not sure if this has any relevanceā¦but existence itself is circular 
God bless
-hth
Well, if by that you mean we come from nothingness only to return to it again for eternity, thatās true.
But then that greatly disturbs many people. So, among other things, they invents God to make those feelings go away.
It doesnāt work that way for me though because I cannot just believe in something without empirical or analytical arguments that might make it seem reasonable to believe it.
wellā¦i am actually a believer
if i understand you correctly i believe you are incorrectā¦one can always put themself in anotherās shoes and try to understand where he is coming from and what he meansā¦the inability of one to do that could simply be considered stubborness for simplicityās sake but that does not mean if one person is stubborn that the other person is stubborn as wellā¦for instance i could have countless arguments with a stubborn person but that does not mean that i am stubborn and am not willing to try and understand the other person just because that person is stubborn and not willing to try and understand meā¦his negativeness can only reflect on me so much as i allow it toā¦and then you could also have two people that are both willing to try and understand the other personās thinking and usually it leads to learning on both sides (but it doesnt change the fact that one could be completely right over the other 
)
Well, I donāt see the point of going around and around in that circle. Letās just agree to disagree.
in practical terms resolving moral disputes in the absence of an absolute or objective ethical standard is a matter of persuasion - it IS possible, and it happens, but slowly over time as social consensus builds and evolves