Is not anger and violence a natural phenomena to be felt?
Yes or no?
Why exactly does society suppress these emotions as if they were a disease to be seperated from the general public in fear that it may spread?
Is feeling the sentiments of anger and violence a disease?
When a fight breaks out in public do we not suppress it with the police?
When a fight breaks out between couples in their homes do we not call the police?
When anger is felt along with violent tendencies are we not told to suppress them in order to act ideally in a civil manner?
Is not the expression of anger and rage forbidden in the workplace and amongst other public institutions?
When people are told to constantly repress their emotions on a daily basis in putting on a fake smile all in the name of some ideal like “civility” for instance one can’t help but to think that they themselves have been caught up in some sort of cult.
What sort of cult? The cult of pacifism.
In the cult of pacifism all forms of hostility are quarantined.
In the cult of pacifism one cannot have a identity of their own but instead must forgo themselves to be assimilated into the super identity of the collective without struggle or fight in that they remain passively submissive at all times in unyielding obedience.
Never embrace your own personal identity and never rebel.
Obey at all costs even if the cost is your own life. Slavery is your freedom and in it takes the form as your own life in chains.
In the cult of pacifism law becomes triage with all forms of hostility represented as the disease.
By the so called graces of modern government and what many call “humane” management of social behavior within all people collectively and according to the fraud that calls itself the intellectual movement effectively all men or women must become pacified.
Effectively we are all supposed to transform ourselves into docile consumers who’s only function is to breed, buy and obey which then our masters definition of this is “progress”.
It is really quite absurd if you think about it…But we are supposed to obey for “humanity’s” sake or atleast that is what the government says.
Well, a pacifist isn’t anymore passive than a collectivist is a collective.
True, pacifism doctrines bid us into stagnancy (when they’re followed). But I also notice you positing that some of a populace would be pacifist and not others (as implied by government, masters, etc). Sure it’s not, to some degree, statism at the wrong end of your gun?
I embrace it too. This is just another example of my threads where I like describing hypocrisy and absurdity in specific details because it gives me the ability to use deconstruction much more clearly.
Unfortunate for me I did not learn about the hypocrisy of this world until a much later age where I learned the hard way through many amounts of great suffering.
