Wyld tends to be militantly wrong about everything, and think certainly Hillary will win.
Does this mean Trump will win?
Trump is presently losing pretty bad, so…no?
Not in Ohio or Pa… I’ve not found many Hillary supporters.
Only 4 news agencies are consistently running the bizarre anti-trump bias to make up for Hillary’s performance at the DNC. I think it was a major tactical mistake to do it this soon, would of had much more impact after the last debate, a media blitz getting her cronies to back her.
They even changed one pulling house current and past polls to make it look she was winning.
Fundamental difficulty is, this forces a lot of scared people who wouldn’t if otherwise of supported trump financially into giving financial contributions, and all her leads on very stupid shit, like “Trump wants to change debate schedule” like Hillary is winning some triumph, immediately collapses once Trump breaks her during a debate… she is being constantly coached to provoke him, but she snaps just as easily under duress… but trump rhetorically recovers much, much faster. I really can’t see her winning in a debate, and several months from now people will be immune to the fake media blitz. Some polls still show it being tight, others increasingly outrageous. It isn’t making sense scientifically but tactically, duh… tell everyone she is suddenly out of the blue winning (and it truely was out of the blue, no real scandel to point to) and you will get people who just want to vote for the winner (a reaction I despise, anyside, btw… shows such voters dont deserve to vote if their only desire is to side with the winner).
She really, really shoukd of waited till after the debates, on purely strateguc grounds, if she was going to do this. I’m talking as if I was a democratic strategist… cause weve seen long term scandels break her, and presidential debates cant sensor them. That is what everyone will be asking about and googling post debate… and another media blitz getting NBCNews, BBCAmerica, CNN in lovkstep, posting practically the same heaflines and articles… comming out with Hillary as a smiling fool, like she is on top of everything and is excited wont work, if that is all you did previously from the convention to the debates. You know trump is going to hit very, very hard. He is also gonna throw a shitload of his recent large donations into it all. Only places that matter are the battleground states, nowhere else, and I’m wedged between two… big difference between the media locally on TV, and national radio, and what some of the older media on the national level reports.
I am deeply stumped how she plans to win these areas, ads dont seem targeted to the locals. Elderly people seem to still like her, but they were all democrats life long. Anyone 50 and under really gates the democrats for the great depression, it started here under Bill Clinton. He closed the mills and factories with NAFTA, he started the subprime loan pyramid scheme. The ultimate collapse under Bush started here under Clinton, and too many people have painful memories of it. The depression has been here twice as long than in the rest of the US, and weve officually slipped back into recession in this area several months ago. Hilkary acting like she is wide eyed, high as a kite isnt going to keep people zombified when Trump starts slamming her. This part of the country also supports a strong (not necessarily warhawks, just strong) military.Hillary has some bengazi wrongful death lawsuits just starting. Civil suits of coyrse arent felony, but it will eat away in a worst manner than khan ever could for trump at Hillary, as Hillary will be seen as directly responsible. How is her pant suits and confidence uppers on NBCNews gonna fix that when trump destroys her? A formal apology on her part isnt going to do it… Like she apologized to west virginia for attacking the coal economy… after her husband destroyed the steel economy? We only had two industries here… Steel and Coal. However, we live within quick driving of 60% of the countries population… three states of which are swing states.
I simply am stumped how she plans on carrying on both prior and post debate, looses it effect afterwards when everyone will see her get torn up… and she always does, she has a track record over the years, scandal follows her like a shadow.
Oh, finally found this post.
Damn, I am good.
I love how I explained in early August exactly how the debates and election would go down, and it did.
This is a pretty cool link, it is by the guy who ran one of the very few (two actually) polls out there that had Trump winning. He explains how it all went so very, very wrong for everyone.
What do I need to do to have this stickied at the top of this forum’s page? I said this in early August. I think people over the next few years should be constantly exposed to this, and whenever someone says it was impossible for anyone to see how this one would play out, they merely need to be pointed here.
I kinda wish I could of said this on TV, everyone would of balled out laughing at me, security would throw me out… then sweet revenge as it happens just as I said it would.
I’m serious, sticky it, or put it in the archives. It should be a classic, studied be everyone for years. I got it right, way in advance.
That day, a YouGov poll said Trump was down by 6 points!
today.yougov.com/news/2016/08/0 … -6-9-2016/
This sets the standard for analysis.
Only thing I really wish I could of predicted was Carlos Danger. Damn, I would if been a Olympian God had I predicted that.
Happy to be wrong! It doesn’t happen often. And yeah, the bit about Wyld being proof of such is a good point too if you look at him as representative of your typical journalist.