about executing the Don for the content of his billfold. Even if i couldn’t use his plastic and found only an emergency twenty folded up behind the fam pics I’d still shoot em. This is nothing personal and purely pragmatic.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.