I still have no idea what you think. You made some sort of connection between the Hitler haired lady and why some people hate some other people. What’s the nature of that connection? Nobody but you knows. Just say what the connection is.
1 Like
It would be insulting you to explain it in any more depth. I just don’t believe you are that thick. So you don’t get it. I’m sure others do. Get over it. Move on. It’s not my problem.
I wouldn’t be insulted. You insinuated it’s not a coincidence that her haircut is Hitler esque. Why is it not a coincidence? Can you explain that? And what that has to do with people hating LGBT?
You are full of shit. You claimed before that you didn’t know who the comedian was when I clearly called him a MAN. Now you are carefully saying ‘this person’ in case you ‘misgender’ HER. If you are that interested go and find the videos of HER yourself.
I never said ‘gay people’. That’s not the thread title.
Are you trying to goad me into saying something you can ban me for? Go ahead. It would be the forum’s loss, not mine.
Oh, I see you’ve hastily changed your comment from ‘gay people’ to LGBT. So you’ve answered your own disingenous ‘question’ then. Good. That’s sorted then.
gay people are part of lgbt… And i didn’t ‘hastily change’ any comment. Changed comments have little edit icons over them, like yours. You seem angry. Find a way to calm down, it will be good for you.
And no, I’m not trying to goad you into saying something i can ban you for. People have had and continue to have some pretty terrible views in here, they don’t get banned. Your biggest problem isn’t the views you hold, it’s how impossible you are to talk to. You talk in riddles and them blame other people for not knowing what you’re trying to say. You constantly insult anybody who disagrees with you. That’s the most likely thing that’s going to get you banned, not the things you believe.
Hell, I wish you’d talk MORE about the things you believe, instead of hiding them behind a nasty veneer of sarcasm all the time. That would be refreshing. Some actual sincerity.
1 Like
FYI dear, this is the full ‘acronym’:
LGBTQQIPPAA2S+ Some people want to add Z and M. I will leave that to your imaginatiion. Besides, the ‘+’ takes care of everything else that’s limited only by your imagination.
L - Lesbian
G - Gay
B - Bisexual
T - Transgender
Q - Queer
Q - Questioning
I - Intersex
P - Pansexual
P- Polycule
2S - Two-Spirit
A - Asexual
A - Allies
Plus - Everything else you can think of.
What do you mean ‘what I believe’? I don’t ‘believe’ anything.
Now which part of the acronym are you referring to?
You did change it. The edited icon doesn’t show up if it’s under five minutes. Why would I make that up? You went from ‘homosexuals’ at the beginning of this ridiculous exchange, to ‘gay people’ to FINALLY the acronym.
How can you say I talk in riddles? That’s ridiculous. And yes, ‘homosexuals’ are part of the acronym, but so are a hell of a lot of other people. In fact the entire human race is encompassed in it.
If you’ve never noticed, this is a common m.o. here among certain types. Pretending to not know what they know. It is one way to avoid facing the cognitive dissonance under the surface of their mind when it comes to certain issues they otherwise want to be interested in, but only up to a point (of validating what they already (have been programed to) think).
If you can’t deal with the frustration of interacting with that it’s easy enough to simply ignore or not respond. Although from time to time it’s always fun to put someone in their place, intellectually-philosophically speaking of course. Remembering too that our posts here are not only for the person we are responding to in a topic but for everyone else who will inevitably also read what we said.
Your original point is still correct, there are lots of “LGB” people who really do not like the ever-expanding list of acronyms for what are largely made-up terms and have nothing to do with actual sexual orientation. “Transgender” has to do with self-identity around biological sex and gender norms/expressions, notwithstanding the narcissism and dysphoria of course, and isn’t about who you are attracted to. LGB are all about sexual orientation i.e. who you are attracted to. Adding the “T” onto that is just silly. Along with the litany of other weird made-up nonsense that no one can even keep track of but somehow we are supposed to bend over or bow down in worship to never ever criticize or question.
It is ever-expanding because they mean anyone who isn’t straight. It’s a group based on exclusion. But the dissonance would be very obvious in, for example, that sign - a group based on exclusion claiming for being inclusive
1 Like
Oh my god! They’ve left out the 2S and the all important ‘+’! They are LITERALLY committing genocide!
1 Like
Better cancel blacklist and deplatform them with public mass shaming and doxxing to ensure these right wing nazi evil asshole Hitler biggot trash never do it again!
1 Like
That’s what an advocate does, silly billy. I remember there was a young beautiful British female lawyer who died from drinking moonshine (bottled as a retail brand) in Laos. I had half a mind to crowdfund the defence lawyers in the case, to get the hostel owners off, at worst maybe 6 x 2-week jail sentences running concurrently suspended for 18 months. Honouring her profession like that is the send-off she’d have wanted. Yes l had a bad experience, a lawyer blatantly lied in a trial where l held all the cards and l won £hundreds instead of £thousands and missed the last train out of town. [I self represented, the defendant got himself a barrister, the defendant forgot to spell his own name correctly on the papers and still l only won £hundreds, the entire defence should have been jailed]
So Canada’s ‘loving embrace’ of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusivity’ only extends to men-in-frocks and muslims. Everyone else, especially women, can go fuck themselves.
You also say that bisexuals are ugly, earlier in this thread. I used to hang out with a mixed bunch of bi people, and straight people at college. Regardless of my views on all that, truth be told, we were all good looking. I think l know the clique you’d have been in in those days, the plain-Jane types that already have developed deep hate
@Florence At least ‘tag’ who you are replying to you imbecile. I’ve never called ‘bisexuals’ ‘ugly’. That would be silly.
It might be ‘just what defence lawyers do’ but why isn’t the prosecution objecting on the grounds that it’s irrelevant?
I am a man. And it’s hard to trawl through your posts when you’ve been iggied for 6 months, as l’m sure you can from today appreciate now that you iggied me too. But it was either you or WannabeProfessor that said it - in wich case sorry, not sorry. Anyway, l’m against LGBT but to me its risible that you are on their case 24/7. Jelly that they have more fun than you? I’m leaving this thread now. Peace 
Crime of passion could mean not premeditated. Google is a killer app.