Lesbians are attracted to the female form that is why they use dildos that are an artificiall phallic creation resembling a penis used in the same manner in lesbian sexual activities and why some lesbians dress up like men. Yup, makes sense to me.
Some lesbians tell themselves they don’t like the phallus, but I think they do. Everyone likes penis, they just don’t like what’s attached to the penis.
They like a bit of masculinity, but not the male form.
Femboys are not masculine, tomboys are not super feminine.
Tomboys are less masculine looking than the average joe.
Which is more masculine looking? Which is closer to the female form?
img1=tomboy - most feminine
img2=femboy - second most feminine
img3=butch lesbian - slightly feminine
img4=average joe - masculine
That being said, I don’t know why lesbians wouldn’t go for femboys. If they don’t, they are biased bigots.
She posts on the internet from a local group home of mentally vulnerable adults deep within her room full of dolls, cartoons, and my little ponies. Go easy on her…
That is an interesting statement, Trix and you have said it before. Women are never attracted to the male form.
"Beauty is not the exclusive attribute of women. Physical beauty can be acknowledged in either sex. Beauty itself can be defined in any number of far more profoundly meaningful ways when applied to a person’s character, spirit, soul, ugliness, etc and shouldn’t preclude the possibility that beauty in its physical form, in it skin-deep sculptural and photographic and artistic representation, could not only be appreciated,………but inspirational.
Love and lust drive all great passions."
I do recall on Know Thyself, but know not where on the Forum, was posted a pic of a sculpture of a man. Totally beautiful.
No, I’m asking what more there is to love than how a man and a woman feel and think about each other. If these feelings and thoughts are denial, that’s one thing, but then what’s the truth they are covering up?
It’s all based upon money, power, dominance, sexual gratification, ego, selfishness, possesion, and narcissism.
Modern civilization can’t admit this because that would cause too many problems to confront so instead we just invent delightful window dressings like love, fidelity, romance, and ect. It’s like wrapping up a turd in silk and calling it beautiful in language or symbology. Hence the denial…
Love is a place, 6 blocks south of where I live. Don’t know why, whenever I think of love, I go to there. I don’t particularly care for the place, its just a dingy piece of road…
Don’t mind joker, he has confused marriages for money for actual love. Love is a rarity, but it does actually exist.
Joker, if you would have read my theories, it would have all been clear to you.
Women are not golddiggers in highschool, males have inherent value in highschool. When women grow up, they lose interest in males, and focus more on using them as manginas. During highschool, love like the first picture can happen, but it is still rare.
Primality but of course the modern human being hates their own nature where they must invent an abundance of concepts to sterilize or cover up their own instinctual nature amongst bold face deceptive lies inverted into fiction.
Offspring is all about genetic legacy or possesion. Once again human beings conflate instincts, biology, and primality into useless words for banal decorum.
More like financial transactionary prenuptial agreement in terms of ownership or renting, especially now into today’s marketed societies. Everything has become a commodity even your own life’s essence.