Cool story bro, go make some more earthquakes 
Puerile
He was saying more than one thing when he said this (it’s his brand of humor mixed with wit)… but mostly that the only sure thing is beyond fully grasping—it surpasses understanding for the same reason you are the only one who will experience you-ness—and that kind of knowledge isn’t taught by reading a book or word of mouth or a science experiment—it isn’t taught. It just is.
Isness is ontology, not epistemology.
He was basically pulling a Descartes before it was cool to pretend you could actually argue against Descartes.
There, a bread crumb.
I already answered the question. When I answer questions I continue the thread with casual banter. In Ichthus case, cosmic discussions.
The answer is that infinity being itself but never able to reach itself causes self recursive awareness. Everyone must be different in order for existence to not be nothing at all.
Any more mundane questions or jabs at me?
I’ll tell you a story. I was almost nothing in the earth realm. I’m what’s called a pill baby …. My mom was on the pill when I was born. My father wanted me aborted. When the caesarean section was done on my mom, my umbilical cord almost strangled me to death.
By all accounts, my birth was a miracle.
That doesn’t mean much to me anymore.
Beings can travel back in time and abort me.
I listen to the angels everyday. There’s no ego in this, it’s just a matter of fact.
Every morning I wake up, the first thought in my head is … “fuck, who do I have to protect today?” I’m assuming you don’t wake up that way.
You don’t have to protect me, Ec. I’m not a psychopath.
But if I was, … would you be able to protect yourself? That is the question… only you can ask and answer.
The patriarchy has dominated Western civilization for thousands of years, this is why todays shift towards the feminine may appear extreme to some. It’s about correcting an imbalance. Once this is done then maybe a mixed upbringing of the type you suggest might be possible.
Women need spiritual power to rule. Physical power isn’t enough.
I’ve already said on these boards that wished all women to be smarter than all the men.
That wish was granted.
But like wishes, it backfired on me. The person who made the wish was going to be the most intelligent one.
I’m alone here. I accept it.
He’s totally right. He is the smartest man=one.
Two, however. Way smarter than one.
Three is crazy smart.
momentary relapse of reason see…
An semblance of something we thought to be true but isn’t it’s a false narrative given by ourselves. It echos in time, the words of intelligence, but fall short of the ear when heard. What is to say what we believed true was actuality yet not reality?
I want to add here. And Carleas may disagree with me. When I give a logical proof as an answer and people ignore it. I’ll just talk about whatever I want because they’re trolling their own threads.
Sometimes people don’t want answers to their questions. That’s not my fault.
Some of us were already brought up like that, of a mixed upbringing.
.
Many/much of the world, are/is, so behind on a balanced co-parenting of input and influence of their offspring.
There’s physical power (which males have). And spiritual power. Almost every rape goes unreported or unpunished. Both men and women know this. It’s an absolute shitshow what sex dimorphism does to a species.
Then you enter spirit.
Things in spirit are very different than this world.
A woman can make a whole universe to punish her rapist.
I personally know that sex boot camp in high school would destroy sociopathy. That’s only an earthly problem.
But then you have three structural problems of existence to contend with.
Please don’t
Parenting is only a small part of the problem. It’s about how society is structured from the top down.
Are you referring to America, Europe, the West in general, or the world at large?
Why do you sound/come across as an AI bot?
.
What, in your view, is the structural problem of society’s top-down malaise?
Value after evaluation it’s a reprogramming simulation of negatives and positives defining and refining of such material in a fine way it’s so smooth a cradle of knowledgeable know-hows and not knowing how’s’ engineering the world into knowledge not knowing how to fit in it’s cradle. It could prove disastrous maybe downright useless to some more approximate to some more in tune to value it or maybe deal with it.
There’s no knowing that’s the beauty of it all even for us to guess and integrate or adopt such radicalism with such another system and possibility to tolerate or even love it and appreciate it. Perfection for the imperfect… Shapes fitting into a pattern of creationism telling a beautiful story.
I’m referring to the world at large.
The structural problem of society’s top-down malaise often stems from hierarchical power structures that concentrate authority and decision-making in the hands of a few individuals or institutions at the top. This can manifest in various ways across different societal domains, including politics, economics, and social systems.
- Centralization of Power: When power and decision-making authority are concentrated at the top of hierarchical structures, it can lead to a disconnect between those in power and the needs, desires, and experiences of the broader population. Decision-makers may become detached from the realities and concerns of those they are supposed to serve, leading to decisions that prioritize the interests of the few over the well-being of the many.
- Lack of Accountability: In hierarchical systems, accountability often weakens as one moves up the ladder of authority. Those at the top may not face meaningful consequences for their actions, even if those actions have negative repercussions for society as a whole. This lack of accountability can foster corruption, injustice, and a sense of impunity among the ruling elite.
- Limited Diversity of Perspectives: Top-down structures can suppress diverse perspectives and voices, leading to homogeneity in decision-making processes. This lack of diversity can result in policies and practices that fail to address the needs and concerns of marginalized or underrepresented groups within society.
- Inequality and Exploitation: Hierarchical power structures can exacerbate existing inequalities by allowing those at the top to maintain their privilege and control over resources, often at the expense of those lower down the hierarchy. This can perpetuate systems of exploitation and oppression, leading to widespread social injustice and disenfranchisement.
- Resistance to Change: Top-down structures can be resistant to change and innovation, as those in power may have vested interests in maintaining the status quo. This can impede progress and hinder efforts to address pressing societal challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and systemic discrimination.
Addressing the structural problems of top-down malaise requires fostering more inclusive, participatory, and accountable systems of governance and decision-making. This may involve redistributing power more equitably, amplifying diverse voices and perspectives, strengthening mechanisms of accountability, and promoting greater transparency and openness in decision-making processes.
This reminds me of the Gettier problem.
Reminds me of a cult.
My most on-topic reply to the OP… click the down arrow: