The paradise imagined by cultural Marxists, a world without boundaries or barriers, where each individual is free to do as he or her or ___________ (insert gender neutral pronoun here) pleases.
Enjoy!!!
I think you are a bit confused. Marx is about the economics. Freeing people to have
lives not dominated by the economic tyranny of capitalism is his goal. I don’t think Marx
says a word about gay porn or porn of any kind. His focus was on economics.
Now I don’t think any communist of note in the 20 or 21st century has made any
comment of any kind about matters such as this. So your subject line is rather incorrect
as is the post itself.
Kropotkin
Dude, for once stop promoting something just because you benefit from it.
It’s like a capitalist poisoning a river for extra profits.
The results will be the same.
Cultural marxism is different than economic marxism, yes. But both come from the same source, historically and intellectually, led obviously by an inordinate amount of jews. This should indicate something obvious. Cultural marxism was built and intended as a destructive ideology, used to destroy culture of foreign nations. Jews use cultural marxism as an attack against “non zionist” nations, countries, peoples, religions, ideologies, etc. But cultural marxism can be used by other groups as well, any group attempting to destroy the culture of a population. The strong trend and dominant theme of cultural marxism is far, far too obvious in the u.s. especially against the “privileged white male”, the Anti-WASP culture.
We could get into details, but it’d get messy too quickly. Liberals, especially atheist secularist liberals, fall too quickly into pro-cultural marxism.
The u.s. is generally anti-cultural and anti-intellectual as well, as a general attitude. Only pro-zionist elements, including most protestant christian groups, are really “allowed” to be vocal.
Most people are too scared or outright stupid to talk about this issue and topic intelligibly, or without quickly giving way to emotionalism.
Kropotkin, aren’t you pro zionism, pro jewish, pro marxist, and anti cultural???
I just clicked on the link and browsed it.
No surprise the twin incestuous male couple is racially white.
I should have expected that, before opening the link. It’s pretty obvious who this cultural rot is targeting. Shall we go into the gory, messy details, or is everybody too afraid here?
For example, a couple innocent questions…
Why doesn’t cultural marxism target a pair of black twin brothers?
Or why doesn’t cultural marxism target a pair of black twin sisters?
Hypothetically, should a pair of incestuous twin black females be “proud” of that? Should they be shameless or ashamed? What is the function of shame, guilt, and morality in a society?
Should anybody be punished in these cases??? And by whom, under what/whose authority?
I’m pretty sure I understand the liberal response to these questions. But I’m looking for something rarer, a different type of response.
K: to be honest, before this post, I had never heard of metapedia. From what I could tell on the
website, it seems to be a racist, far right wing website. Now I may be wrong, but I don’t think so.
To take evidence from a far right, racist website doesn’t seem to a good or wise idea, and so I won’t.
My point still stands despite the racist website.
Kropotkin
Well, I can’t directly associate it with Marx, but I can testify to the fact that what is described is exactly what is going on. What he is describing in that article is exactly the formula being inspired, and for a specific purpose, by specific means. Its end result is predictably a Globalist, very Nazi-like world order with very specific people in charge. And from that, it can be surmised that Marx probably did have a lot to do with it.
And there is no greater racist state than that of Israel/Marx.
K: So much that is wrong outside of one statement, the US is generally anti-cultural and anti-intellectual.
I agree with this much, the rest not so much. I believe I have my view clear on religion however with
that said, I don’t care if you are Christian, jewish, Islamic or Hindu as long as you don’t push
or force people to accept your beliefs. My own personal preference would be not large grand religions,
such as those religions, I would rather have 6 billion religions because religion is really about
one person and their god. Every person should deal with their god privately, between themselves
and their god. One thing the Romans did right was let every one pray to their own gods,
even to the point of having temples in Rome itself. I have no strong feelings toward the jewish
religion, (dated a few jewish girls) as I have no strong feelings for the hindu or Islamic or
jain religion. As for being anti-cultural, I seriously doubt the kardassions pass as culture, so
as popular culture goes, I don’t pay much attention to it. I don’t know the hip songs, singers, or groups.
That is a factor of my age more then anything else. I just don’t care enough to pay attention.
Kropotkin
But what if my belief is the world is spherical, and 95% of people say the earth is flat?
Isn’t it my duty, of knowing truth, to force people to accept a truth even if they resist it?
Truth at what cost???
The legitimization of incest through homosexuality??
Who could have predicted such a thing?‘’
As far as this kind of permissiveness being connected to Marxism, yes and no. Marx and his followers while he was alive would just as willing to hang a homosexual or banish a Jew as any other progressive thinker of the time. They were racists and gay-bashers the lot of them, insofar as they bothered to think about buggery at all. You did not want to be gay under Stalin, Mao, and etc.
That being said, cultural Marxism embraces these things today because, since the willing uprising of the proletariat is pretty obviously never going to happen, the things that keep the proles content such as religion and stable family structure have to be undermined until the proles see themselves the way Marxists see them: as the only worth they have being economic worth. Thus anything that attacks traditional values like this is going to to be a tool of cultural marxists.
But to be fair, left libertarians are just as guilty.
No one is really accountable because economics covers both: the ID and the social approbation of value. The are conversely related, and homosexuality as a social value was part of the the human oversupply as specie. How to increase societal progressive value ? Decrease that oversupply, in light of the vastly decreased level of natural rescources. If that leads to incest, well, most would prefer to be secured an existence, before worrying about the need to find pleasure in procreation. But i doubt one thinghas anything to do with the other, perhaps only marginally.
Then why is homosexuality taking off in places and among cultures that are [i]very obviously not suffering from any overpopulation problems?[/i] Do you think people in California start being born gay because the collective unconscious detects crowding in India and so just decides that the gay population has to shoot up everywhere? I mean, that sounds foolish I know and I don't want to put foolish words in your mouth, but I can't think of any less-foolish way that this could work.
No that is far from foolish analysis, however, for one thing, the internet has been around for around a generation and word gets around. Plus the fact that gays like to travel, and they ‘trick’ with the local population, in places, where the sex trade is thriving.
There may be some subliminal process going on, as if Nature herself though of a way to limit population, i don’t know, but now that may seem unlikely, but who knows.
K: and now get to what you are all
About! You think you have a “TRUTH”
and by god, you are going to force people
to follow that “TRUTH” whether or not
they want to or not. It is as usual for the
Christian about power to dictate to people
how they live and what god they will
follow even if they resist. Indeed truth at what
cost! Even to enslaving your fellow man
Because they don’t follow your truth. How
Very Christian of you.
Kropotkin
Yeah, we're living in a society where nobody can criticize trannies or gays for fear of losing their fucking jobs because it's the CHRISTIANS imposing their truth on everyone. Do you ever fucking stop with the bullshit propaganda? I can hardly wait until siblings are fucking each other and getting married and all the sit coms have a incestuous relationship to prove their diversity chops because [i]THOSE DAMN CHRISTIANS[/i] are forcing everybody to accept their bullshit. Your ideology is turning western society into a catastrophe of depravity, and stamping on the face of anybody who protests, and you have the balls to say it's the Christians forcing their version of truth on everyone.
It looks to me that a very important issue is raised in this thread but used wrongly.
The more important issue is open and proud display of gay incest, not racism.
It is possible that white twins were intentionally promoted but this will not stop blacks to folllow the same route. That will happen for sure, sooner or later. Though, the promoters of this event may not realized this for now. Thus, it is useless to bring racism in that.
If the members remember, the same thing i predicted in other thread not long ago.
Ruling on Homosexuality
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=184804
Those members, who have not read it, may have a look at that.
In that thread, many members accused me that i am biased and making nonsense and imaginary predictions, when i warned about the possibility of likewise things.
Now, in the light of this event, i want to ask those members and others also, on which ground this can be challenged?
Or, it is right thing and should be allowed?
Are we ready to allow this in our own family?
If not, then why?
Do not mitigate the issue by bringing racism into it. You need not to worry. It may be racism for now, but will not remain so very long. It is merely a matter or some months or even less, before we will be able to enjoy homosexual incest of black twins.
with love,
sanjay
Zinnat, it doesn’t matter- the same thing was said about the trannies 10 years ago; that homosexuality would lead to their acceptance. Now the progs toss around the word ‘transphobic’ like it’s a real thing and they were always on board. The leftists will say incest is sick and will never be accepted on Tuesday, and that incest is a valid lifestyle choice that people are bigots to oppose on Wednesday.
Precisely, but that the point to be highlighted by this event is not racism. Racism will not be able to hold this issue long enough within itself.
[b]Let the supporters of homosexuality answer what argument they have to stop this couple.
I am ready to play devil’s advocate and plead on the behalf of this couple. I challenge all supporters of homosexuality to show me how this couple can be morally wrong, whithout holding homosexuality wrong.
Either they will have to accept that this couple is not doing anything wrong or homosexuality is itself wrong, in the first place.[/b]
with love,
sanjay
Race is evolutionary reality.
Race is another real phenomena that cultural Marxist’s have tried to bury in their quest to make a physically homogenous global population of sexless industrial slaves.
A world created for the unfit and the lowest common denominator.
If it comes to it Islamic State is a preferable option to cultural Marxism.
At least under IS there will be no genocide of nature, only that of unbelievers.
Biological integrity will be maintained.