Monopantheism

[MySiddhi]

@Mad Man P

@MySiddhi

If your version of the equation does not translate into a sentence that reads “X exists as X” than you have NOT corrected my equation.

A = A
It needs not be explicitly stated… All things exist as themselves.

You may think that Reflexivity of Existence is a trivial notion… but a statement such as;

“nothing exists as nothing”

Is one of the most profound philosophic statements to have ever been expressed… and it just so happens to be a logical tautology… in other words it is absolutely true.

You would be surprised to know how many people actually think that nothing does/can/has exist(ed). Entire philosophies and religions are founded on it (ex nihilo)… including some physics perspectives;

From Reflexivity of Implication and Identity Morphism;

(T5) Nothing is made of nothing. - Everything is made of something. (Parmenides)
(A → A)∧(idA: A → A) [pantheism]

Or from Identity Morphism and Reflexivity of Existence;

(T7) Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed. - Something has always existed everywhere. (Mars)
(idA: A → A)∧(∃Ax)(A = x) [eternal, invincible, perfect, omnipresent]

… we have destroyed ex nihilo and all the philosophies, and religious, and physics perspectives founded on it…

[Rhinoboy]

@MySiddhi

@Xunzian

This seems a development of your thread in philo. Why does it warrant a separate thread?

This is on religion and proving the foundations of religion. The other is about foundations of reality in general… and does not contain any religious deductions.

Im seeing little to link this directly to the idea that all religions at foundation level are right. I have not looked at the links because my work computer will not allow it. Am I missing something?

[MySiddhi]

@Rhinoboy

@MySiddhi

@Xunzian

This seems a development of your thread in philo. Why does it warrant a separate thread?

This is on religion and proving the foundations of religion. The other is about foundations of reality in general… and does not contain any religious deductions.

Im seeing little to link this directly to the idea that all religions at foundation level are right. I have not looked at the links because my work computer will not allow it. Am I missing something?

Most religions have the same claim about God’s being (whether they understand it or not);

…eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, infinite… generating and sustaining cause of that which exists.

[futureone]

@MySiddhi

You may think that Reflexivity of Existence is a trivial notion… but a statement such as;

“nothing exists as nothing”

Is one of the most profound philosophic statements to have ever been expressed… and it just so happens to be a logical tautology… in other words it is absolutely true.

You would be surprised to know how many people actually think that nothing does/can/has exist(ed). Entire philosophies and religions are founded on it (ex nihilo)… including some physics perspectives;

From Reflexivity of Implication and Identity Morphism;

(T5) Nothing is made of nothing. - Everything is made of something. (Parmenides)
(A → A)∧(idA: A → A) [pantheism]

Or from Identity Morphism and Reflexivity of Existence;

(T7) Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed. - Something has always existed everywhere. (Mars)
(idA: A → A)∧(∃Ax)(A = x) [eternal, invincible, perfect, omnipresent]

… we have destroyed ex nihilo and all the philosophies, and religious, and physics perspectives founded on it…

Word games, parlor tricks…

What will be destroyed is the whole universe and its too bad nobody will be there to laugh at how they disproved your assertions and brag about it.

As a matter of fact I think there is actually a way to destroy it, 2 ways at least.