The bottle says it all ( if not driving , away but toward , the point.
No exchanges or returns. , full
Bottle return 5 c
Well yes, it’s clear to me that the ending will be on ta positive note, since, after all thinking a bout it, find that the 2 percent -98 per cent distribution is insufficient for reasons Heidegger could approve, along with Strauss and Polanyi (tacitly)
More like 50.999999999>. <49.00000000000-1.
Old grandad not with standing , soon, it will become obvious.
Liquid courage & faithfulness to the bottle… are they really virtues? Are they vices (privations of, or misdirected virtue) that could TURN BACK to virtue?
I’ll watch the vid in a bit.
You probably won’t, but in case, as a form of reassurance, they don’t call the bottle spirit, if only to give a bodily high. Way back look at that Satyr was the student of Bacchus,
I recall Socrates, during the Symposium, drank everybody under the table, and kept his head. A correct recollection?
Real courage is to keep your head. With or without the liquid.
To keep the spirits tested…in check.
To be of sober mind when all about you is either atomic bombs or debauchery.
Because you have a bigger Yes.
And not just a (very dangerous) Maybe.
The more it goes, the more knowledge on your part in the act becomes apparent. That is, arrival back before recollection was possible by more than simulated means;
Means do not exemplify the way, the method of arrival to a typical average performance, where increasing populations become aware of the assurance such can give
Only who brave the machine that becomes part of
…cliffhangers???
Well yes, and as this critical period nears receeding waters, it’s bound (2)
Meanwhile a dream awoken 
Hobbes’ Leviathan has been criticized for presenting a simplistic view of human nature, overlooking the complexity of motivations, especially the desire for honor, which can lead individuals to act irrationally in wartime 1
. The
work also discusses the question of liberty and the obligation to govern 2
Learn more:
1
War, Madness, and Death: The Paradox o…
A academia.edu
2
Obligation and
Leviathan: see? monster. Just a fragment
Hobbes,
Dreaming of Hobbes’ Leviathan. So what if that ?
Yes old granddad was a pace setter… just saying
But then grandparents come back with a bang even if ignored in deference to parents.
So, in deference to social contracts, the final showdown between good and bad, reflects our ancestors’view , a choice between Hobbes and Rousseau.
Is man a planned being, bound to preexisting infinite repetition whose beginning can’t be separated from its end- which is a series of newer and newer beginnings?
Or, is he an animal like cyber creature whose own shortsighted demolition builds to a crescendo of fear and trembling increased exponentially , mitigated by simulated ideals?
Most likely, both are more nearly alike then different, and that difference is enhanced by a self recreated closeness, that Leibnitz expressed so wel, and is due to a reconsideration.
In 3-5 years that difference between the levels of similarity/dissimilarity will most likely will become .indiscernible
1 Like
Love is a many splendors thing
Paul Webster wrote that who was he?
But then one splendors thing about the choices of boys and the wives sunbathing on the rooftop is that yes it takes enormous energy
Who said ? That? ( think). A modern American composer.
But then he said something astounding that corresponds to the tremendous energy built up and fed bac, and that is the same as what kundalini yoga is about.
That is not all. That is one plane, a seen plane unlike drab lust less phenomenally reducing agents,
The fat lady has just began to sing
()()
But, the one level (I do) up that concerns the vanity of existence it’s sel, the conversion from such to appease and to redeem
So that not only one,(weather) could survive this, but all dreamers who share this here miracle, of even an unholy alliance with the magic
Of the effects/affects of ultimate reduction to primitive abstraction of colonial machinations
That artificial semblance for it’s sake universally adopted and sustained so that
The world can find what she thinks he jeans (means)
Levi Strauss ( not!?)
On the toad to Vegas again.
He was far tooo gone by then, when he sat down by me one fine afternoon by the pool he bought his player played foreigner, and I tried to tell him but couldn’t about how the drug sex rock and roll ra went poof, and what was too late was the building of some one I saw in him, and as he sat. Y me he listened but like he funny something was gone.
No
I’m gonna gone, felt terrible and guilty as with some kind of foreboding, but no it can’t be and how my sweet angel would react to it,
After a long time looking back the squeeze can only be relaxed by Nitchirin, I don’t dare to think that deeper still is an allusion, Shakamuni didn’t think so, but then nowadays the dead understand why world peace has come to the fore or rationalizing it all away, that it’s just a great blown up bubble of defenses that without, would make nonsense of the miracles stumbled in the way.There.
() )(. ()
… and you gotta be not stupid:
)) )). ((.
()
())(()
)())(((((((?
)))))))))(())))))(()()
(((. )))
So I… felt the earth moved, never
Ever look back or pull my daisy while reading house hold (burning now, heroically no idea how or why?
… went away passed, feigning stuck in existence
Doors and eyes closed
How’s that for a stream never can put foot in 2x
Grin and bear it don’t look back, only as immortal statues, then all exist somewhere in the lonely mind of little boy’s Coney Island.
( it problem was written in the mirror caugh thinkin this song all bout,
You and the narcissus springing up by way of a
Faustian prerogative to save, any body through any means whatever
)(())((()
Vance warns against ‘tightening the screws’ on AI in rebuff of Europe
“The United States of America is the leader in AI, and our administration plans to keep it that way,” Vance told an international summit in Paris.
Feb. 11, 2025, 1:50 PM EST
PARIS — Vice President JD Vance warned European allies Tuesday that the White House would not accept international regulations on artificial intelligence if they held back U.S. ambitions to be the world’s dominant power in the revolutionary new technology.
“The United States of America is the leader in AI, and our administration plans to keep it that way,” Vance told an international AI summit in Paris. “We need international regulatory regimes that fosters the creation of AI technology rather than strangles it.”
In his first international speech since taking office, Vance said the U.S. was open to cooperating with other countries to harness AI. But he rejected the kind of tighter technology regulations seen in the European Union.
“The Trump administration is troubled by reports that some foreign governments are considering tightening the screws on U.S. tech companies with international footprints. Now America cannot and will not accept that.”
The Trump administration has made dominance in the field a priority, with the president on Jan. 21 announcing a joint venture to invest billions of dollars in AI infrastructure in the U.S. dubbed Stargate.
Vance also said that AI must remain free from what he called “ideological bias” and criticized E.U. efforts to create rules blocking harmful or misleading online content.
“We want to ensure the internet is a safe place, but it is one thing to prevent a predator from preying on a child on the internet, and it is something quite different to prevent a grown man or woman from accessing an opinion that the government thinks is misinformation,” he said.
Signs of the tensions between the U.S. and Europe on how to approach AI regulation emerged hours after Vance’s speech. The U.S. refused to join around 60 other countries in signing on to a French-led joint statement calling for an “inclusive and sustainable” approach to AI. The White House did not offer an immediate explanation for why it declined to sign on.
Direct To Your Inbox
Get the latest breaking news and must-read articles from NBC News
The global summit in Paris was attended by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Guoqing and came weeks after the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek rattled markets by announcing it had created a sophisticated model at a fraction of the cost of those made in Silicon Valley.
Vance did not explicitly refer to China in his speech but said “authoritarian regimes have stolen and used AI to strengthen their military intelligence and surveillance capabilities.” He also warned European states not to partner with authoritarian states on AI development.
“Partnering with them means chaining your nation to an authoritarian master that seeks to infiltrate, dig in and seize your information infrastructure,” he said. In addition to the former Biden administration, the Trump administration has also pressured European countries to limit their exposure to Huawei, a Chinese telecom firm.
Speaking at the summit Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said his country would simplify its technology rules but added that Europe would need to cooperate with both the U.S. and China.
Macron also said France’s nuclear power infrastructure made it a desirable location for AI development, because it could power energy-intensive data centers without relying on fossil fuels.
“I have a good friend on the other side of the ocean saying ‘Drill, baby, drill,’” Macron said, referring to President Donald Trump. “Here, there is no need to drill. It’s ‘Plug, baby, plug. Electricity is available.”
Anne Bouverot, Macron’s special envoy to the AI summit, told NBC News that the goal of the global gathering was not to begin work on an international framework for regulating AI.
“The summit is not to talk about rules and regulations. The summit is to find where are the areas, where there are coalitions of the willing to develop things, for example, common principles or goals for AI,” she said.
A number of U.S. technology executives attended the conference, including Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Open AI’s Sam Altman.
Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, told NBC News that the U.S. should work closely with allies to make sure that democracies remained ahead of authoritarian nations in the development of AI.
“I think it’s very important that the Western democracies lead in this … so partnering with the Europeans, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, the Western democracy approach, I think, is very important. And I think that’s an important part of the global order.”
And what does /\ this have to do with the price of… eggs?
