Hi Zak
Yeah, I read, ‘Zen and the Art…’ many a long year ago, and was impressed: I think it’s what you might call cult reading, no? It spawned a whole lot of other similarly titled works – or was it itself spawned by some similar sounding work, ‘Zen and the Art of Archery…’ or is that just my confused brain?
I came across, ‘Lila,’ quite by accident in a second-hand bookshop. The complete title of the book is, ‘Lila: An Inquiry into Morals,’ and, according to Pirsig’s own blurb: ‘Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance was like a first child. Maybe that will always be the best-loved one. But this second child is the bright one. I think a lot of people will argue with some of the ideas in Lila. There may be controversy. But if people are still reading these two books a hundred years from now, I predict Lila will be the one they consider the more important’.
I can’t recall if Lila discusses classic thinking and romantic thinking: it sounds familiar, but then art generally has been examined, what, since the nineteenth century, under the microscope in terms of its Apollonian and/or Dionysian aspects, even extended as paradigms?
Lila looks into the condition of the modern American psyche, exalting the role of the Native American Indian in the formation of the American identity. There’s a good deal of argument about anthropology and the basis of science, about metaphysics and Quality, with a capital Q, i.e., excellence, as the ultimate reality.
A short quotation, ‘The problems of free will versus determinism, of the relation of mind to matter, of the discontinuity of matter at the sub-atomic level, of the apparent purposelessness of the universe and the life within it are all monster platypi created by the subject-object metaphysics.’
There’s more, much of it. He proposes a whole new epistemology that overcomes all the hitherto insoluble problems encountered in philosophy and the sciences.
Interesting stuff!
peter