# LGBT are hated for no reason
**URL:** https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962
**Category:** Society, Government, and Economics
**Created:** [March 15, 2026, 10:27am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962 "2026-03-15T10:27:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 4
### Author:  [@pseudoai](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/pseudoai)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 11:58am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/61 "2026-03-17T11:58:55Z")
For sure, it’s impossible for something scientific to give you 100% of cases, neither can it be about the unmeasured. Now, what about what he wrote would be the thing that makes the most sense out of it?
I try to do that always
---
### Author:  [@ProfessorX](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/ProfessorX)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 11:59am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/62 "2026-03-17T11:59:04Z")
That is true, LGBT are way over-represented among pedos.
---
### Author:  [@pseudoai](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/pseudoai)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:06pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/63 "2026-03-17T12:06:42Z")
I think this topic overlaps with a usual fallacy…:
_Most of A being B_ doesn’t entail _most of B being A_. For example, most of the people that run 100 meters in under 10 seconds are black men. That doesn’t mean most black men run 100m in under 10 seconds.
In most reports of rape, men are the perpetrators
In reports of pedophilia, there are more perpetrators that are L+ than in the general population
Now, how would that kind of majorities make sense in being wary of, that’s a good question. Say, not all of pitbulls bite… does it make sense to be wary of pitbulls? I don’t know. How much?
---
### Author:  [@Nausamedu](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Nausamedu)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:22pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/64 "2026-03-17T12:22:59Z")
You know its funny because arguments and posts like these always remind me of Martin Luther King’s famous quote of dreaming of a world where people are not judged by the color of their skin but the contents of their character.
Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Trans
All states, preferences, worst case scenario “identities” for those who have become so shallow that they identify their entire personality by where they like to rub one out, but regardless: All personal preferences. Operative word: Personal.
I like to eat meat. Not my first preference, but there are plenty of good meat dishes out there.
There are most certainly some special needs psychopaths out there who’d hate me for that, but that example is reserved exactly for the same category as those who’d actually hate LGBT people.
Those who’d actually hate you for eating what you like to eat, are simply not functional human beings. They are lost in a mix of either some kind of belief system or simply needing an outlet for why their life sucks so much ass.
No normal, sane human being would hate me for eating meat.
No normal, sane human being would hate you for liking to stuff yourself full with someone else’s meat either.
What do you think, what normal, functioning, sane human being gives an actual f what i like to eat? What you like to do with your genitals? That you are lesbian, gay, bi or trans?
Nobody.
Thats your answer.
Nobody gives even the remotest of f-s what you like to do with your genitals.
Nobody has an interest in it, nobody has an investment in it, nobody has as much as a reason to even consider it.
So then, you could ask: Why is there such a pushback against LGBT people? Why is the perception around them so negative?
And i will tell you what Luther King said: Its the contents of your character.
LGBT in a narrow sense is just personal preference. Attraction. (Worst case:) identity.
Nobody cares about that.
Do you know what they care about?
The broader sense and meaning of LGBT.
The activism.
The knowing of no bounds, ethics, morals, integrity or any of the social pillars aside from freedom.
The targeting of children.
The filling of school libraries with porn.
The demand of affirmation.
Compelling speech and forcing yourself onto others with your bs.
Spitting on everyone’s rights because yours are more special than anyone else’s.
Positive discrimination, protected status and affirmative action.
The idea that if you are truly normal and accepted then you can do anything to anyone.
The intruding into every personal space, facet, fandom, media, entertainment, and claiming it as your own and littering it with your rainbow shit, then telling everyone who MADE that space in the first place that they do not belong there, because nothing speaks inclusion and tolerance like kicking down someone’s door, telling them that you now live there and suggesting that if they dont like it, they can get the fck out.
In the words of Martin Luther King: Its not the color of your skin. Its the contents of your character.
Because that f-ing “community” of yours has 9999999999 problems, but being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Trans, aint one of them.
There are people who LOVE to hide behind being LGBT, who use it as a shield.
Any time someone criticizes what they do, its STRAIGHT deflection to “phobe”, “bigot”, “hater”, “nazi”.
Because god only knows that if someone does not want them to be touching 8 year olds and teaching them how to do a rimjob safely, they clearly must be a homophobe.
As such your title is wrong.
There is no reason to hate anyone for being LGBT.
Yet is untold amounts of reason to hate what LGBT people do and how they act.
And you know whats funny? LGBT people who do not have a completely f-ed character agree with this position 100%.
The LGBT “ideology” has 999999999 problems and being lesbian, gay, bisexual or trans aint one of it.
---
### Author:  [@ProfessorX](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/ProfessorX)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:31pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/65 "2026-03-17T12:31:43Z")
> [@Nausamedu](#):
>
> 
>
> The activism.
A story I am sure every pro-LGBT person thinks is beautiful and inspiring.
---
### Author:  [@Nausamedu](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Nausamedu)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/66 "2026-03-17T12:58:35Z")
> [@ProfessorX](#):
>
> A story I am sure every pro-LGBT person thinks is beautiful and inspiring.
Case and point.
Even LGBT people with intact values and character condemn this kind of stuff.
There is a long standing disconnect between what LGBT means as a narrow definition and concept, and the utter disease that is the wider community and borderline ideology that hides behind the name LGBT.
Nobody hates LGBT people just on the principle of them being LGBT.
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 1:04pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/67 "2026-03-17T13:04:42Z")
“Like it’s moronic to want a peer reviewed study before we accept a claim like that.”
I wouldn’t say it’s moronic. I would say that I would be more impressed by an engagement with the arguments made, and that might warrant some scientific literature.
As it is, it would be like quoting cutting edge math papers to convince someone that engineering helps improve lives.
This, of course, being the other reason sexual crime is underreported. Even if the survivor penetrates the psychic haze and makes a stand, everybody else hasn’t. Whoever hasn‘t will be subconsciously invested in burrying it. Most people have more fear of shaking the boat than exposing their own kin to the worst kind of violence.
Say something cogent and astute about any of the arguments made. I will gladly quote professional students of the subject.
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 1:08pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/68 "2026-03-17T13:08:04Z")
To other points made: one does not need statistics for sources of malaria to know it is transmitted by mosquitoes 100% of the time. One need simply know the mechanics of the disease.
No?
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 1:10pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/69 "2026-03-17T13:10:59Z")
Now, next question: what percentage of criminals, in general, have no traumatic history?
The question was why they are hated. The answer is obvious.
---
### Author:  [@greenfuse](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/greenfuse)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 1:30pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/70 "2026-03-17T13:30:30Z")
> [@Mary-Poppins](#):
>
> I wouldn’t say it’s moronic. I would say that I would be more impressed by an engagement with the arguments made, and that might warrant some scientific literature.
You didn’t mount an argument, you made a series of claims.
As far as mosquitoes the minor problem is that you can get it through transfusions and sharing needles, contamination operations. But sure that one is nearly 100%.
The other problem with this argument is that is as if human behavior (such as deviations from the norm in sexual activity) is a simple vector like that diseases viral transmission. You know the false analogy fallacy. Why that virus and not the common cold with all of its vectors? Or Ebola.
The problem is you simply claimed the mechanics. Whereas current research points at a variety of factors, including many cases where no sexual abuse has been found.
Why should we believe you claims? How do you know the only cause? Intuition?
So, basically what you are doing is saying: we know the mechanism and amazingly it is sexual abuse is the cause. So it ends up being circular. Unfortunately research seems to show a variety of causes.
You might want to define perversity also.
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 1:44pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/71 "2026-03-17T13:44:48Z")
Ah, well, if your question was whether to believe me or not, I would be powerleas to help.
I speak for people with intellects that dispense with belief altogether.
That does clear some things up, however.
---
### Author:  [@Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Flannel_Jesus)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 2:13pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/72 "2026-03-17T14:13:31Z")
> [@Mary-Poppins](#):
>
> I would say that I would be more impressed by an engagement with the arguments made
There’s no arguments, it’s either true or it’s false. No amount of words are going to make it true, it’s a claim that would be believed from evidence. You can sit there in an armchair and philosophize about what you think gay people are, but making claims like that … they have nothing to do with your detached philosophizing, if they’re true then they can be supported by studies and research, not by philosophizing from a distance.
Your claim was that 100% of sexual perversion (you’re including homosexuality in this) is caused by childhood sexual abuse. Arguments don’t matter. This needs to be supported by evidence. If there’s no evidence, you’re speaking out of your ass. Arguments are moot here.
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 2:59pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/73 "2026-03-17T14:59:01Z")
Well, there were arguments, and evidence was presented.
Maybe you didn’t enjoy them.
More interesting here is the emotional content of the reaction. Emotional, categorical denial.
Does that sound familiar?
Only the ego can make cogent, astute observations. Where a person proceeds from the id, the thoughts that can be formulated become very basic, and emotions are the controlling factor.
---
### Author:  [@pseudoai](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/pseudoai)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 3:13pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/74 "2026-03-17T15:13:46Z")
> [@Mary-Poppins](#):
>
> Emotional, categorical denial.
That was not the response
---
### Author:  [@Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Flannel_Jesus)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 3:43pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/75 "2026-03-17T15:43:15Z")
> [@Mary-Poppins](#):
>
> Well, there were arguments, and evidence was presented
Perhaps I missed it. What’s the evidence that “100% of sexual perversion (you’re including homosexuality in this) is caused by childhood sexual abuse”? I must have missed a link to a study or something that you provided. If so, my mistake. Please humor me and link to the study again.
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 3:53pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/76 "2026-03-17T15:53:11Z")
I sincerely believe that if I gave you perfect knowledge direct from God, complete with a full illustration, it would make no difference
I won’t ask for you to look back and humor _me_ by engaging any of the arguments or evidence presented. It would be a complete waste of both of our time.
Perhaps a different approach might be more interesting. Are you, yourself, a homosexual?
---
### Author:  [@Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Flannel_Jesus)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 4:10pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/77 "2026-03-17T16:10:39Z")
> [@Mary-Poppins](#):
>
> I sincerely believe that if I gave you perfect knowledge direct from God, complete with a full illustration, it would make no difference
You haven’t even tried to do the bare minimum yet, let’s not leap to “perfect knowledge direct from god” if you have’nt even tried the bare minimum.
---
### Author:  [@Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Flannel_Jesus)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 4:15pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/78 "2026-03-17T16:15:33Z")
There’s only two possible reasons to believe all homosexuals suffered abuse as children.
Either (a) you read it in a peer reviewed, reliable study, in which case fair enough, please link us to it, or
(b) you made it up, or are just regurgitating something you heard from someone else who made it up.
It’s clearly not (a).
---
### Author:  [@Mary-Poppins](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Mary-Poppins)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 4:20pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/79 "2026-03-17T16:20:41Z")
I thought we agreed that we would be wasting each other’s time discussing it on a theoretical level. You are ungappy with my standards, I am unhappy with yours.
You didn’t answer my question. Are you, youserlf, a homosexual?
---
### Author:  [@pseudoai](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/pseudoai)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 4:27pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962/80 "2026-03-17T16:27:33Z")
I’m a gappy homosexual, for all intents and purposes. Now, what does that make about the things I write, tho?
[Previous page](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962.md?page=3)
[Next page](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/lgbt-are-hated-for-no-reason/84962.md?page=5)