To various interpretive challenges, rather unifying them into two realms , which in fact it always was unitary: the fact of the unreconciable branch of irony as others to worry, whether it’s a dialectically progressive method, or one which has hidden aspects that are subdued and unrecognizable vehicles for entertaining the arguments’ descriptors.
A trap that hides the muffled voices of the could have/should have been heard: “ I told you so, now you have only yourselves to bring to account!
I don’t see it as bringing someone to account.
Even if someone doesn’t get punished, teased or brought to account or to confess…
The simplicity is that people who hurt others have retardation.
When I lash out at people…. I’m in a trance. I see them as my tormentors, I don’t take kindly to god people because of the thousands of hell realms I’ve been to. ‘The good all powerful king’. No thank you. I’ve been to hell.
I’ve finally accepted that people are just dumb.
Does it make me feel good? No. It’s still a shit life. I have no peers. Just a sinking loneliness.
All of this…. For what? The one eyed man being a king in the world of the blind? HA! As if.
I’d trade my king hood for a friend any day.
Quite inversive, in-verse.iv’e, yes, as in shakespeare’s reversal, as in Ischthus request to inverse the probability function of medieval verse:
It would go as follows in the possible but improbable world of the horse crying out:
A king, a king my horsedom for a king…
And who knows what’s in their mind, within the crevices of animal fidelity, better than even the dogs for who can ever have thought of a fighting dog, for human causes, where only pit bulls participate to earn a tap on the back in exchange for inhuman wagers? Or taken for a hunt that foxes and bird feathers the species of females to wear ?
No the true animal of burden allegedly by nihilism’s most outbid author to loose any sense over.
It all means something or another in this world of I/thought paradoxically painful duplicity.
Ec says :
“don’t see it as bringing someone to account.
Even if someone doesn’t get punished, teased or brought to account or to confess…
The simplicity is that people who hurt others have retardation.”
meno reaffirms:(reiterates)
Satori is impassable, before all karmic hindrance is wiped off the supposed blank slates of the least reprehensible babe, for the probably knew in advance into what choice circumstance they were heading, for there is no distinction between inner and outer directional accountability, if ‘original guilt’ is not meant to be taken lightly.
How does The Word’s ontogenesis forgive the fact how why when it should have been learned, when it was thought for that reasone and that reason alone?
Meno…
You know how Ichthus prattles on about self=other…
And that’s what brings peace…
I see it differently. My peace came when I had no peers. When I could feel sorry for them that they are just retarded.
Everytime I see them as a peer, I get angry.
Everytime I see the truth, their mental retardation, I become calm.
It’s a trance to believe I have a peer.
I don’t know , well there are peerages and there are peerages, no one comes in or goes out with or without some peer or another, seen or unseen,
I do now realize that some peers may be unrecognized for who and what they are, what they
What upsets you about people meno?
Really think about it.
It’s when you see them as having your capacity and doing what you’d never do.
Because I knew you may know what mean what was not right expedient , timely, but guess that is somewhat true , been here just about the same time you are, so there may be too forward to let out of the bag without tramping marginally…
Truth is what matters. Philosophy is rooted in and as truth-seeking, that’s it.
Anyone who says or acts differently is wrong, and is not doing philosophy.