The focus is too much on a black and white conceptualization that things (eg: language) are either used as tools for an alternative solipsism or that they’re inherent (or perspectively, some opposing form). The main fault is that the concept is fluid in that the aforementioned divergence of things being placed into seperate categories is false; rather everything is simply notches on the same perverbial belt that we all use to find that higher calling within ourselves.
Whether or not we’re realizing it, everybody is consciously or subconsciously striving for something and unfortunately we try to pawn it off as “we’re looking for love” or “commitment” or “acceptance” or “connection” or whatever lyrical chants we hear on the radio that tickle our fancy.
It comes down to us wanting to grow. We use the lines “love” and “committment” and “acceptance” (etc.) as a sublime resolution to end all and ultimately result in our happiness. But the trouble with this is that we’re using the antecedent as finish lines rather than building blocks, because like language, we use love and commitment (and all the other ingredients of true happiness) as tools for our growth. When it comes down to it, growth is what we’re all aspiring for; everything else just becomes the roots for how deeply planted and far reaching we ultimately evolve to become…