Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking.

Philosophy Forums Science, Technology, and Math
1

Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking.

The question is:
Hawking radiation theorizes that black holes do not, in fact,
absorb all radiation absolutely; they give off some return radiation.
How does this radiation escape?

G. Kirchhoff in 1859 thought up - an absolutely black body.
( Kircchoff 's vacuum radiation / Max Laue/ ).
Absolutely black body is imagined body absorbing all
falling radiation on it. Quantum of light which will get this area
practically will not radiate back.
2.
The concept of a black hole, so massive, that even quantum of light can not
to escape from it, was put forward by John Michell in 1783.
3.
It is visible that the Kirchhoff 's model (absolutely black body) and
the Michell’s model (black hole) are identical.
4.
Quantum of light which got into area of
“absolutely black body ” and practically
did not radiate back.
But it is known, that such condition means" thermal death ".
And in Nature it is not observed.
Therefore Max Planck, studying this area, came to a conclusion:
Such condition can change when radiation of quantum of light
having own internal impulse h=Et will take place.
5.
In 1974 S. Hawking came up with theoretical arguments
showing that black holes are not really entirely black:
they can emit radiation.
6.
Now all of us will wait for " new Max Planck ",
who will prove, that
" famous Hawking’s radiation " / A. Sakharov / consists of
quantums of light, which are describe with the formula h=Et.
7.
We have again invented a wheel,
we have again discovered America.

It is interesting for me to know, where the man keeps his brain,
if he does not see, that " absolutely black body " and
" black hole " are identical models?

2

You are playing with words without any meaning. Just because somebody in history used a word or even the correct concept does not mean that they made any sense.

To make sense in physics, You have to have a MATHEMATICALLY CONSISTENT theory that also CORRESPONDS to real world observations.

For black holes, that starts with Einstein’s general relativity.

3

An absolutely black body is a hypothetical body that
completely absorbs all the radiation falling on it.
Physicists said: “No such body can exist.“
2.
Black hole, is a region of space which no radiation
can be run away from it.
3.
The Absolute Zero: T=0K is a region of space
in which the motion of radiation died.
4.
But Planck said that from absolutely black body
a quantum of light can radiate.
5.
But Hawking showed that black holes can emit radiation.
6.
And the quantum theory said that in Vacuum there is
“ virtual motion of particles. “
7.
Maybe absolutely black body and black holes are
Only models of region of Absolute Zero space: T=0K.

4

Only mathematically (logically) consistent formulations of physical constructs are of any consequence in physics.

The language of physics is mathematics, and not common everyday language. When you find fault with the words used to explain the math, you are just playing with words.

Words like black body, absorb/emit, radiation, black hole, space, temperature, Vacuum, motion, particles, light are not meant to be understood in common English dictionary sense. They are stand-ins for underlying mathematical terms. Convenient for loose talk, but nothing more.