Clarification Misery incoming in 1 … 2. … 3 …
I live in the east block, and i am not using multiple accounts.
Because it had decentralized terrorist cells. How about Al-Qaeda instead? Continuity Irish Republican Army? Any preferences for examples on decentralized organizations?
Has nothing to do with islam. ISIS and Al-q are one of the prime examples for an organization that existed a fought for a very long time, specifically because they had independent cells and a decentralized structure.
Antifa is a prime example of that as well.
The guy who was not sentenced but admitted to inappropriate texts with a 17 year old, had been accused of rape in 2016 and 2017 as well. Beyond that, i dont care much. If you think that there are no sex offenders on the left then you are packaged wrong my dude, which is specifically my point here: Bringing up a handful of sex offenders whether from the left or right doesnt prove a single thing.
Dont care about your examples m8, refer to the above and try to get a hold on your brain and drown out your emotions for a second, okay?
The short version of your argument: There are criminals on the right.
Uhuh. And there are criminals on the left, and there are criminals in the center. Tf is your point?
There is nothing to give up my dude, from the very start you had nothing but your emotions which i didnt share. So the outcome was obvious.
I do not live in a hell hole where the government is playing it’s own population against itself, so i cant relate to your situation or your emotional state.
The UK is not the west anymore my dude.
You are a 2nd world island next to europe that will be wiped of its own culture and context within the next 3 generations, and one which until then will continue to play it’s own population against itself across ideological lines.
Have fun tearing out your own throats i guess, at least there will be less work for the islamists.
^^^^ just a long farty shit
You know all about those. You make them too 
Eastern Bloc = North Korea nods
Master of Western sociology. Master of farty shits. I should feel honoured.
However …
You can keep it local. Its the post soviet east block.
That being said, i disagree with you but i dont resent your opinion. I think its valid, its just shaped by what the UK is today.
Its unfortunate but not completely misplaced.
That being said, no, the rest of the world does not look like the UK. With caveats at least. France, Germany and the Netherland areas are starting to get there too.
OK so from this wasted 2 hours of my life, l get this from you:
- You disagree with some random pic l pasted into my music video
- You disagree with it because it jokingly says Antifa are the real fascists. In fact, you believe Antifa to be fascist(ic)
- You disagree that the far right are far right
- You disagree that the far right can be fascist or Nazi
- You disagree that anybody can be Nazi, which by implication means that neo-Nazis are not Nazis.
- You believe Nazis did not exist 30 years ago anywhere in Europe. Since WW2 they were gone. This clearly has nothing to do with you coming from an East European Communist Soviet satellite state behind the Iron Curtain which only fell circa 1990, i.e. just over 30 years ago.
- And so you tacitly confess or do not confess (l’m getting quite dizzy now) that your people did or did not spontaneously turn neo-Nazi once the Iron Curtain fell some 30 years ago. I mean, Nazism to you is only 30 years old. I mean, you say Nazis wasn’t around 30 years ago, by which you mean 30 years + 1 minute later, they spontaneously appeared, which coincides with the dissolution of the Iron Curtain, and implies your people spontaneously turned Nazi right after that. Or did not. I guess we need to look how we define it.
- Nazis aren’t actually wrong, nor are Fascists, because look at immigrants
- You don’t hate immigrants, just the illegal ones. And besides, look how many immigrants, legal or otherwise there are. Tsk tsk.
- You’re not jealous at all. East European failed states failed for historic reasons. Hmmm because .. .because … Turks. Yes, Turks. Always with the Turks. They enslaved erm … 7 million in your country. And killed 30 million if at all. Because if you calculate the size of a shio’s galley, that’s 200. 200 slaves, all from your country. Per ship. Times by 500 ships that’s 100,000 slaves. Each slave was worked to death rather than his life being preserved because, come on , Turks man. That’d give a slave a lifecycle of about 6 months. So, 100,000 slaves @ 6 months lifecycle = 200,000 slaves per annum. Times by 200 years of brutal Ottoman slavery, we get 40 million dead. Make it 30 million to be sure. Or 50 million ¯_( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)_/¯
- So, no, you’re not jealous and fascist / communist totalitarianism was FORCED ON YOU as well as Turkish slavery. The solution is of course YET MORE TOTALITARIANISM. It’s the only way we’re gonna win this war.
- You probably want to help your brethren Western European Elvish kingdoms who are being attacked by Orcish migrants. You will prove yourselves useful. As murder weapons in the hands of Putin the master of puppets and agitprop to whom all your weird political thunder traces back to.
- But yes, you aint fascist, aint nazi, and hate antifa.
Do you recall what Hitler said about East Europeans?
Did you read anything l wrote on this thread? I explained about economic exploitation, desperate migrants made fools by their very human greed, which all humans will show to a degree when desperate enough, and l also explained about manipulation by the far right, and l also explained how extreme progressives and the far right are a destructive force, and the far left are just a stabilising counterstroke, and how antifa are not a formal organisation.
So please, don’t blame migrants. Admit you are unhappy where you are and want to scapegoat migrants for being where you’d rather be.
TL;DR: Illegal migration is a problem, and mass migration is sad, it all traces back to economic exploitation by the global system. As such it’s a big mess that won’t be fixed anytime soon or easily, and you’re peddling quick simple solutions provided to you by billionaire venture capitalist bosses (Putin-aligned) of the far right who probably ship illegals in (shipping them in requires tightly controlled organised crime networks and Old Money), billionaires that want peopleon £16 / hr to turn on people on £4 / hr. Your simple solution is Nazism despite what Nazis said about you but it’s okay, because see, you’re not Nazi, and Antifa are Nazi and you just hate antifa for that reason, which … hang on … doesn’t make you … antifa? Blushes
Yeah cause you know… going around bashing the heads of your political opposition in, is widely considered to be a bit fascistic…
I merely have no idea what that refers to in a world where the Overton window looks like this
Nop. That one is wrong. The far right can be absolutely fascistic and chances are that (due to the pendulum swinging back hard) they gonna be very fascistic very soon.
Why couldnt anyone be a nazi? Anyone can be a marxist nutter too. Not sure where you got this one from.
Were nazis a credible ideological or political movement in europe or america 10-20-30 years ago? The answer is simply no to that.
No. Are you really going to act now like after Adolf Hitler nazis didnt become the antichrist across half the planet? Are we really going to do that?
Ofc nazism is not 30 years old, but when was the last time it was actually a credible political or ideological force with people supporting it? Oh thats right about 80 years ago during the ride of Adolf during which germany raped itself across the entire continent and made sure that nobody will want to have to do anything with that ideology for at least 5 generations to come.
Oh thats an interesting statement on so many levels.
First of all in regards of democracy because apparently now politicians no longer need to be beholden to the will of the people and they can just decide to repopulate your f-ing country.
And then going from there according to your logic, you are meant to clap to that like a seal and spread your ass cheeks because resisting being displaced by a government of f-ing globalist insects is considered fascism.
You want me to be specific?
No i dont even hate illegal migrants as long as they are able and willing to integrate into the society they are entering.
You know what i hate though? Dictators for example. You know what i hate even more? Human looking snails in a dictatorial position like Kier Starmer. Coz you know, Britain has free speech’n all they just follow the nort korean logic of “you can say anything the government approves of. As for the rest, we are already pulling more people into jail over social media posts than china”
Are we really gonna shit post about 500 year old history now?
Look my brother, you can spin this any way you prefer and like but no country signed up to have it’s population replaced by people who lied about everything during their election campaign and are now sitting at the worst approval rating IN HUMAN HISTORY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PLANET.
You talk about the problem of fascism but somehow at the same time you really dont have much issue with f-ing over entire nations through dictatorial rule and just jailing whoever stands in your way.
One could almost say that a weee bit of your fascism is showing.
Can they be blamed for the 800-1200% increase in crime in multiple countries, or is “we cant expect the poor little third worlders not to rape women and children” baked into this argument?”
Because nothing speaks “ppl only want scapegoats” like having to put tank traps around xmas fairs ala germany. Totally for no reason either. You know ppl are just salty for no reason at all or smth.
And you know what? No. Im not even gonna place the blame for this on all the third worlders.
The blame lies with the globalists who manufactured the migration crisis in the first place and who opened up borders and removed proper integration alongside with it.
But acting like people do not have a reason to be vapid with rage when the accepting countries slid back to 2nd world status due to the sh*t the globalists are pulling? Nah dude. Just nah.
TL;DR:
Remember the time during which if or anyone else wanted to become a citizen in another country within europe i.e. the UK, they needed a passport, proof that they aint criminals and then had to learn the country’s customs, laws, history as well as do a pledge amongst the many?
Do you think there is an issue these days when ppl can burn all their documents, jump on a boat, sail straight into your country and instead of being tossed out or anything, they are put into 4 star hotels and get citizenship spat at them?
This aint on the migrants.
This is on the people who intentionally and knowingly created a crisis.
Because you know whats funny?
All of this could have been easily avoided just by integrating newcomers properly instead of letting them in without rime or reason and letting them roam society as they please. Nobody could have said a damn thing about migrants which integrated into society.
Nobody.
Do you see ppl across europe throwing the chinese out? The Turks? Half the restaurants across europe are owned by them and yet for some reason nobody gives a single damn about them, they appreciate the infusion of culture they bring with them.
Why? Because they integrated. And thats all there is to it.
F-ing hungary is full with Turkish shops. TURKISH SHOPS. And there aint a SINGLE hate incident because nobody cares about people who are perfectly capable of abiding by law and culture and are there just living their lives and running shops and businesses like everyone else.
And thats hungary. A country that had 150+ years of blood feud with the ottomans and turks.
Yet not a hint of it exists today for some magical, unknown reason.
Clarification Misery - Book #4: You know l meant Nazism post WW2 seems a recent phenomenon to you, l clarified.
Perhaps you don’t understand the great Empires, you are outside of all that, except maybe Czechia, Slovakia and a leeettle bit of Austria and Ukraine.
The Empires inherited the citizenry. The Empires invited us over after WW2 especially, but also before then, to provide cheap and ready labour. We exist to send money back home. The new migrants are part of some heavy heavy geopolitical fallout and it is concerning to us all. I’m not going to go headfirst into hating and pearlclutching though, i’m staying sober in my analysis.
India used to be the lion’s share of the world’s GDP and now …? So think about that, think how global commerce favours the destination nations.
Integration? Do you think the captains of industry would care about an immigrants’ front window display? As long as they can drive a forklift.
Also a big incentive is that if UK & EU are where the immigrants are all going to, then the immigrant nations will always be quietly bound to these top destination nations, i.e. lower than them, exploitable for resources both human and mineral. Shrugs, someone has to be lower than others otherwise who would work for anybody?
So as you can see, everything does actually make sense. If you want to live well, this is how you would arrange the world. If yo want to average out the world so everyone is equal, then in the West, there will be a huge drop in quality of life. Nobody wants that. The status quo is better and you perhaps don’t get tihs as you don’t live in the West.
After all is said and done, it’s not really for you to make these grand judgements. You haven’t built these empires. You didn’t race ahead after WW2 and reach for the stars (Moon). The rest of the world is a backwater. The West looks out into space.
Re: Hungary, well, perhjaps you know: Pest used to be where the Muslim Hungarian soldiers lived, even before Ottoman times. They were l think Kipchaks or Kabars. Islam has a long history in Hungary even before Ottoman times and in fact the Magyars were originally a type of Turk (Romans or Byzantines called the Magyars “Torci”). I think they came from Khanty-Mansiy and even Bashkortostan was called Greater Hungary by one Christian friar in his historiography.
The Magyars of course mixed with their Slavic subjects and so today they are mostly Slavic and German, but they just speak Hungarian. I get that integration of Turks is going well for you. I wish the Ottoman Empire would return at least to the Balkans, it was a peaceful time and the Ottomans were unfairly labelled the Sick Man of Europe by Hapsburg and Russian propaganda.
I don’t wanna talk down to you man and I really agree that today l’m seeing a lot of trash here in the UK and it’s making me quite nervous but my explanation is that the right wing are behind this. It serves them best, beyond keeping a nation ahead in the world by cheap labour, the trashy element arriving here are justification for the right wing and i think you should consider them as possibly behind this all - sometimes a plot can be complex and not obvious.
One thing that narcks me off is you were wrongly accusing a list of people of being left wing sex offenders. From what l could see, none of them at all were left wing and / or sex offenders and the 17 year old girl wasn’t a crime. You just don’t understand the far right wing, l don’t know why, maybe Hungary doesn’t suffer from it so much …??? Or it’s not been exposed (though Orban did cover up someone’s sex crimes). The far right is a Freudian toilet and it’s not that because of immigration they will turn into Nazis. The far right are already fascists and Nazis, l don’t get why you don’t see it. I’m going to chalk it all down to Hungarian society being a very narrow window on the world l guess? Seems you’re living a sheltered life which is good … but not so good when you think you have a full understanding of a complex industrial powerhouse like Western Europe or USA for that matter. Peace.
I dont think that the globalists have an ideology beyond self serving.
They will happily make use of the left as well as the right cause it doesnt matter one bit to them.
Most of their values and philosophy is left aligned and motivated by utter psychopaths like Herbert Marcuse, Wilhelm Reich or Antonio Gramsci who advocated for the destruction of family and culture in order to achieve hegemony and turning the population into rootless, identity void cattle.
I mean i am sorry, but nazis sacrificing their country for cheap labor…? The only thing nazis care about is their own nation above all. How can you think that the right is interested in whats happening these days across europe? This is an oxymoron. You cant be a nazi and at the same time work at the erasure of your own country.
The point was and remains that there are criminals on all sides. I sincerely hope you are not suggesting that the left is some kind of holy icon that has no blemishes because we both know you are not that stupid.
So plain and simply im telling you that its pointless to bring up criminals among the right the same way its pointless to bring up crimes among the left. Criminals are not bound to an ideology.
I will make the reservation that i do not know about the right wing in the UK, but in same fashion and breath: You absolutely cant use that metric for the rest of europe because you will be ridiculed out of this world.
The right aint going around here raping children and torching places. Thats what the left is doing around here. Thats all i can tell you.
Your experience might be different. Im not gonna accuse you of lying, but at the same time, i am not lying either, so it is what it is.
It doesnt.
We had a far right party (“Magyar Gárda” running under the name “jobbik”) and even though they were behaving just fine aside from marching around, it was in part Orban who had directed police and lawenforcement oversight on them precisely because nobody wanted an association with far right extremism. They had some support, but they were a minor party and were eventually worn down.
So no. God honestly in the east block you wont find organized far right extremism.
A few decades ago we still had the football hooligans with their bs but eventually they too just mostly dispersed because their nonsense behavior had too many consequences for them.
I mean there is a reason why even the Jews consider this place one of the safest in europe.
So yeah. I can only assume that the picture is different in the UK. But thats it.
Your situation does not overlap with the world around here.
For the above reasons probably.
Apparently the UK is in a unique position in this regard as well. Cause for a lot of places, the exact opposite is going on with the left being the ones who perpetually stir things up.
Maybe it is. A few countries in the east block simply said no to the entire globalism stuff, but that might easily change now that Orban is out of the picture.
Its easily possible that within 10 years this will be another hellhole thanks to the globalists and their lackeys.
Fully? No. But i do think that there are plenty of objective issues which i can defend with arguments in regards of how we got to this chaos in the first place.
I dont think that i am lying when i tell you that britan was a much more peaceful and normal place 20 to 40 years ago. And starting from there you can piece by piece make your own conclusions as to what went wrong.
Peace to you as well.
Online marketplace fees have increased since the early 2000s. I mean the actual percentage. The percentage should not increase, it’s scaleable. At the same time, the Somalians mass migrated into the UK like never before. Who do you think is to blame?
As for globalists … l don’t buy into any of that. I mean, there are surely people with globalist aims, it’s as old as empire itself. But to give them a name and a genda …
… suggests that they have powerful opponents.
… and to be an opponent you can download a PDF exposing them, even find out the names of their leaders
… and perhaps after downloading the PDFs and visiting certain websites, you can become empowered to overthrow them, by going on marches and forming martial arts networks etc.
I think this is implicit in the whole conspiracy scene and risible because if anybody thinks life is that simple … then they are mistaken. And let’s face it, the only thing that will end up happening is:
… immigrants get attacked, their shops smashed, their mosques torched. As a stop-gap until you finally topple their globalist masters.
Strangely it never proceeds past this. Wonder why?
I checked out Mongolian crime rates and admittedly, the rates only increased by about 10-20% since … 1912? Up to 2000.
So, let’s just get back to Blighty (Britain, UK to be precise) -
MY SUMMARY: CRIMES HAVE INCREASED QUITE A BIT BUT IT IS EXPLICABLE BY NEW CRIMES, MORE REPORTING, BETTER DETECTION
Crime rates between 1900 and 1955
Many factors make it difficult to be accurate about crime rates. However, there was an increase in crime from the late 1920s due to the economic depression and then World War Two. After 1955, crime rose steeply.
Problems with crime statistics
Statistics about crime rates were recorded annually by the government after 1898. However, historians must treat the data cautiously, for the following reasons:
- Some crime was not reported officially. For example, in the past, some problems, particularly with young offenders, might have been dealt with informally without being recorded by the police.
- Some crime was reported more than it had been in the past. This was the case in instances of burglary, because insurance companies required reporting to the police in order for a claim to be made.<==== THIS EXPLAINS THE EXPLOSION IN RAPE CRIME IN SWEDEN, COINCIDING WITH MASS-MIGRATION
- Laws changed so that some offences were no longer crimes and new crimes emerged. <==== AGAIN, THIS EXPLAINS THE EXPLOSION IN RAPE CRIME IN SWEDEN, COINCIDING WITH MASS-MIGRATION - “MARITAL RAPE” BECAME A CRIME, WHICH INCIDENTALLY THE RIGHT WING WOULD OPPOSE, YET THEY MAKE USE OF IT TO SAY MIGRANTS ARE “RAPE-FUGEES” CAUSING RAPES ALL OVER SWEDEN, WHEN IN FACT IT’S JUST STATISTICAL QUIRKS
Crime rates between 1900 and 1955
Between 1900 and 1925, crime rates were relatively stable. They then increased in the late 1920s and 1930s, with the onset of economic problems and unemployment during the depression. The government was also dealing with many strikes and protests during this period.
When World War Two broke out in 1939, crime rates fell initially, then rose again during the Blitz in 1940. Criminals took advantage of the air raids to steal from people’s homes, shops and even people killed in the air raids. The war also brought rationing, which led to the theft and illegal sale of goods on the black market.
Crime since 1955
After 1955, crime increased significantly, at a much faster rate than the increase in population. Violent crime increased, as did other types of crime. The number of murders fell, but this has largely been explained by improvements in medicine, which meant that fewer people died from injuries.
Car-related crime
By 1900, the motor car had been invented and car ownership increased over the 20th century. New laws were created to restrict speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol. As a result, car-related crime is now one of the biggest categories of crime.
Car-related crime includes:
- drink driving - an alcohol limit was introduced in 1967
- not wearing seat belts - compulsory for drivers after 1983 and adult passengers after 1991
- breaking the speed limit
- joy-riding, where people steal a car and then abandon it after riding around in it
- car theft and the sale of stolen vehicles
Road deaths have fallen since the 1960s, even though there are now more cars on the road. Car theft has also significantly decreased as security systems in cars have been improved.
Football hooliganism
Violence among spectators at football matches increased throughout the 20th century, reaching its height in the 1970s and 1980s. It has fallen again since match security has increased and the use of CCTV has become more widespread.
Hate crimes
In 1948, the government passed the British Nationality Act, which gave all citizens of the British Empire, now Commonwealth, unrestricted access to Britain. Between 1950 and 1975, many people from places such as the Caribbean, India, Kenya and Pakistan moved to Britain.
Although communities of black African and Asian origin have lived in Britain for thousands of years, this wave of immigration led to a great deal of social tension. New arrivals were often scapegoated for other social problems, and faced discrimination in finding housing or jobs, as well as physical violence.
From the 1960s onwards, British governments passed legislation in the form of Race Relations Acts aimed at ensuring equal rights for all people in Britain:
| Date | Act |
|---|---|
| 1965 | The first act made it an offence to refuse to serve someone because of their race or ethnicity. But it didn’t cover key areas such as shops, employment or boarding houses. |
| 1968 | This act made discrimination in areas such as housing and employment illegal. This was a step forward but hard to enforce. |
| 1976 | This act made racially offensive music and publications illegal. It set up ways for employees to report employers for discrimination. The Commission for Racial Equality was established to investigate racism. |
In 1998, racially and religiously motivated crimes were made specific offences. The 2003 Criminal Justice Act then increased the possible sentences available for offenders who commit hate crimes - crimes that demonstrate or are motivated by hostility towards victims on the basis of their actual or perceived characteristics. These characteristics now include
- race
- religion
- disability
- sexual orientation
- transgender identity
This type of crime is known as hate crime. Hate crimes are motivated by prejudice or hostility and can include, but are not limited to, acts of vandalism, physical assault and harassment.
The overall percentage of criminal offences that are recorded as hate crimes is small but government statistics show that the figure has risen in the 21st century. This might suggest Britain is becoming a more violent society. Alternatively, it could mean that hatred that has previously been unrecorded is now coming to light, with victims feeling more secure about speaking out and courts being more willing to listen.
Drug-related crime
The government made cocaine and opium illegal substances as early as 1920. However, it was not until the 1960s that illegal drug-taking became a serious problem in society.
In 1971, the government categorised drugs into classes A, B and C. Offences relating to Class A drugs carry the harshest punishments. Supplying Class A drugs to other people initially resulted in a maximum prison sentence of 14 years. This increased to a maximum prison sentence of life from 1985.
Despite these attempts and others, governments have struggled to prevent drug-related crimes, and drug smuggling and drug-taking are still rising. Organised crime groups make billions of pounds from the drugs trade. Gangs in cities sell drugs and addicts may turn to criminal activity to fund their addiction. Organised crime groups may fight - and even kill - members of rival groups to keep control of the illegal drug trade in areas of the country.
Cybercrime
When widespread internet access arose in the 1990s criminal activity in Britain changed. In 2015, the government included figures for cybercrime in the national crime statistics for the first time. The cybercrime rate had doubled from the previous year. Cybercrime includes:
- illegally downloading content (eg films or music)
- sending phishing emails to trick people into handing over personal details (eg their credit card details)
- using computer viruses to detect people’s passwords
- hacking into the systems of government departments or big businesses (or threatening to do so unless the organisation hands over money)
- directly hacking into banking systems and transferring money into the criminal’s account
Despite increasingly smart technology, cybersecurity cannot always keep up with the cyber criminals (sometimes also known as hackers).
MY COMMENT: NOW LET’S GET TO THE PRESENT
Demographics: The Muslim population in UK is mostly Asian. Not all Asians are Muslims of course, l’d say at least 60% are. Use the following graph to calibrate the later stats -
SO, FOR MUSLIMS, TAKE THE ASIAN PERCENTAGE OF UK (approx. 9%) and take 60% of that (6%-7% is a good generous estimate).
SO, FOR THE FOLLOWING STATS, IF MUSLIMS ARE PROPORTIONATELY REPRESENTED IN CRIME STATS, THEY WILL ACCOUNT FOR 6-7% ONCE YOU MULTIPLY THE ASIAN % BY 0.6 (60%) - i.e. IF ASIANS ARE 8% OF A CRIME CATEGORY, MUSLIMS WOULD BE (0.6*8)% OF THAT = 4.8%, WHICH IS BELOW THE 6-7% IF MUSLIMS WERE PROPORTIONATELY CRIMINAL IN THAT CATEGORY, i.e. Muslims are less criminal than their % stake in the population of the UK.
MY COMMENT: NOW THE JUICE
Source: Statistics on Ethnicity and the Criminal Justice System, 2024 (HTML) - GOV.UK
VICTIMS OF CRIME:
Sum across all horiztonal groups = 100%
ARRESTS:
Sum across each VERTICAL bar = 100%
INDICTABLE OFFENCES:
SUM ACROSS EACH HORIZONTAL BAR = 100%
Of the defendants prosecuted for indictable offences in 2024, where ethnicity is known, 83% were White, 7% were Black, 6% were Asian, 3% were of Mixed ethnicity and 1% were of the Other ethnic group - with similar proportions seen in convictions.
PRISON POPULATION:
Sum across each VERTICAL bar = 100%
Muslims are one of the least criminal groups in the UK. Remember to multiple “Asian” by 0.6-0.7 to get an approximateion the percentage of that category that are Muslims doing it.
UK crime has increased drastically since 1921 but this can be attributed to new crime categories, better detection and increased reporting.
Notably: the new crime cats and increased reporting also actually explain the recent (since circa 2000) explosion in Sweden’s rapes. Coinciding with mass migration. BUT BUT … Sweden made marital rape a crime, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly native Swedes etc etc.
This creation of marital rape as a crime cat should be against Right Wing ideals of family and protecting marriage right? Yet the right wing treat is a gift when they need stats to scapegoat migrants as rapists.
I would also theorise that since mass migration of Asians into the UK circa 1970 onward, native Whites have sliiiightly increased in economic status, and an increase in affluence = decrease in criminality (basically because there’s less need to be a scumbag if you are well off).
So, a slight increase in White affluence is indeed mirrored in a slight under-representation of White race in the stats, but note that even though Asians (think: my intended focus = Muslims) are very low economic class (poor, not very affluent) they STILL manage to be under-represented in crime too!
Again this graph ^^^
The sharp peak was late 80s, when the UK went into a massive economic recession. This was before the huge jump in migrants (refugees mainly l think) from 2000 onward so you can’t say it was refugees.
So my point is, look what poverty does to crime stats. Muslims live very poor in the UK. Yet they still manage to be under-represented in crime, not just as an ethnicity (presumed Asian with slight overestimation to correct for other Muslim ethnicities), but as poor people.
Thats entirely on you. I have been watching davos and WEF reports for slowly for a decade.
Everything that happens today in the world and i do mean EVERYTHING has been announced there years ahead of time.
The framework was laid out for everyone to see.
You are either someone who pays attention to it, or not. Thats all there is to it.
As for this stuff:
You are living in a propaganda hell hole, i have repeatedly told you this much.
You have literally zero feasible data on what is being done in the country because your government categorically false reports.
You can ask ANY ai with as generic of a non loaded question as you please and you will be told under no uncertain terms that crimes have increased on average by 20-40% in all major accepting countries.
Not only that but crimes which didnt exist before in those countries have been now settled there with gang warfare, explosions, knife and acid attacks and more with certain crime types increasing by up to 1800%
Doesnt matter what you do or say, there are much wider data sets available to everyone than britain which has a long history of lying about it’s statistics.
And all of those data sets point in one single direction. It is what it is.
Now with all of that being said, in regards of muslims:
Not every illegal is a muslim. So there is no point for me to focus on them or any one single specific demography. I am not going to pick any specific skin color or any specific religion from the influx. Maybe muslims are the least violent ones, maybe they arent, but the problem here is with migration and integration as a whole, not with muslims in particular.
I have no beef with muslims nor do i have a reason to single them out for anything.
So you ignore the stats. To you, they are all propaganda. Your entire viewpoint is finally sealed as unfalsifiable. There is no null test.
You claim to follow the WEF etc and it’s something prophetic to you. They may accurately forecast trends and societal changes but you make the error of shooting the messenger. These changes would occur regardless who meets up at which club.
You ignore that society changes when urbanisation occurs plus the myriad other things l mentioned e.g. new crime categories, increased detection etc.
Oddly the most favourable graphic to back up your xenophobia is the one you held up to ridicule. As l say, that graph actually shows how the major depression at the end of the 80s created a spike in crime.
Also these “accepting countries” were all accepting countries because they were devastated by 2 world wars. World Wars leave labour shortages and the population loses morality. That’s what world wars and bombings do. They obliterate morality. Sure, Hungary suffered big time too, but it wasn’t ploughed up like the fields of Flanders.
I see no coutnerargument from you other than bluster.
You state refugees doing 5000 rapes in the UK - no evidence. Nor any statement of their political affiliation.
You state crimes have gone up in accepting countries 20-40%. And some crimes increased by 1800%. Guess what? Yep, the man gives no evidence.
At this point, it would be best if you find Sauron’s ring, Darth Vader’s helmet, Boromir’s electric guitar and just retake Europe. Even if you only get as far as the nearest Turkish Shop at least you’ll get it all out of your system. Then we can pick up where we left off.