Linguistic Deceit

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

Imagine we approached many qualifiers as a typical nihilist approached the definition of ‘freedom.’
Imagine, for example, we demanded that power’ or ‘strength’ be given a Platinic Ideal definition, and we claimed that any and all experiences f poser & strength were illusory because they could not attain our - conventional - definitions of power as being nothing less than ‘omnipotence.’

Could we they not, then, claim that we are all “equally weak” or “equally powerless.”
A collectivist’s dream.

And, what if we expanded our methodology and then gave the concept of ‘life’ a similar Platonic treatment, declaring anything that is not ‘immortal’ - complete, perfect, life - is but a shadow of life…an “illusion.”
Could we not, then, claim that life, as we experience it, is but an illusion, and that we are all “equally dead”?

2

The possibilities are endless if we simply ignore the sensorially experienced and we begin with a definition of words, representing concepts.
Like the imbecile who wanted to maintain human parity, and claim that the differences we see, between races, is all “superficial”…illusory"…false…a meaningless cosmetic difference.
Such cowards would not apply these tactics across the board, but only where they want to preserve their lies.
Such a retarded charlatan would simply declare that human evolution began and ended in Sub-Saharan Africa…and that all diverge, since then, was superficial… only affecting the body, not the brain.

And that this convenient rule, only applied to one species.

All because such a self-decieving coward, wanted to preserve the lies he was force-fed, from birth, and filled him with comforting pleasure.

Such a charlatan would then declare that IQ was entirely social…and had nothing to do with environmental factors, like adversity.
Essentially, affirming his liberal delusion that racial and sexual differences were socially determined.

Despite the absence of any civilizations in certain parts of the world, ignoring racial differences in academic and athletic performances, across decades…
Such a cowardly hypocrite, wants to maintain the delusion of tabula rasa…that man is ideologically malleable…that nurturing is paramount…
That nature’s “injustices” are correctable with “proper human social engineering.”

Straight from the bible…concealed in modern/postmodern metaphysics.

Isn’t metaphysics where charlatans ground their self-serving delusions?
Metaphysics completely detached from physics… where they can project whatever feels good to them…whatever validates their utopian ideals.

3

Nihilism, as I’ve said… is entirely linguistic - semiotic.

Its method is not complex.

Use word definition to detach from the act, from the experienced world.
Sell such comforting detachments to the masses…making them conventional.
Affirm them by referring and deferring to texts, or emotions.
Make subjectivity something to be proud of. A universal objective.
Denounce objectivity as the source of all ‘evil.’…source of all suffering…of all injustices.

Create mutually supportive intersubjective collectives.

Create solipsistic loops, where words refer to other words, and conveniently avoid all references to perceptible actions.
For example…when defining ‘will’ do not use the term to refer to the act, but to a definition in text.
Start with the metaphysical and then adjust perceptions of the physical to agree with what has already been determined.

Make the criteria of evaluating validity selectively stringent.
When it suits them, their criteria are lax…but when it doesn’t then their criteria become supernatural…nothing could ever attain them, so nothing can threaten their delusions.

See how they’ve defined ‘free-will.’
Have they demanded similar levels of supernatural evidence when considering the concept of a strong-will?

4

Quotation-Stephen-Hawking-I-have-noticed-even-people-who-claim-everything-is-predestined-12-67-33
Quotation-Stephen-Hawking-I-have-noticed-even-people-who-claim-everything-is-predestined-12-67-331200×640 74.6 KB

Self-deciet expose itself in self-cotnradictions.
Nihilists must contradict their won convictions, in order to survive in a world they selectively, or completely deny.

So, whist they deny any degree of agency, they behave as if they did have agency.
Not only in their daily actions, but when they find scapegoats to blame for their fate:
Objectivists…Capitalists…Nazis…

So, while they absolve themselves, and their own, of culpability, they cannot help but maintain those who they must accuse for whatever happens to them.

They can do without an authoritarian, totalitarian God, of the Jews, but they cannot do without a Messiah, a saviour…a scapegoat.
In a no-god world, they still need crutch.

So, instead of a totalitarian authoritarian willful god, of laws, they believe ni a totalitarian authoritarian cosmos of natural laws.
Absolute Divinity replaced by Absolute Order.

They no longer need the primordial sin, and all that stuff about Adam & Eve and Paradise lost.
In their worldview, there is no guilt, no shame…because nobody can ever break the laws… what has been determined.

Whatever comes to be is in accordance with the LAW.
Paedophilia, necrophilia, mass exterminations, as in Palestine…all according to what has been determined.
No shame. No guilt.
Nothing could have turned out differently.

So, while they repeat the Holocaust, and always recall the Nazis, they have little to nothing to say about the ethnic cleansing happening during their own lifetime.
They prefer discussing ‘free-will’ or the ‘meaning of life’ - indulging in word games - but have zero to say about a holocaust occurring during their lifetime.
That is determiend…but the one of WWII…they’ve been told, was the only one that mattered…that can ever matter.
In the latter, the Nazis did have agency… presumably.
They, and only they, could have chosen to do other than what they, presumably, did.

5

While flat earth is an example of a perceptual illusion - more of a perspective effect - … the roundness of the earth, from space, is, somehow, not.

While a will’s freedom is illusory, a will’s strength, beauty, power, somehow, is not.
What about a will’s existence? Is it an illusion?
Seems to not have any advantage, so why did it even emerge and how did it develop?

While evolution changed the human body, creating a multiplicity of racial differences, it somehow had no effect on the human brain.
The human brain, for over 80 000 years, remained immune, just at the human body changed to produce the racial types we can all recognize.

6

The thing is that, far from re-empowering relative power or revitalizing relative life, the “death of God” reinforces our weakness and ephemerality! For if there were such a God, we could at least enjoy true power and existence vicariously…

The only way out would lie in completely forgetting Plato and all his footnotists. But precisely that would make their historical recurrence more likely.

7

Self-awareness necessitates scapegoats to be unburdened.
Civilization would be impossible without such deceptions.

8

It’s interesting, from a psychological perspective, that those who deny ‘free-will’ are the ones who insist that there can only be “one, true way”…the determined way, while those who believe the will is as free as its powers allow - like I do - claim that there are a multitude of ways, and perspectives and all of them participate in determining the consequences - natural selection.

These cowardly cunts, are convinced they are anti-auhtoritarian, anti-totalitarian, when their entire worldview is totalitarian, missing the god authority.
All they’ve overcome is the ‘god’ concept…as it was given to them by the Jews… their adopted Abrahamic definition of god.
They got it from others, like Zoroastrians, and ancient-Egyptians, and every host culture they came in contact with and were evicted from, because they invent nothing. they plagiarize and corrupt.

From this totalitarian definition of god, they receive their understanding of morality.
They can comprehend no other definition… accusing it of being imposed upon them, just as their understanding of ‘god’ and ‘morality’ was imposed upon them…as was their rebellion, their method of nullifying this past imposition.

They have no way of basing their definitions in independent actions…
In their fucked-up psyche everything is a human contrivance.
Created out of ‘nothing and nowhere’ like the god of their youth ‘created existence’ out of nowhere and nothing.
Their brains are contained in this superstition, and they cannot break out of it.

The ensuing dissonance of what they think and what they do, they ascribe to some kind of intellectual “fragmentation”… unable to comprehend how a mind can simultaneously hold two, or more, contradictory beliefs and standards, unable to consolidate and formulate a cohesive, harmonious, whole out of this psychotic mess.
They think this is normal.

All their beliefs based on texts, proposing abstractions, they then denounce as deceptive.
And yet, they CHOOSE, not to change their methods… sensing that this would expose them to possibilities they cannot psychologically endure.

9

On the victim hierarchy innocence is crucial.

ALL victims are innocent…not guilty, not responsible,…
How can they preserve their innocence without a scapegoat…a messiah to save them from their own culpability.

They need a saviour, someone that will take their guilt away.
They need something or someone to blame, for everything they’ve done, in the past, or will do in the future.

They don’t like authorities, especially if they are tangible, real…but they cannot cope without their missing scapegoats…Jesus…God.
This is why I call them ‘recovering Abrahamic’ and not recovered.

They claim to be atheists but they need the scapegoat messiah.
They can live without a parental god, but not without a scapegoat saviour.

What did Jesus do?
He took on their “sins”…meaning he became the one who could be blamed for everything hid followers did or will do.

This is why they deny free-will.
They must remain innocent.
They must remain shameless, guiltless…
Worthy of salvation.

God, of Abraham, is replaced by a nebulous cosmic order, no less absolute and totalitarian…
It becomes their new scapegoat.

Creation becomes determination.

10

Just think of the possibilities.
How may “evil” concepts we can nullify by defining them out of existence, as we did with free-will.
How many things we can declare “illusions.”

The magical power of words and…popular use - conventions.
Collectives.

God has been replaced by humanity.
Humanity can now use logos - language - to define specific concepts out of existence.
Race/Ethnicity…sex/gender…free-will…inequality…mortality itself.
All with the use of words…
Power of words.

11

DO you think anyone reads this stuff?

12

Yes.
Don’t use yourself as an example.

You’re more like forum filler.
Another troll going from thread to thread trying to be noticed, with self-contradicting sarcastic quips.

13

innocence is one of those things that has a way with culture.
Weak, timid, vulnerable, pure, etc. The weakness of youth.
If they are suddenly destroyed, via their weaknesses,
it is considered evil.

It’s kindof complicated, how twisted and mutated a culture can be.
What was once noble, is now evil.

14

Yes…

But nothing born is ever innocent.
It subsists by killing and consuming other life.
Its culpubility growing over time.

This is the source of ‘primordial sin’.

In paganism they dealt with their guilt by paying homage to the creatures they kileld…this became thanksgiving.
In Abrahamism they made guilt into a weapon a manipulation tool.

This caused an equal and opposite reaction, a rebellion of shamelessness.
And so, moderns and postmoderns are shameless.

15

A lot of philosophers either never reach this far,
or they go too far and neglect foundation.
I’m under the impression that a lot of people online
dislike you, but you are one of the few which basically
has a complete system of thought-culture.
It seems obvious to me.
The end result of all of this:
I choose to respond to life on earth with mercy, appreciation, etc.
You seem to choose soberity as your main product,
in face of how the world works.
That’s not an insult
Soberity is not respected near enough.

16

That’s nice of you to say, Dan…and correct.
Brave to say it publicly surrounded by so many that despise me.
They hate me because I expose their lies; lies they hold to be indubitable truths.

Sobriety is the way I keep my objectivity free from subjective intoxicants.
This does not mean I am not compassionate.
I am only merciless to liars who are arrogant about it.
Self-Deceivers are the worse. Their egos are huge, because they lie to themselves in order to inflate what is vulnerable.

17

See Dan, these liars believe that reality, the truth, requires promotion, and agreement, because their lies are completely dependent on repeated promotion and collective agreements.

So, they assume that whatever I say benefits me, or is an expression of my personal preferences, because their own beliefs are completely founded on their personal preferences and how they benefit them.
Because their beliefs are entirely emotional, they must assume that my own are driven by emotions…like hatred… contrasting to the emotion of love they like to believe is driving their beliefs.

All they have is emotion, so they are quick to defend their own with an emotional accusation.