The flavor of the day is arbitrary principles, changing the goal post when it suits politics.
Laws are concrete, not arbitrary. The fact that we have to even discuss this is absurd. The law as it stands says an adult is 18 yrs. old. So she was a child.
Men should be taught red-pill knowledge about the nature of women in school, and I am 100% serious about this. If they were, this whole thing would have been avoided.
Instead men are taught nonsense that is complete opposite to truth, like “women’s opinions matter”. So when some retard woman says “kys” a man actually does it.
No man in his right mind would ever listen to a single thing a woman says, much less take it to heart. They exist for making babies and sucking dick, not telling men what to do.
Beyond saying “your sandwich is ready” I don’t see the purpose in educating women how to talk anyways.
One day a child, the next adult. That’s how it works…
I’ve never said manslaughter was the correct sentence, but I do think a some form of a severe sentence is warranted in this case. There are still severe juvenile sentences.
I’ve tried to explain that there is some amount of arbitrariness inherent in law. You have to use it and maintain it to the best effect, with open eyes, so that justice can be attained in more cases than not.
Mean words murder. Mean thoughts murder. A text murders. An email murders. Anything you say repeatedly that someone finds harmful is criminal, worth hefty prison sentences, wasting the courts time, and the peoples money, but you were mean says eye-witnesses who read your mean words and you caused murder by your very words. You want absurd…enjoy.
I said I wasn’t necessarily convinced it was manslaughter, so please stahp mischaracterizing what I said. Said nothing about this being a case of murder.
Should 10 year old adults get gassed or fried for telling their mate to blow his brains out with his Dad’s gun and two weeks later the adult kid does it as directed?