Jung and Trauma

That’s not necessarily so. All trauma as inherited is absolutely reactive to the attempt to categorize in terms of the intended propensity to simplify trauma to its basic situation.

That primary concern with such action may be inherited, or learned, where the later may overcome the former’s fractured analytic preoccupations, by further occurring but less explosive breaks along the way.

Such fragility may contain reserves of vital energy, which may diminish the use of such conventional wisdom by decontrolling the use of that energy for the use of social fragmentation. Reversely , disarraying for most, to benefit the least.

1 Like

I’m just telling you what I’m listening for, and why.

For example, why do you ask these questions and then manifest disinterest in the answer?

The answer to that one is clearly not egoic. If I attempted to read it egoically, it would make no sense.

But even in cases where the egoic line is coherent, I would block out 90% of the information why, exactly?

Yes, WHY is the key question applicable to both scenarios. Szasz argues with the realpolitik associated with reprogramming , while Jung transcends boundaries , more akin to Laing’s vision.

Freud’s analytical deconstruction can not bridge the gap between the social and personal hangups, which although not exclusive to ego psychology, can not prefigure the dialectic between the ego and the superego as the effecting agent to the splitting Id. Presumable he doesent, because sticking to conventional talking procedures, using ideal representations were non workable.

It’s alleged that he cured himself of idolatry, minimizing the (his) ego’s transference, but does not avail himself to further possible structural regression. Why? That’s the key to the discussion.

Have you got an opinion on why?

An individual’s inherited and cultivated constitution will determine what will traumatize him, to what degree, and its duration.

Sheltering atrophies the psyche…like comfort atrophies the body.

Well what’s interesting here is that oversheltering is very often a sign of sexual abuse. The abusive parents, in an effort to subconsciously “make up” for the horror, but also simply to silence the child, overshelter. There is also that sexual abuse is a private act, the abuser feels even more privacy about it than a normal person does sex. So fostering an oversheltered atmosphere is also just a natural extension of the atmosphere that a pedophile thrives on.

It’s also not illogical, though you didn’t directly say this, to suggest that childhood sexual abuse could find a genetic anchor. If the parents are the perpetrators, which they usually are, then any genes they pass on easily could suggest a propensity for being raped by one’s parents. Problems like this are unfailingly transgenerational. You did it because they did it to you, etc.

On the other hand, genes are only ever part of the story. If a person with the “autism” gene never suffers trauma, probably he never develops autism, or at least completely. Same with every other possible traumatic reaction.

If you haven’t already, you should read Dawkins’ Selfish Gene.

A “gene” is not necessarily a discrete block of code. It is simply whatever combination in whatever order in DNA that can be tied to a given biological phenomenon.

Re: the “multigene effect” mentioned in your article.

You were the one who was oversimplifying. I suspect Dawkins did much the same. Guy is a bit of a fanny, after all.

Maybe if you laid out how instead of randomly posting a link to a article.

I’m on my phone and I have sausage fingers. Best I could do.

Sheltering atrophies…so that events that could have been endured, shatter the psyche.

A muscle that has only experienced ease will break when a heavy mass is forced upon it…whereas a muscle that has gradually built up its strength, through its habituation with mass, will endure a weight that breaks a sheltered fragile man-child.

Modern societies shelter men…so that the slightest hint of nature’s brutality and justices, forces them to flee…accusing anyone who exposes them to ti of being a fascist…

They are indirectly calling nature fascistic, because they cannot imagine any environment other than the regimented sheltering manmade environments that has comfortably numbed them into complacency.

Imagine we could return to the past…Nazis?

Ancient Spartans and the Norse were far worse… Ghenghis Khan was worse than Hitler…

The colonists exterminated almost all of the natives in the Americas…but you never hear about that.

What about the Palestinians?

But we only worship the Holocaust…Holocaustianity…The masters are the top of the victim totem pole.

There are slaves being purchased, at this minute in Libya…that was “liberated” from “totalitarianism” by the benevolent US…

Trauma everywhere…but we pretend ti is not happening…safe in our first-world comforts.

Nature is far worse…brutal, unjust…and indifferent.

The slightest hint of nature and moderns flee traumatized by the mere mentioning…the mere description…

For them the term ‘nature’ evokes imagery of nice parks with lakes…Sanitized nature.

They prefer discussing how things “ought to be”…because they still feel incapable of dealing with reality.

The world is either too much to handle, for some, or not enough…to justify their suffering.

Trauma?

You have no idea what a man can endure, if he must…NECESSITY.

Are you saying that people that develop pathologies from being raped as children are being bitches about it?

Believed.

No…

I’m saying trauma is relative to the individual’s constitution and its cultivation over time.

A transsexual will be traumatized when he goes to buy cigarettes and is misgendered…whereas nobody speaks of the boy who lives in an apartheid state, under a supremacist dogma, treated like an animal all his life, and then has his family slaughtered and his home destroyed.

What about that trauma?

1 Like

Or, since you luv the chosen psychologist and use his jargon…let’s explore Freud’s incestual impulses…

He wanted to have sex with his mother…

What trauma was he dealing with?

I read ‘Logo therapy’ some time ago, and he follows meaning as did those involved with the positive school. Young babies can definitely no able to differentiate mom from himself, so the why of many questions conducing to identity, identification, can’t ever be determined on that level, denied, yes, and that goes a long way from de-particularization of Thou self from the i(eye)

Failing on that platform, reduces his potential to ever see and integrate the big picture.

The generalized oedipal one sure, but beneath that architecture lays the foundation for archeology.

Hellos, changing identity of pa, and eventual disdain for, emanating from jealousy, and a fear of batter models.

All three, for some has a cure, a curative for homosexuality, a conventional yardstick of the times.

Why do you post like this?

Do you try to appear clever?

A clever man simplifies complexity; a simple man complicates the simple.

Homosexuality is not curable.

It is a consequence of sheltering… Compounding unfit mutations manifesting all kinds of psychosomatic issues…one of which is homosexuality…transexuality

Sex is a canary in a civilization’s mineshaft. Indicating dis-ease.

In Freud’s case, his trauma was cultural - his identity exposes a historical context of collective trauma, full of vengeful impulses.

He universalized his own psychosis, so as to make it less shameful.

This is wrong.

A transsexual is, by virtue of being a transsexual, already a traumatized individual. Throwing a hissy fit over imagined slights is part of, not the source of, the pathology.

Just ask any South African from that time or Jewish person from 30’s Germany. The answer is it depends on the individual, but they will all have pathologies, no question.

No…I already think he’s fucked…but they say they are traumatized when they are misgendered…

So fragile.

What about the trauma Germans suffered when their culture was becoming as the US is becoming in our time?

What about the Apache trauma…Their lives were destroyed…their culture erased…ethnically cleansed…

No movies.

No memorials…no museums…no commemorations…

What about the trauma of a 10 year old Semite, in Palestine…his parents dead, his siblings dead or crippled…his home destroyed…and all this after 40 years of apartheid?