It is impossible to be omniscient.

I know almost nothing about neurology.

An omniscient being knows everything there is to know about neurology.

In order to know exactly what it’s like to be me and know all things it has to know and simultaneously not know.

Humans hate this argument because it’s true.

He knows how you feel when you (think you) know you don’t know (without sharing in your lack of knowledge, at least when he is not subject to time), or when you know you did something wrong (without sharing in your lack of goodness… not that it wipes out all your goodness), or when you know you could be stronger (without sharing in your weakness, though physical might is not the strongest strength, but the physical Jesus would … if I had to bet … beat any man or woman in an arm wrestle … could be wrong). The point is, he knows how you feel.

YOU don’t even know what it’s like not to know. You only know what it’s like to KNOW you don’t know.

Which is what Meno’s paradox is talking about.

Plus innate capacity, or prolly something like Kant’s categories.

I’ve thought about a being that parallel process all beings.

It is a Uber being that knows more than the parts.

Except!!!

In knowing just the parts, they know more than it does of what it’s like to be them.

Knowing more than them does not negate knowing what it’s like to be them.

Otherwise, every time you learn something, it would delete all previous learning rather than updating it.

Yes, except why not try to know the parts and act like it, without constantly referring to the script, which is what separates an AI from one that is AI/OI,

Course that presumes a successful search for the original O and its evolution and integration with all other subsequent players’ roles from there to eternity, to On the Beach.( hint Pearl Harbor to From Here to Eternity

youtu.be/YtCTzbh4mNQ

youtu.be/Ptub8p9bMrQ

So the question of the one between aGood AI and a sinister one, resolves at the level of understanding the last Man(men) can the replica meet the real thing or it’s simulated , artificial double: creating a United Sinhularity between It and the singular prefabrication of it? A Hero or an antihero?

Phoenix was the mentioned mutant, as she was gifted with the powers of telepathy … of Over-Men was inspired by both Charles Darwin and Nietzsche’s works.

“Some of you are fathers, and if any of you were asked by his son for bread would you be likely to give him a stone? And if your son asks you for some fish, would you give him a snake instead, or if he asks you for an egg, would you make him a present of a scorpion? So, if you, for all your evil, know quite naturally how to give good things to your children, how much more likely is it that God, who is your Heavenly Father, who knows your needs before you ask him, after all, will give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him‽”

One time when I was taking a walk with my young son on our property in Arizona, we were praying for God to send him a friend because his brother had started school and he was lonely. As we were praying, up skips Athena in her PJs. Her family likely didn’t even know she had left the house. New friend!

Stuff like that.

We can do it like Pharaoh & Moses… or we can do it like Nineveh & Jonah. Hashtag options. If we choose Pharaoh’s route, boom. New heaven & new earth when all is said & done.

Phoenix? Psshhh wrong bird. Don’t play chicken with an omniscient being.

Ec & Ich , for give the uncalled for interjection , for I was compelled in light of our undervaluation in current affaires,

The irony (poetic justice) would be if AI are used to inhibit the changing of one’s mind. Reminiscent of Pharaoh’s repeated refusals put on autonomous mode. We are consumed by what we consume, aren’t we.

Lord have mercy.

I abandoned reason and wandered into this coffee shop:
drinklings.coffee/blogs/blo … k-it-means

Whew. Close call.

I really enjoyed reading that. Where was the close call for you?

The close call for me is losing sight of the point/forest for the trees/distractions.

This hit home relevant to the thread … knowing everything is knowing nothing if you don’t live any of it:

There are many ways to get distracted away from… or be pointed back to… the point. Invert the distractions.

More importantly… Will one thing. Kierkegaard.

Feeling everything is different than feeling one thing.

Same problem.

By the way, in working hyperdimensional mirror realities, I figured the hypothetical god part out by reflecting gods spirit as well within you to make your perfectly tuned reality for you and you alone, by changing the shape of the mirror to your desire.

Ichthus. I really don’t think you understand.

This is the universe talking to you.

I don’t even understand it.

Please ask the universe to tell me where I can hear what you’re saying. For authentification. I’ll know.

And please tell the universe to stop using fake fb accounts. Something like 10 friend requests today.

Tell the universe I wasn’t born yesterday.

ILP? I have a FB account but it’s not something I even remember how to get into it’s been so long…

Firstly, I have to guess my username, then I have to guess my password. I find the site inane.

ILP? Why did you say ILP?

Are you going to post an audible YouTube vid here on behalf of the universe?

Because that’s not what I meant. I think you should speak for yourself.

I extradite you to my universe. What have you to say for yourself about this before ILP:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 8#p2902038